改良克罗恩病排除饮食维持儿童克罗恩病缓解随机对照试验。

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rotem Sigall Boneh, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Séamus Hussey, Gemma Pujol-Muncunill, Sally Lawrence, Helena Rolandsdotter, Anthony Otley, Javier Martín-de-Carpi, Lee Abramas, Marta Herrador-López, Natalia Egea Castillo, Min Chen, Michelle Hurley, Kirsten Wingate, Ola Olen, Tintin Eurenius Rääf, Michal Yaakov, Nicolette Wierdsma, Johan Van Limbergen, Eytan Wine
{"title":"改良克罗恩病排除饮食维持儿童克罗恩病缓解随机对照试验。","authors":"Rotem Sigall Boneh, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Séamus Hussey, Gemma Pujol-Muncunill, Sally Lawrence, Helena Rolandsdotter, Anthony Otley, Javier Martín-de-Carpi, Lee Abramas, Marta Herrador-López, Natalia Egea Castillo, Min Chen, Michelle Hurley, Kirsten Wingate, Ola Olen, Tintin Eurenius Rääf, Michal Yaakov, Nicolette Wierdsma, Johan Van Limbergen, Eytan Wine","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The Crohn's Disease (CD) Exclusion Diet (CDED)+Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) is effective for inducing remission in mild-moderate CD. We assessed whether a 2-week course of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN), followed by CDED+PEN is superior to 8 weeks of EEN in sustaining clinical remission at week 14 in mild-to-severe CD and if CDED+PEN can maintain remission to week 24.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicenter, randomized-controlled trial compared 2-weeks of EEN (Modulen®IBD) followed by 3 phases of the CDED+PEN (henceforth CDED) to 8 weeks of EEN, followed by PEN with free diet up to week 24 (henceforth EEN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 64 eligible patients, 56 were randomized (target recruitment failed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to an underpowered study); 30 patients to CDED and 26 to EEN. The primary endpoint at week 14 showed no significant difference between the groups, with sustained corticosteroid-free remission in 21/30(70%) for CDED compared to 16/26(61.5%) for EEN, (p=0.5). At week 8, clinical remission was achieved in 23/30(77%) of CDED versus 14/26(54%) of EEN patients (p=0.07), and 18/30(60%) of CDED versus 11/26(42%) of EEN patients maintained clinical remission to week 24 (p=0.18). BMI Z-score significantly improved in the CDED group but not in EEN group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study was underpowered to show whether CDED was superior to EEN in sustaining remission. However, two weeks of EEN followed by CDED was effective in inducing remission in CD, with most CDED patients maintaining remission up to 24 weeks. Despite dietary restrictions for 24 weeks, the BMI Z-score improved significantly in the CDED group but not in the EEN group (NCT02843100).</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet Maintains Remission in Pediatric Crohn's Disease; Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Sigall Boneh, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Séamus Hussey, Gemma Pujol-Muncunill, Sally Lawrence, Helena Rolandsdotter, Anthony Otley, Javier Martín-de-Carpi, Lee Abramas, Marta Herrador-López, Natalia Egea Castillo, Min Chen, Michelle Hurley, Kirsten Wingate, Ola Olen, Tintin Eurenius Rääf, Michal Yaakov, Nicolette Wierdsma, Johan Van Limbergen, Eytan Wine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The Crohn's Disease (CD) Exclusion Diet (CDED)+Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) is effective for inducing remission in mild-moderate CD. We assessed whether a 2-week course of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN), followed by CDED+PEN is superior to 8 weeks of EEN in sustaining clinical remission at week 14 in mild-to-severe CD and if CDED+PEN can maintain remission to week 24.