使用不同CAD软件制作的单一后牙种植体支持修复体近端间和咬合接触的临床研究。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Moamen Mohsen Sarhan, Nermeen Abd Elsalam Rady, Mohamed Moataz Khamis
{"title":"使用不同CAD软件制作的单一后牙种植体支持修复体近端间和咬合接触的临床研究。","authors":"Moamen Mohsen Sarhan, Nermeen Abd Elsalam Rady, Mohamed Moataz Khamis","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The accuracy of the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software programs remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this clinical study was to assess the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed with 2 distinct dental CAD software programs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty single posterior implant-supported restorations were evaluated for interproximal and occlusal contacts. Restorations were designed with 2 CAD software programs (exocad and Dental System) by using the same digital scan and milled with the same milling machine and material. Two study groups were formed according to the CAD software program used (n=20). Dental floss, 12-µm shimstock, the OccluSense device, and the Medit occlusion analyzer app were used to evaluate the interproximal, static, and dynamic occlusal contacts. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used, and the Z-test was used to compare the results (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interproximal and static occlusal contacts were statistically more accurate when using the Dental System 3Shape software program than the exocad software program (P<.05). No statistically significant difference in the dynamic occlusal contact was found between the 2 studied groups (P=.147).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations differed depending on the CAD software program used. The Dental System 3Shape software program demonstrated more accurate interproximal and static occlusal contacts than the exocad software program.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations fabricated using different CAD software programs: A clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Moamen Mohsen Sarhan, Nermeen Abd Elsalam Rady, Mohamed Moataz Khamis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.11.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The accuracy of the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software programs remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this clinical study was to assess the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed with 2 distinct dental CAD software programs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty single posterior implant-supported restorations were evaluated for interproximal and occlusal contacts. Restorations were designed with 2 CAD software programs (exocad and Dental System) by using the same digital scan and milled with the same milling machine and material. Two study groups were formed according to the CAD software program used (n=20). Dental floss, 12-µm shimstock, the OccluSense device, and the Medit occlusion analyzer app were used to evaluate the interproximal, static, and dynamic occlusal contacts. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used, and the Z-test was used to compare the results (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interproximal and static occlusal contacts were statistically more accurate when using the Dental System 3Shape software program than the exocad software program (P<.05). No statistically significant difference in the dynamic occlusal contact was found between the 2 studied groups (P=.147).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations differed depending on the CAD software program used. The Dental System 3Shape software program demonstrated more accurate interproximal and static occlusal contacts than the exocad software program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.11.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.11.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:使用计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件程序设计的单一后牙种植体支持修复体近端间和咬合接触的准确性仍然不确定。目的:本临床研究的目的是评估用2种不同的牙科CAD软件设计的单一后牙种植体支持修复体的近端间和咬合接触。材料和方法:对近端间和咬合接触的40个单一后牙种植体支持修复进行评估。修复体采用2种CAD软件程序(exocad和Dental System)设计,使用相同的数字扫描,使用相同的铣床和材料进行铣削。根据所使用的CAD软件程序组成两个研究组(n=20)。使用牙线、12µm摆托、OccluSense设备和Medit咬合分析仪应用程序评估近端间、静态和动态咬合接触。采用Shapiro-Wilk正态性检验,采用z检验比较结果(α= 0.05)。结果:使用Dental System 3Shape软件的近端接触和静态咬合接触比使用exocad软件的近端接触和静态咬合接触更准确(p)。结论:单后牙种植体支持修复体近端接触和静态咬合接触的准确性因使用CAD软件的不同而不同。Dental System 3Shape软件程序比exocad软件程序显示出更准确的近端间和静态咬合接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations fabricated using different CAD software programs: A clinical study.

Statement of problem: The accuracy of the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software programs remains uncertain.

Purpose: The aim of this clinical study was to assess the interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations designed with 2 distinct dental CAD software programs.

Material and methods: Forty single posterior implant-supported restorations were evaluated for interproximal and occlusal contacts. Restorations were designed with 2 CAD software programs (exocad and Dental System) by using the same digital scan and milled with the same milling machine and material. Two study groups were formed according to the CAD software program used (n=20). Dental floss, 12-µm shimstock, the OccluSense device, and the Medit occlusion analyzer app were used to evaluate the interproximal, static, and dynamic occlusal contacts. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used, and the Z-test was used to compare the results (α=.05).

Results: The interproximal and static occlusal contacts were statistically more accurate when using the Dental System 3Shape software program than the exocad software program (P<.05). No statistically significant difference in the dynamic occlusal contact was found between the 2 studied groups (P=.147).

Conclusions: The accuracy of interproximal and occlusal contacts of single posterior implant-supported restorations differed depending on the CAD software program used. The Dental System 3Shape software program demonstrated more accurate interproximal and static occlusal contacts than the exocad software program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信