国家队列中叶酸与肺癌死亡之间的时间依赖性双向关联

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Blessing E Odion, Logan Cowan, Lili Yu, Jian Zhang
{"title":"国家队列中叶酸与肺癌死亡之间的时间依赖性双向关联","authors":"Blessing E Odion, Logan Cowan, Lili Yu, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between folate and the risk of cancer remains undetermined partially due to the dynamic changes in folate intakes at the population level caused by folic acid fortification implemented in the USA and other countries. To control for the interference from fortification, we assessed the relationship between folate and lung cancer death (LCD) risk among a national cohort established years before folic acid fortification. We followed up 14 528 adults aged 19 years or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) on average for 14 years. LCD's hazard ratios were estimated by the folate levels using Cox regressions. After 192 973 person-years (py) of follow-up, 233 LCDs were recorded. The LCD rates were 1.20/1000 py, 1.14/1000 py, and 1.38/1000 py for adults with low (1st quarter), moderate (2nd and 3rd quarter), and high (4th quarter) serum folate. In the first 10 years of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.87 (1.30-6.37) for adults with moderate, and 1.56 (0.58-4.23) for adults with high serum folate, compared to adults with low serum folate. For adults who survived longer than 10 years of follow-up, the hazard ratios were 0.45 (0.24-0.86) and 0.37 (0.16-0.87) respectively. No association was observed between LCD risk and red blood cell folate level. With minimized interference from folic acid fortification, we detected a time-dependent bidirectional association that supports the dual effects of folate on the carcinogenesis of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A time-dependent bidirectional association between folate and lung cancer deaths among a national cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Blessing E Odion, Logan Cowan, Lili Yu, Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between folate and the risk of cancer remains undetermined partially due to the dynamic changes in folate intakes at the population level caused by folic acid fortification implemented in the USA and other countries. To control for the interference from fortification, we assessed the relationship between folate and lung cancer death (LCD) risk among a national cohort established years before folic acid fortification. We followed up 14 528 adults aged 19 years or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) on average for 14 years. LCD's hazard ratios were estimated by the folate levels using Cox regressions. After 192 973 person-years (py) of follow-up, 233 LCDs were recorded. The LCD rates were 1.20/1000 py, 1.14/1000 py, and 1.38/1000 py for adults with low (1st quarter), moderate (2nd and 3rd quarter), and high (4th quarter) serum folate. In the first 10 years of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.87 (1.30-6.37) for adults with moderate, and 1.56 (0.58-4.23) for adults with high serum folate, compared to adults with low serum folate. For adults who survived longer than 10 years of follow-up, the hazard ratios were 0.45 (0.24-0.86) and 0.37 (0.16-0.87) respectively. No association was observed between LCD risk and red blood cell folate level. With minimized interference from folic acid fortification, we detected a time-dependent bidirectional association that supports the dual effects of folate on the carcinogenesis of lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶酸与癌症风险之间的关系仍未确定,部分原因是由于美国和其他国家实施的叶酸强化导致人群中叶酸摄入量的动态变化。为了控制强化的干扰,我们评估了叶酸与肺癌死亡(LCD)风险之间的关系,在叶酸强化前几年建立的国家队列中。我们对参加1988-1994年全国健康与营养调查的14 528名年龄在19岁及以上的成年人进行了平均14年的随访。LCD的风险比通过叶酸水平使用Cox回归估计。经过192 973人年(py)的随访,记录了233例lcd。血清叶酸低(第1季度)、中(第2和第3季度)和高(第4季度)成人的LCD率分别为1.20/1000 py、1.14/1000 py和1.38/1000 py。在前10年的随访中,与血清叶酸含量低的成年人相比,血清叶酸含量中等的成年人调整后的风险比为2.87(1.30-6.37),血清叶酸含量高的成年人调整后的风险比为1.56(0.58-4.23)。对于存活时间超过10年的成年人,风险比分别为0.45(0.24-0.86)和0.37(0.16-0.87)。没有观察到LCD风险与红细胞叶酸水平之间的关联。在叶酸强化的干扰最小化的情况下,我们发现了一种时间依赖性的双向关联,支持叶酸对肺癌致癌的双重作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A time-dependent bidirectional association between folate and lung cancer deaths among a national cohort.

The relationship between folate and the risk of cancer remains undetermined partially due to the dynamic changes in folate intakes at the population level caused by folic acid fortification implemented in the USA and other countries. To control for the interference from fortification, we assessed the relationship between folate and lung cancer death (LCD) risk among a national cohort established years before folic acid fortification. We followed up 14 528 adults aged 19 years or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) on average for 14 years. LCD's hazard ratios were estimated by the folate levels using Cox regressions. After 192 973 person-years (py) of follow-up, 233 LCDs were recorded. The LCD rates were 1.20/1000 py, 1.14/1000 py, and 1.38/1000 py for adults with low (1st quarter), moderate (2nd and 3rd quarter), and high (4th quarter) serum folate. In the first 10 years of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.87 (1.30-6.37) for adults with moderate, and 1.56 (0.58-4.23) for adults with high serum folate, compared to adults with low serum folate. For adults who survived longer than 10 years of follow-up, the hazard ratios were 0.45 (0.24-0.86) and 0.37 (0.16-0.87) respectively. No association was observed between LCD risk and red blood cell folate level. With minimized interference from folic acid fortification, we detected a time-dependent bidirectional association that supports the dual effects of folate on the carcinogenesis of lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信