适度红肉摄入与植物性肉类替代对心理健康的影响:健康年轻人10周的随机干预

IF 3.8 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Tamlin S Conner , Nicola A Gillies , Anna Worthington , Emma N Bermingham , Jillian J Haszard , Scott O Knowles , Daniel R Bernstein , David Cameron-Smith , Andrea J Braakhuis
{"title":"适度红肉摄入与植物性肉类替代对心理健康的影响:健康年轻人10周的随机干预","authors":"Tamlin S Conner ,&nbsp;Nicola A Gillies ,&nbsp;Anna Worthington ,&nbsp;Emma N Bermingham ,&nbsp;Jillian J Haszard ,&nbsp;Scott O Knowles ,&nbsp;Daniel R Bernstein ,&nbsp;David Cameron-Smith ,&nbsp;Andrea J Braakhuis","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A healthy diet has been proposed to support good mental health, but the addition of either red meat or meat alternatives is nuanced.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to determine if psychological and physiological well-being is differentially affected by consuming recommended weekly amounts of either lean red meat or plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) supplemented with a plant-rich diet.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The trial was a parallel 2-arm randomized intervention of 10 wk duration. Eighty healthy omnivorous young adults were clustered as 40 cohabitating household pairs. Each pair was randomly assigned to consume 3 weekly servings of either fresh New Zealand beef and lamb or the equivalent PBMA. They maintained an otherwise ovo-lacto vegetarian diet, aided by a weekly meal kit and supported by engaged advice from research dietitians. Psychological measures were well-being (World Health Organization–Five Well-Being Index); depression, anxiety, and stress (depression anxiety stress scales-short form-21); and fatigue (multidimensional fatigue symptom inventory-short form) assessed weekly throughout the trial. Blood biomarkers included neurotransmitter-related compounds, iron status and vitamins B12 and D. Physical activity and sleep were estimated by a fitness wristband. Mixed effect modeling evaluated changes in each outcome over time relative to its baseline and compared the 2 interventions accounting for randomization unit clustering.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine household pairs completed the trial. Participants measured as psychologically healthy at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups in the degree of change from baseline for the psychological outcomes, nor for the majority of the circulatory markers. Differences in changes to vitamin B12 status and 3 neurotransmitter-related compounds (adenosine, agmatine, and tyrosine) from baseline to week 10 were observed between groups. Results were similar in all sensitivity analyses when adjusting for physical activity, sleep, and diet quality covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no effect on the psychological measures and limited change to physiological status when comparing a balanced diet containing either red meat or PBMAs in healthy young adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 104507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Moderate Red Meat Intake Compared With Plant-Based Meat Alternative on Psychological Well-Being: A 10-Wk Cluster Randomized Intervention in Healthy Young Adults\",\"authors\":\"Tamlin S Conner ,&nbsp;Nicola A Gillies ,&nbsp;Anna Worthington ,&nbsp;Emma N Bermingham ,&nbsp;Jillian J Haszard ,&nbsp;Scott O Knowles ,&nbsp;Daniel R Bernstein ,&nbsp;David Cameron-Smith ,&nbsp;Andrea J Braakhuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A healthy diet has been proposed to support good mental health, but the addition of either red meat or meat alternatives is nuanced.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to determine if psychological and physiological well-being is differentially affected by consuming recommended weekly amounts of either lean red meat or plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) supplemented with a plant-rich diet.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The trial was a parallel 2-arm randomized intervention of 10 wk duration. Eighty healthy omnivorous young adults were clustered as 40 cohabitating household pairs. Each pair was randomly assigned to consume 3 weekly servings of either fresh New Zealand beef and lamb or the equivalent PBMA. They maintained an otherwise ovo-lacto vegetarian diet, aided by a weekly meal kit and supported by engaged advice from research dietitians. Psychological measures were well-being (World Health Organization–Five Well-Being Index); depression, anxiety, and stress (depression anxiety stress scales-short form-21); and fatigue (multidimensional fatigue symptom inventory-short form) assessed weekly throughout the trial. Blood biomarkers included neurotransmitter-related compounds, iron status and vitamins B12 and D. Physical activity and sleep were estimated by a fitness wristband. Mixed effect modeling evaluated changes in each outcome over time relative to its baseline and compared the 2 interventions accounting for randomization unit clustering.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine household pairs completed the trial. Participants measured as psychologically healthy at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups in the degree of change from baseline for the psychological outcomes, nor for the majority of the circulatory markers. Differences in changes to vitamin B12 status and 3 neurotransmitter-related compounds (adenosine, agmatine, and tyrosine) from baseline to week 10 were observed between groups. Results were similar in all sensitivity analyses when adjusting for physical activity, sleep, and diet quality covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no effect on the psychological measures and limited change to physiological status when comparing a balanced diet containing either red meat or PBMAs in healthy young adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 104507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康的饮食已经被提议支持良好的心理健康,但添加红肉或肉类替代品是微妙的。目的:我们旨在确定每周食用推荐量的瘦红肉或植物性肉类替代品(pbma)并辅以富含植物性的饮食,是否会对心理和生理健康产生不同的影响。方法:采用平行双组随机干预,持续时间为10周。80名健康的杂食性年轻人被分成40对同居家庭。每一对被随机分配每周食用3份新鲜的新西兰牛肉和羊肉或同等的PBMA。在每周膳食包的帮助下,他们保持了蛋奶素食的饮食,并得到了研究营养师的积极建议。心理测量是幸福(世界卫生组织-五幸福指数);抑郁、焦虑和压力(抑郁焦虑压力量表-短表格-21);在整个试验过程中,每周对疲劳(多维疲劳症状清单-简短形式)进行评估。血液生物标志物包括神经递质相关化合物、铁含量、维生素B12和d。身体活动和睡眠通过健身腕带进行评估。混合效应建模评估了每个结果相对于其基线随时间的变化,并比较了考虑随机单位聚类的两种干预措施。结果:39对家庭完成了试验。参与者在基线时心理健康。在心理结果和大多数循环指标的基线变化程度上,两组之间没有显著差异。从基线到第10周,观察两组之间维生素B12状态和3种神经递质相关化合物(腺苷、agmatine和酪氨酸)变化的差异。在调整体力活动、睡眠和饮食质量协变量后,所有敏感性分析的结果相似。结论:在健康年轻人中,比较含有红肉或多溴二苯醚的均衡饮食对心理测量没有影响,对生理状态的改变有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Moderate Red Meat Intake Compared With Plant-Based Meat Alternative on Psychological Well-Being: A 10-Wk Cluster Randomized Intervention in Healthy Young Adults

