患者如何确定他们的吸入器是空的?从对回收吸入器的分析和对患者的调查中得出的见解。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Anna C Murphy, Will Carroll, Marissa Gotsell, Charles Potter, Jennifer K Quint, Rachel Malone
{"title":"患者如何确定他们的吸入器是空的?从对回收吸入器的分析和对患者的调查中得出的见解。","authors":"Anna C Murphy, Will Carroll, Marissa Gotsell, Charles Potter, Jennifer K Quint, Rachel Malone","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhalers are widely used for the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is little knowledge about the extent to which an inhaler is used and when it is disposed of, despite the implications for an individual's health (when used beyond the recommended number of doses (overused)), and medicine wastage, healthcare costs and the environment (when discarded with remaining doses (underused)). To explore inhaler use, we assessed the number of doses remaining in pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) returned via a Chiesi Inhaler Recycling scheme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>pMDIs were dismantled, and components recycled where possible. Each canister was weighed and the mass of the formulation remaining was calculated. pMDIs were categorised based on number of doses remaining (underused, used, empty (indicating correct use) and overused) and by dose counter presence/absence. A separate online survey was used to obtain patient feedback on inhaler use and disposal behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2614 pMDIs were analysed (55.9% maintenance, 44.1% reliever inhalers); 1015 (38.8%) had an integrated dose counter. The proportion of pMDIs returned empty was greater for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (51.3% vs 25.1%; p<0.0001); the proportion of pMDIs returned underused was lower for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (5.2% vs 33.2%; p<0.0001). The proportion of pMDIs returned overused was substantial and similar for devices with and without dose counters (34.0% vs 23.2%; p>0.01). Most respondents (55.2%) using devices without a dose counter reported that they were not confident in identifying when their inhaler was empty. Furthermore, many respondents (20.6%) who used inhalers with a dose counter reported continued use beyond 'zero'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that many inhalers are returned underused or overused, with inadequate knowledge among patients about the number of therapeutic doses remaining in the device and appropriate inhaler disposal. These have concerning implications for patient health and the environment and highlight a need for high-quality education for patients and healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do patients determine when their inhaler is empty? Insights from an analysis of returned inhalers and a patient survey.\",\"authors\":\"Anna C Murphy, Will Carroll, Marissa Gotsell, Charles Potter, Jennifer K Quint, Rachel Malone\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhalers are widely used for the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is little knowledge about the extent to which an inhaler is used and when it is disposed of, despite the implications for an individual's health (when used beyond the recommended number of doses (overused)), and medicine wastage, healthcare costs and the environment (when discarded with remaining doses (underused)). To explore inhaler use, we assessed the number of doses remaining in pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) returned via a Chiesi Inhaler Recycling scheme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>pMDIs were dismantled, and components recycled where possible. Each canister was weighed and the mass of the formulation remaining was calculated. pMDIs were categorised based on number of doses remaining (underused, used, empty (indicating correct use) and overused) and by dose counter presence/absence. A separate online survey was used to obtain patient feedback on inhaler use and disposal behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2614 pMDIs were analysed (55.9% maintenance, 44.1% reliever inhalers); 1015 (38.8%) had an integrated dose counter. The proportion of pMDIs returned empty was greater for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (51.3% vs 25.1%; p<0.0001); the proportion of pMDIs returned underused was lower for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (5.2% vs 33.2%; p<0.0001). The proportion of pMDIs returned overused was substantial and similar for devices with and without dose counters (34.0% vs 23.2%; p>0.01). Most respondents (55.2%) using devices without a dose counter reported that they were not confident in identifying when their inhaler was empty. Furthermore, many respondents (20.6%) who used inhalers with a dose counter reported continued use beyond 'zero'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that many inhalers are returned underused or overused, with inadequate knowledge among patients about the number of therapeutic doses remaining in the device and appropriate inhaler disposal. These have concerning implications for patient health and the environment and highlight a need for high-quality education for patients and healthcare professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751839/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002579\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吸入器被广泛用于哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗。然而,尽管吸入器对个人健康(当使用超过建议剂量时(过度使用))以及药物浪费、医疗保健费用和环境(当与剩余剂量一起丢弃时(使用不足))有影响,但人们对吸入器的使用程度和处置时间知之甚少。为了探索吸入器的使用情况,我们评估了通过Chiesi吸入器回收计划回收的加压计量吸入器(pmdi)中剩余剂量的数量。方法:拆解pmdi,尽可能回收部件。称量每个罐子的重量,并计算剩余制剂的质量。pmdi根据剩余剂量数(未充分使用、已使用、空(表明正确使用)和过量使用)和剂量计数器是否存在进行分类。一项单独的在线调查用于获取患者对吸入器使用和处置行为的反馈。结果:总共分析了2614个pmdi(55.9%为维持吸入器,44.1%为缓解吸入器);1015例(38.8%)有综合剂量计数器。有剂量计数器的吸入器pmdi返回空的比例大于没有剂量计数器的吸入器(51.3% vs 25.1%;p0.01)。使用没有剂量计数器的装置的大多数答复者(55.2%)报告说,他们对确定吸入器何时为空没有信心。此外,许多使用带剂量计数器的吸入器的答复者(20.6%)报告继续使用超过“零”。结论:我们的研究表明,许多吸入器未充分使用或过度使用,患者对设备中剩余治疗剂量的数量和适当的吸入器处置了解不足。这些问题对患者健康和环境产生了令人关切的影响,并突出表明需要为患者和保健专业人员提供高质量的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do patients determine when their inhaler is empty? Insights from an analysis of returned inhalers and a patient survey.

Background: Inhalers are widely used for the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is little knowledge about the extent to which an inhaler is used and when it is disposed of, despite the implications for an individual's health (when used beyond the recommended number of doses (overused)), and medicine wastage, healthcare costs and the environment (when discarded with remaining doses (underused)). To explore inhaler use, we assessed the number of doses remaining in pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) returned via a Chiesi Inhaler Recycling scheme.

Methods: pMDIs were dismantled, and components recycled where possible. Each canister was weighed and the mass of the formulation remaining was calculated. pMDIs were categorised based on number of doses remaining (underused, used, empty (indicating correct use) and overused) and by dose counter presence/absence. A separate online survey was used to obtain patient feedback on inhaler use and disposal behaviours.

Results: Overall, 2614 pMDIs were analysed (55.9% maintenance, 44.1% reliever inhalers); 1015 (38.8%) had an integrated dose counter. The proportion of pMDIs returned empty was greater for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (51.3% vs 25.1%; p<0.0001); the proportion of pMDIs returned underused was lower for inhalers with dose counters than for those without (5.2% vs 33.2%; p<0.0001). The proportion of pMDIs returned overused was substantial and similar for devices with and without dose counters (34.0% vs 23.2%; p>0.01). Most respondents (55.2%) using devices without a dose counter reported that they were not confident in identifying when their inhaler was empty. Furthermore, many respondents (20.6%) who used inhalers with a dose counter reported continued use beyond 'zero'.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that many inhalers are returned underused or overused, with inadequate knowledge among patients about the number of therapeutic doses remaining in the device and appropriate inhaler disposal. These have concerning implications for patient health and the environment and highlight a need for high-quality education for patients and healthcare professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信