不同结晶方式对二硅酸锂单晶冠边缘间隙的影响:SEM分析。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alon Shadur, Joseph Nissan, Diva Lugassy, Ariana Umansky, Eran Zenziper, Gil Ben-Izhack
{"title":"不同结晶方式对二硅酸锂单晶冠边缘间隙的影响:SEM分析。","authors":"Alon Shadur, Joseph Nissan, Diva Lugassy, Ariana Umansky, Eran Zenziper, Gil Ben-Izhack","doi":"10.3390/dj12120416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> In everyday dentistry, lithium disilicate is a valid option for single-fix partial dentures, and this material crystallization process is available with two protocols: long and short. This study's aim was to assess the effects of these two different crystallization protocols, long and short, on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate single crowns. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 24 abutment plastic teeth were scanned using an intra-oral scanner. For each plastic tooth, an identical pair of lithium disilicate crowns was milled (a total of 48 crowns) by a four-axis machine. Each paired sample was categorized into two groups: long crystallization (24 crowns) and short crystallization (24 crowns). To assess precision, each unit's marginal gap (including abutments and crowns) was meticulously measured at four specified regions using a scanning electron microscope. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and it was followed by independent <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> For the long crystallization group, the mean total marginal gap values were 42.91 ± 9.67 μm, and for the short crystallization group, the values were 43.25 ± 8.14 μm, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.894). In addition, no significant differences were found between the groups regarding the mean marginal gap measurements for all four surfaces (distal (<i>p</i> = 0.310), mesial (<i>p</i> = 0.732), palatal (<i>p</i> = 0.655), and buccal (<i>p</i> = 0.535)). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the long and short crystallization methods used for lithium disilicate single crowns demonstrated marginal gap values of less than 120 μm, which are within the clinically acceptable range, with no significant differences across any parameters between the two groups. Regarding the marginal gap value, it is recommended to use the short crystallization protocol as it is more time-efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Crystallization Protocols on Marginal Gap of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns: SEM Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alon Shadur, Joseph Nissan, Diva Lugassy, Ariana Umansky, Eran Zenziper, Gil Ben-Izhack\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12120416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> In everyday dentistry, lithium disilicate is a valid option for single-fix partial dentures, and this material crystallization process is available with two protocols: long and short. This study's aim was to assess the effects of these two different crystallization protocols, long and short, on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate single crowns. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 24 abutment plastic teeth were scanned using an intra-oral scanner. For each plastic tooth, an identical pair of lithium disilicate crowns was milled (a total of 48 crowns) by a four-axis machine. Each paired sample was categorized into two groups: long crystallization (24 crowns) and short crystallization (24 crowns). To assess precision, each unit's marginal gap (including abutments and crowns) was meticulously measured at four specified regions using a scanning electron microscope. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and it was followed by independent <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> For the long crystallization group, the mean total marginal gap values were 42.91 ± 9.67 μm, and for the short crystallization group, the values were 43.25 ± 8.14 μm, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.894). In addition, no significant differences were found between the groups regarding the mean marginal gap measurements for all four surfaces (distal (<i>p</i> = 0.310), mesial (<i>p</i> = 0.732), palatal (<i>p</i> = 0.655), and buccal (<i>p</i> = 0.535)). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the long and short crystallization methods used for lithium disilicate single crowns demonstrated marginal gap values of less than 120 μm, which are within the clinically acceptable range, with no significant differences across any parameters between the two groups. Regarding the marginal gap value, it is recommended to use the short crystallization protocol as it is more time-efficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在日常牙科中,二硅酸锂是单固定局部义齿的有效选择,这种材料结晶过程有两种方案:长和短。本研究的目的是评估这两种不同的结晶方案,长和短,对二硅酸锂单冠的边缘间隙的影响。方法:采用口腔内扫描技术对24颗基牙塑料牙进行扫描。对于每一颗塑料牙,用一台四轴机器铣一对相同的二硅酸锂牙冠(总共48个牙冠)。每个配对样品分为两组:长结晶(24冠)和短结晶(24冠)。为了评估精度,使用扫描电子显微镜在四个指定区域仔细测量每个单元的边缘间隙(包括基台和冠)。对研究变量进行Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验,结果为正态分布(p < 0.05),然后进行独立t检验(α = 0.05)。结果:长结晶组平均总边缘间隙值为42.91±9.67 μm,短结晶组平均总边缘间隙值为43.25±8.14 μm,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.894)。此外,在所有四个表面(远端(p = 0.310),中端(p = 0.732),腭(p = 0.655)和颊(p = 0.535))的平均边缘间隙测量方面,两组之间没有显着差异。结论:二硅酸锂单冠长结晶法和短结晶法的边缘间隙值均小于120 μm,均在临床可接受范围内,两组间各参数无显著差异。关于边际间隙值,建议使用短晶化方案,因为它更省时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Different Crystallization Protocols on Marginal Gap of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns: SEM Analysis.

Objective: In everyday dentistry, lithium disilicate is a valid option for single-fix partial dentures, and this material crystallization process is available with two protocols: long and short. This study's aim was to assess the effects of these two different crystallization protocols, long and short, on the marginal gap of lithium disilicate single crowns. Methods: A total of 24 abutment plastic teeth were scanned using an intra-oral scanner. For each plastic tooth, an identical pair of lithium disilicate crowns was milled (a total of 48 crowns) by a four-axis machine. Each paired sample was categorized into two groups: long crystallization (24 crowns) and short crystallization (24 crowns). To assess precision, each unit's marginal gap (including abutments and crowns) was meticulously measured at four specified regions using a scanning electron microscope. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p > 0.05), and it was followed by independent t-tests (α = 0.05). Results: For the long crystallization group, the mean total marginal gap values were 42.91 ± 9.67 μm, and for the short crystallization group, the values were 43.25 ± 8.14 μm, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.894). In addition, no significant differences were found between the groups regarding the mean marginal gap measurements for all four surfaces (distal (p = 0.310), mesial (p = 0.732), palatal (p = 0.655), and buccal (p = 0.535)). Conclusions: Both the long and short crystallization methods used for lithium disilicate single crowns demonstrated marginal gap values of less than 120 μm, which are within the clinically acceptable range, with no significant differences across any parameters between the two groups. Regarding the marginal gap value, it is recommended to use the short crystallization protocol as it is more time-efficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信