确定混杂因素并估计出生地点对特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的因果影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir
{"title":"确定混杂因素并估计出生地点对特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的因果影响。","authors":"Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02827-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In causal analyses, some third factor may distort the relationship between the exposure and the outcome variables under study, which gives spurious results. In this case, treatment groups and control groups that receive and do not receive the exposure are different from one another in some other essential variables, called confounders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Place of birth was used as exposure variable and age-specific childhood vaccination status was used as outcome variables. Three approaches of confounder selection techniques such as all pre-treatment covariates, outcome cause covariates, and common cause covariates were proposed. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the propensity score for inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) confounder adjustment techniques. The proportional odds model was used to estimate the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination. To validate the result obtained from observed data, we used a plasmode simulation of resampling 1000 samples from actual data 500 times.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Outcome cause and common cause confounder identification techniques gave comparable results in terms of treatment effect in the plasmode data. However, outcome causes that contain common causes and predictors of the outcome confounder identification gave relatively better treatment effect results. The treatment effect result in the IPTW confounder adjustment method was better than that of the regression adjustment method. The effect of place of birth on log odds of cumulative probability of age-specific childhood vaccination was 0.36 with odds ratio of 1.43 for higher level vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to use plasmode simulation data to validate the reproducibility of the proposed methods on the observed data. It is important to use outcome-cause covariates to adjust their confounding effect on the outcome. Using inverse probability treatment weighting gives unbiased treatment effect results as compared to the regression method of confounder adjustment. Institutional delivery increases the likelihood of childhood vaccination at the recommended schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of confounders and estimating the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02827-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In causal analyses, some third factor may distort the relationship between the exposure and the outcome variables under study, which gives spurious results. In this case, treatment groups and control groups that receive and do not receive the exposure are different from one another in some other essential variables, called confounders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Place of birth was used as exposure variable and age-specific childhood vaccination status was used as outcome variables. Three approaches of confounder selection techniques such as all pre-treatment covariates, outcome cause covariates, and common cause covariates were proposed. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the propensity score for inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) confounder adjustment techniques. The proportional odds model was used to estimate the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination. To validate the result obtained from observed data, we used a plasmode simulation of resampling 1000 samples from actual data 500 times.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Outcome cause and common cause confounder identification techniques gave comparable results in terms of treatment effect in the plasmode data. However, outcome causes that contain common causes and predictors of the outcome confounder identification gave relatively better treatment effect results. The treatment effect result in the IPTW confounder adjustment method was better than that of the regression adjustment method. The effect of place of birth on log odds of cumulative probability of age-specific childhood vaccination was 0.36 with odds ratio of 1.43 for higher level vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to use plasmode simulation data to validate the reproducibility of the proposed methods on the observed data. It is important to use outcome-cause covariates to adjust their confounding effect on the outcome. Using inverse probability treatment weighting gives unbiased treatment effect results as compared to the regression method of confounder adjustment. Institutional delivery increases the likelihood of childhood vaccination at the recommended schedule.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02827-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02827-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在因果分析中,某些第三因素可能会扭曲暴露与所研究的结果变量之间的关系,从而给出虚假的结果。在这种情况下,接受和未接受辐射的治疗组和对照组在其他一些基本变量上是不同的,这些变量被称为混杂因素。方法:以出生地点作为暴露变量,以特定年龄的儿童疫苗接种状况作为结局变量。提出了三种混杂因素选择方法,即所有预处理协变量、结局原因协变量和共同原因协变量。多元逻辑回归用于估计反概率处理加权(IPTW)混杂校正技术的倾向得分。使用比例赔率模型来估计出生地点对特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的因果影响。为了验证从观测数据中获得的结果,我们使用了从实际数据中重新采样1000个样本500次的等离子模模拟。结果:结果原因和共同原因混杂识别技术在plasmode数据的治疗效果方面给出了可比的结果。然而,包含常见原因的结局原因和结局混杂因素识别的预测因素,则给出了相对较好的治疗效果结果。IPTW混杂校正法的处理效果优于回归校正法。出生地点对儿童期特定年龄疫苗接种累积概率的对数比值的影响为0.36,较高水平疫苗接种的比值比为1.43。结论:有必要使用等离子体模模拟数据来验证所提出方法在观测数据上的可重复性。重要的是使用结果-原因协变量来调整它们对结果的混淆效应。与混杂因素调整的回归方法相比,使用逆概率处理加权可以得到无偏的处理效果结果。机构提供增加了按推荐时间表接种儿童疫苗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of confounders and estimating the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination.

Background: In causal analyses, some third factor may distort the relationship between the exposure and the outcome variables under study, which gives spurious results. In this case, treatment groups and control groups that receive and do not receive the exposure are different from one another in some other essential variables, called confounders.

Method: Place of birth was used as exposure variable and age-specific childhood vaccination status was used as outcome variables. Three approaches of confounder selection techniques such as all pre-treatment covariates, outcome cause covariates, and common cause covariates were proposed. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the propensity score for inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) confounder adjustment techniques. The proportional odds model was used to estimate the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination. To validate the result obtained from observed data, we used a plasmode simulation of resampling 1000 samples from actual data 500 times.

Result: Outcome cause and common cause confounder identification techniques gave comparable results in terms of treatment effect in the plasmode data. However, outcome causes that contain common causes and predictors of the outcome confounder identification gave relatively better treatment effect results. The treatment effect result in the IPTW confounder adjustment method was better than that of the regression adjustment method. The effect of place of birth on log odds of cumulative probability of age-specific childhood vaccination was 0.36 with odds ratio of 1.43 for higher level vaccination status.

Conclusion: It is essential to use plasmode simulation data to validate the reproducibility of the proposed methods on the observed data. It is important to use outcome-cause covariates to adjust their confounding effect on the outcome. Using inverse probability treatment weighting gives unbiased treatment effect results as compared to the regression method of confounder adjustment. Institutional delivery increases the likelihood of childhood vaccination at the recommended schedule.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信