Background

A healthy diet has been proposed to support good mental health, but the addition of either red meat or meat alternatives is nuanced.

Objectives

We aimed to determine if psychological and physiological well-being is differentially affected by consuming recommended weekly amounts of either lean red meat or plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) supplemented with a plant-rich diet.

Methods

The trial was a parallel 2-arm randomized intervention of 10 wk duration. Eighty healthy omnivorous young adults were clustered as 40 cohabitating household pairs. Each pair was randomly assigned to consume 3 weekly servings of either fresh New Zealand beef and lamb or the equivalent PBMA. They maintained an otherwise ovo-lacto vegetarian diet, aided by a weekly meal kit and supported by engaged advice from research dietitians. Psychological measures were well-being (World Health Organization–Five Well-Being Index); depression, anxiety, and stress (depression anxiety stress scales-short form-21); and fatigue (multidimensional fatigue symptom inventory-short form) assessed weekly throughout the trial. Blood biomarkers included neurotransmitter-related compounds, iron status and vitamins B12 and D. Physical activity and sleep were estimated by a fitness wristband. Mixed effect modeling evaluated changes in each outcome over time relative to its baseline and compared the 2 interventions accounting for randomization unit clustering.

Results

Thirty-nine household pairs completed the trial. Participants measured as psychologically healthy at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups in the degree of change from baseline for the psychological outcomes, nor for the majority of the circulatory markers. Differences in changes to vitamin B12 status and 3 neurotransmitter-related compounds (adenosine, agmatine, and tyrosine) from baseline to week 10 were observed between groups. Results were similar in all sensitivity analyses when adjusting for physical activity, sleep, and diet quality covariates.

Conclusions

There was no effect on the psychological measures and limited change to physiological status when comparing a balanced diet containing either red meat or PBMAs in healthy young adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信