1型糖尿病患者及其护理人员使用自动胰岛素输送系统对糖尿病困扰的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dulce Canha, Virginia McMahon, Susanne Schmitz, Carine De Beaufort, Fawaz Alzaid, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Guy Fagherazzi, Gloria A Aguayo
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者及其护理人员使用自动胰岛素输送系统对糖尿病困扰的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Dulce Canha, Virginia McMahon, Susanne Schmitz, Carine De Beaufort, Fawaz Alzaid, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Guy Fagherazzi, Gloria A Aguayo","doi":"10.1111/dme.15503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is prevalent among people with diabetes. While automated insulin delivery systems (AIDs) improve glycaemic control, their impact on DD is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of AIDs on DD in people with diabetes and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We focused on people with diabetes using AIDs versus other insulin delivery systems, with DD as the outcome. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), before-after studies (BAS) and observational studies until 4 April 2024. After screening, 40 studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 5426 participants (3210 adults, 1131 paediatric and 1085 caregivers). Twenty-seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis (focusing solely on type 1 diabetes). We used random effects models by population and study design. We also conducted a subgroup analysis by age group (children vs. teenagers).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adults, eight BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant small DD reduction post-AID initiation (standardised mean difference [95% confidence intervals] -0.32 [95% CI: -0.40, -0.24] and [-0.19 (-0.27, -0.11)]). No significant changes were observed in the paediatric population. In caregivers, eleven BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant moderate DD reduction (-0.48 [95% CI: -0.78, -0.18] and (-0.22 [-0.38, -0.06])). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased benefit in parents of children compared to parents of teenagers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work suggests that AIDs is associated with a DD reduction in adults and caregivers but not in children/teenagers with type 1 diabetes. More longitudinal studies and better systematic DD assessments are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e15503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of automated insulin delivery system use on diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dulce Canha, Virginia McMahon, Susanne Schmitz, Carine De Beaufort, Fawaz Alzaid, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Guy Fagherazzi, Gloria A Aguayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.15503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is prevalent among people with diabetes. While automated insulin delivery systems (AIDs) improve glycaemic control, their impact on DD is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of AIDs on DD in people with diabetes and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We focused on people with diabetes using AIDs versus other insulin delivery systems, with DD as the outcome. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), before-after studies (BAS) and observational studies until 4 April 2024. After screening, 40 studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 5426 participants (3210 adults, 1131 paediatric and 1085 caregivers). Twenty-seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis (focusing solely on type 1 diabetes). We used random effects models by population and study design. We also conducted a subgroup analysis by age group (children vs. teenagers).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adults, eight BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant small DD reduction post-AID initiation (standardised mean difference [95% confidence intervals] -0.32 [95% CI: -0.40, -0.24] and [-0.19 (-0.27, -0.11)]). No significant changes were observed in the paediatric population. In caregivers, eleven BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant moderate DD reduction (-0.48 [95% CI: -0.78, -0.18] and (-0.22 [-0.38, -0.06])). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased benefit in parents of children compared to parents of teenagers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work suggests that AIDs is associated with a DD reduction in adults and caregivers but not in children/teenagers with type 1 diabetes. More longitudinal studies and better systematic DD assessments are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15503\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖尿病窘迫(DD)在糖尿病患者中很普遍。虽然自动胰岛素输送系统(AIDs)可以改善血糖控制,但它们对DD的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查艾滋病对糖尿病患者及其照顾者的DD的影响。方法:我们关注糖尿病患者使用艾滋病与其他胰岛素输送系统,以DD为结果。截止2024年4月4日,我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct)、前后对照研究(BAS)和观察性研究。筛选后,系统评价纳入40项研究,包括5426名参与者(3210名成人,1131名儿科和1085名护理人员)。选取27项研究进行荟萃分析(仅关注1型糖尿病)。我们采用人口和研究设计的随机效应模型。我们还按年龄组(儿童与青少年)进行了亚组分析。结果:在成人中,8项BAS和5项rct显示aid启动后DD显著减少(标准化平均差[95%置信区间]-0.32 [95% CI: -0.40, -0.24]和[-0.19(-0.27,-0.11)])。在儿科人群中没有观察到明显的变化。在护理人员中,11个BAS和5个rct显示显着中度DD减少(-0.48 [95% CI: -0.78, -0.18]和(-0.22[-0.38,-0.06]))。亚组分析显示,与青少年的父母相比,儿童的父母受益更多。结论:这项工作表明,艾滋病与成人和照顾者的DD减少有关,但与1型糖尿病儿童/青少年无关。需要更多的纵向研究和更好的系统DD评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of automated insulin delivery system use on diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Diabetes distress (DD) is prevalent among people with diabetes. While automated insulin delivery systems (AIDs) improve glycaemic control, their impact on DD is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of AIDs on DD in people with diabetes and their caregivers.

Methods: We focused on people with diabetes using AIDs versus other insulin delivery systems, with DD as the outcome. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), before-after studies (BAS) and observational studies until 4 April 2024. After screening, 40 studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 5426 participants (3210 adults, 1131 paediatric and 1085 caregivers). Twenty-seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis (focusing solely on type 1 diabetes). We used random effects models by population and study design. We also conducted a subgroup analysis by age group (children vs. teenagers).

Results: In adults, eight BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant small DD reduction post-AID initiation (standardised mean difference [95% confidence intervals] -0.32 [95% CI: -0.40, -0.24] and [-0.19 (-0.27, -0.11)]). No significant changes were observed in the paediatric population. In caregivers, eleven BAS and five RCTs indicated a significant moderate DD reduction (-0.48 [95% CI: -0.78, -0.18] and (-0.22 [-0.38, -0.06])). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased benefit in parents of children compared to parents of teenagers.

Conclusions: This work suggests that AIDs is associated with a DD reduction in adults and caregivers but not in children/teenagers with type 1 diabetes. More longitudinal studies and better systematic DD assessments are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信