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicenter, randomized-controlled trial compared 2-weeks of EEN (Modulen®IBD) followed by 3 phases of the CDED+PEN (henceforth CDED) to 8 weeks of EEN, followed by PEN with free diet up to week 24 (henceforth EEN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 64 eligible patients, 56 were randomized (target recruitment failed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to an underpowered study); 30 patients to CDED and 26 to EEN. The primary endpoint at week 14 showed no significant difference between the groups, with sustained corticosteroid-free remission in 21/30(70%) for CDED compared to 16/26(61.5%) for EEN, (p=0.5). At week 8, clinical remission was achieved in 23/30(77%) of CDED versus 14/26(54%) of EEN patients (p=0.07), and 18/30(60%) of CDED versus 11/26(42%) of EEN patients maintained clinical remission to week 24 (p=0.18). BMI Z-score significantly improved in the CDED group but not in EEN group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study was underpowered to show whether CDED was superior to EEN in sustaining remission. However, two weeks of EEN followed by CDED was effective in inducing remission in CD, with most CDED patients maintaining remission up to 24 weeks. Despite dietary restrictions for 24 weeks, the BMI Z-score improved significantly in the CDED group but not in the EEN group (NCT02843100).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:克罗恩病(CD)排他饮食(CDED)+部分肠内营养(PEN)对诱导轻度至中度CD缓解有效。我们评估了2周的排他肠内营养(EEN),然后CDED+PEN是否优于8周的EEN,在轻度至重度CD中维持14周的临床缓解,以及CDED+PEN是否可以维持缓解至24周。方法:这项国际、多中心、随机对照试验比较了2周的EEN (Modulen®IBD),然后是3期的CDED+PEN(以下简称CDED),到8周的EEN,然后是自由饮食的PEN,直到第24周(以下简称EEN)。结果:在64例符合条件的患者中,56例是随机的(由于COVID-19大流行,目标招募失败,导致研究力度不足);CDED 30例,EEN 26例。第14周的主要终点显示两组间无显著差异,CDED患者的21/30(70%)持续无皮质类固醇缓解,而EEN患者的16/26(61.5%)持续无皮质类固醇缓解,(p=0.5)。在第8周,23/30(77%)的CDED患者达到临床缓解,14/26(54%)的EEN患者达到临床缓解(p=0.07), 18/30(60%)的CDED患者和11/26(42%)的EEN患者在第24周保持临床缓解(p=0.18)。CDED组BMI Z-score有明显改善,EEN组无明显改善。结论:该研究不足以证明CDED在维持缓解方面是否优于EEN。然而,两周的EEN和CDED在诱导CD缓解方面是有效的,大多数CDED患者的缓解可以维持到24周。尽管饮食限制了24周,CDED组的BMI z评分显著改善,但EEN组(NCT02843100)没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet Maintains Remission in Pediatric Crohn's Disease; Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background & aims: The Crohn's Disease (CD) Exclusion Diet (CDED)+Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) is effective for inducing remission in mild-moderate CD. We assessed whether a 2-week course of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN), followed by CDED+PEN is superior to 8 weeks of EEN in sustaining clinical remission at week 14 in mild-to-severe CD and if CDED+PEN can maintain remission to week 24.

Methods: This international, multicenter, randomized-controlled trial compared 2-weeks of EEN (Modulen®IBD) followed by 3 phases of the CDED+PEN (henceforth CDED) to 8 weeks of EEN, followed by PEN with free diet up to week 24 (henceforth EEN).

Results: Out of 64 eligible patients, 56 were randomized (target recruitment failed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to an underpowered study); 30 patients to CDED and 26 to EEN. The primary endpoint at week 14 showed no significant difference between the groups, with sustained corticosteroid-free remission in 21/30(70%) for CDED compared to 16/26(61.5%) for EEN, (p=0.5). At week 8, clinical remission was achieved in 23/30(77%) of CDED versus 14/26(54%) of EEN patients (p=0.07), and 18/30(60%) of CDED versus 11/26(42%) of EEN patients maintained clinical remission to week 24 (p=0.18). BMI Z-score significantly improved in the CDED group but not in EEN group.

Conclusions: The study was underpowered to show whether CDED was superior to EEN in sustaining remission. However, two weeks of EEN followed by CDED was effective in inducing remission in CD, with most CDED patients maintaining remission up to 24 weeks. Despite dietary restrictions for 24 weeks, the BMI Z-score improved significantly in the CDED group but not in the EEN group (NCT02843100).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信