Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng
{"title":"从单细胞水平探讨IUA患者TCRA后雌激素治疗效果的分子机制。","authors":"Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng","doi":"10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9164,"journal":{"name":"Biology Direct","volume":"19 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the molecular mechanism of estrogen therapy effectiveness after TCRA in IUA patients at single-cell level.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Direct\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the molecular mechanism of estrogen therapy effectiveness after TCRA in IUA patients at single-cell level.
Background: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.
Results: Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.
Conclusions: We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.
期刊介绍:
Biology Direct serves the life science research community as an open access, peer-reviewed online journal, providing authors and readers with an alternative to the traditional model of peer review. Biology Direct considers original research articles, hypotheses, comments, discovery notes and reviews in subject areas currently identified as those most conducive to the open review approach, primarily those with a significant non-experimental component.