利用半嵌套条形码PCR从粪便样本中增强囊虫亚型:基于ngs方法的验证。

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Carlos Nieto-Clavijo, Liliana Morales, Andrés Delgado-Aldana, Paula C Hernández, Isabel Torres-Molina, Amanda Gonzalez-Cuiza, Fabián Cortés-Muñoz, Jacqueline Chaparro-Olaya
{"title":"利用半嵌套条形码PCR从粪便样本中增强囊虫亚型:基于ngs方法的验证。","authors":"Carlos Nieto-Clavijo, Liliana Morales, Andrés Delgado-Aldana, Paula C Hernández, Isabel Torres-Molina, Amanda Gonzalez-Cuiza, Fabián Cortés-Muñoz, Jacqueline Chaparro-Olaya","doi":"10.1080/07366205.2024.2442835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2006, a PCR method was introduced to subtype <i>Blastocystis</i> by Sanger sequencing of an ≈610 bp amplicon of the 18S rRNA gene. This method, known as barcoding-PCR, has become widespread, although the primer pair used can amplify non-<i>Blastocystis</i> sequences, which can result in false positives. Barcoding-PCR is most effective with DNA extracted from <i>Blastocystis</i> cultures, limiting its sensitivity when used directly with stool samples. As a result, barcoding-PCR can sometimes yield negative results for stool samples confirmed as <i>Blastocystis</i>-positive by microscopy. To improve subtyping from stool-derived DNA, we developed a Semi-Nested barcode PCR that amplifies the barcoding region in a second reaction. Our study shows that this Semi-Nested approach outperforms classical barcoding-PCR, detecting <i>Blastocystis</i> more reliably from stool samples with stronger gel signals and no false positives. This was confirmed by near-complete concordance (68/70 samples) with the Santin-PCR coupled to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) as reference standard for <i>Blastocystis</i> subtyping. Of particular interest, one amplicon matched the only previous report of ST35, marking this as the second global detection of ST35 and the first in Colombia. Overall, Semi-Nested barcoded PCR offers a more robust and sensitive alternative compared to classical barcoding-PCR for subtyping <i>Blastocystis</i> directly from stool samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":8945,"journal":{"name":"BioTechniques","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced <i>Blastocystis</i> subtyping from stool samples using semi-nested barcode PCR: validation with an NGS-based approach.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Nieto-Clavijo, Liliana Morales, Andrés Delgado-Aldana, Paula C Hernández, Isabel Torres-Molina, Amanda Gonzalez-Cuiza, Fabián Cortés-Muñoz, Jacqueline Chaparro-Olaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07366205.2024.2442835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2006, a PCR method was introduced to subtype <i>Blastocystis</i> by Sanger sequencing of an ≈610 bp amplicon of the 18S rRNA gene. This method, known as barcoding-PCR, has become widespread, although the primer pair used can amplify non-<i>Blastocystis</i> sequences, which can result in false positives. Barcoding-PCR is most effective with DNA extracted from <i>Blastocystis</i> cultures, limiting its sensitivity when used directly with stool samples. As a result, barcoding-PCR can sometimes yield negative results for stool samples confirmed as <i>Blastocystis</i>-positive by microscopy. To improve subtyping from stool-derived DNA, we developed a Semi-Nested barcode PCR that amplifies the barcoding region in a second reaction. Our study shows that this Semi-Nested approach outperforms classical barcoding-PCR, detecting <i>Blastocystis</i> more reliably from stool samples with stronger gel signals and no false positives. This was confirmed by near-complete concordance (68/70 samples) with the Santin-PCR coupled to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) as reference standard for <i>Blastocystis</i> subtyping. Of particular interest, one amplicon matched the only previous report of ST35, marking this as the second global detection of ST35 and the first in Colombia. Overall, Semi-Nested barcoded PCR offers a more robust and sensitive alternative compared to classical barcoding-PCR for subtyping <i>Blastocystis</i> directly from stool samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioTechniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioTechniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2024.2442835\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioTechniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2024.2442835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2006年,通过Sanger测序18S rRNA基因的约610 bp扩增子,引入了一种PCR方法对Blastocystis亚型进行检测。这种被称为条形码- pcr的方法已经广泛应用,尽管使用的引物对可以扩增非囊胚序列,这可能导致假阳性。条形码- pcr对从囊胚培养物中提取的DNA最有效,当直接用于粪便样本时限制了其敏感性。因此,对于显微镜下证实囊虫阳性的粪便样本,条形码- pcr有时会产生阴性结果。为了提高粪便DNA的分型,我们开发了一种半嵌套条形码PCR,可以在第二次反应中扩增条形码区域。我们的研究表明,这种半嵌套方法优于经典的条形码- pcr,从粪便样本中检测囊胚更可靠,凝胶信号更强,没有假阳性。68/70份样本的stin - pcr与新一代测序(NGS)作为囊胚分型参考标准的配对结果几乎完全一致,证实了这一点。特别有趣的是,一个扩增子与之前唯一的ST35报告相匹配,这标志着这是第二次全球检测到ST35,第一次在哥伦比亚检测到。总的来说,与传统的条形码PCR相比,半巢式条形码PCR在直接从粪便样本中分型囊虫方面提供了一种更强大、更敏感的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced Blastocystis subtyping from stool samples using semi-nested barcode PCR: validation with an NGS-based approach.

In 2006, a PCR method was introduced to subtype Blastocystis by Sanger sequencing of an ≈610 bp amplicon of the 18S rRNA gene. This method, known as barcoding-PCR, has become widespread, although the primer pair used can amplify non-Blastocystis sequences, which can result in false positives. Barcoding-PCR is most effective with DNA extracted from Blastocystis cultures, limiting its sensitivity when used directly with stool samples. As a result, barcoding-PCR can sometimes yield negative results for stool samples confirmed as Blastocystis-positive by microscopy. To improve subtyping from stool-derived DNA, we developed a Semi-Nested barcode PCR that amplifies the barcoding region in a second reaction. Our study shows that this Semi-Nested approach outperforms classical barcoding-PCR, detecting Blastocystis more reliably from stool samples with stronger gel signals and no false positives. This was confirmed by near-complete concordance (68/70 samples) with the Santin-PCR coupled to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) as reference standard for Blastocystis subtyping. Of particular interest, one amplicon matched the only previous report of ST35, marking this as the second global detection of ST35 and the first in Colombia. Overall, Semi-Nested barcoded PCR offers a more robust and sensitive alternative compared to classical barcoding-PCR for subtyping Blastocystis directly from stool samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioTechniques
BioTechniques 工程技术-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BioTechniques is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original laboratory methods, related technical and software tools, and methods-oriented review articles that are of broad interest to professional life scientists, as well as to scientists from other disciplines (e.g., chemistry, physics, computer science, plant and agricultural science and climate science) interested in life science applications for their technologies. Since 1983, BioTechniques has been a leading peer-reviewed journal for methods-related research. The journal considers: Reports describing innovative new methods, platforms and software, substantive modifications to existing methods, or innovative applications of existing methods, techniques & tools to new models or scientific questions Descriptions of technical tools that facilitate the design or performance of experiments or data analysis, such as software and simple laboratory devices Surveys of technical approaches related to broad fields of research Reviews discussing advancements in techniques and methods related to broad fields of research Letters to the Editor and Expert Opinions highlighting interesting observations or cautionary tales concerning experimental design, methodology or analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信