图像引导下经皮肠系膜活检:诊断率和安全性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sarah M Daggett, Perry J Pickhardt, Matthew Elissa, Elizabeth S Richards, Ryan Zea, Meghan G Lubner
{"title":"图像引导下经皮肠系膜活检:诊断率和安全性。","authors":"Sarah M Daggett, Perry J Pickhardt, Matthew Elissa, Elizabeth S Richards, Ryan Zea, Meghan G Lubner","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04706-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety profile of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of mesenteric lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials, methods, and procedures: </strong>Image-guided percutaneous biopsies of the mesentery at a single institution from 2000 to 2022 were identified and reviewed. Relevant demographic and procedural data were abstracted from the medical record. Surgical pathology was reviewed to evaluate if the biopsy was diagnostic and concordant with the patient's final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety five patients (mean age, 62.6 ± 14.; M/F, 113/82; mean BMI, 30.4) underwent mesenteric biopsy procedure. Of these, 173 (89%) were performed using ultrasound and 22 (11%) were performed using CT or a hybrid/combined approach. Core needle biopsy was used in 164 (84%) patients, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was used in 21 (11%), and both were used 10 (5%). Mean/median number of biopsy passes was 2.8 ± 1.3 and 3, respectively (core mean 2.7 ± 1.2; FNA mean 3.4 ± 1.5). Average lesion size was 5.3 ± 4.4 cm in the long axis and 2.9 ± 2.0 cm in the target plane. Diagnostic yield of core biopsies was 97.7% (n = 170/174) and FNA was 80.6% (n = 25/31) for an overall combined yield of 96.4% (n = 188/195). Of diagnostic biopsies, 95.7% (n = 180/188) were concordant with the final diagnosis, 70.8% (n = 138) of which were considered malignant. Overall concordant diagnostic rate was 180/195 (92.3%). Neuroendocrine tumor pathology was the only factor associated with lower diagnostic yield (13/15, 87%). For all biopsies, average shortest skin-to-target-distance on CT was 6.3 ± 2.8 cm, decreased to 4.1 ± 1.3 cm with US compression (approximately 35% reduction, p < 0.001). Additionally, ultrasound created a safe path not available on CT in 29 (15%) biopsies. Moderate IV sedation was used in 91.3% (n = 178) of mesenteric procedures. Complications occurred in 11 (5.6%) biopsies, and all were considered minor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This represents a large cohort of image-guided percutaneous biopsies of mesenteric lesions with the majority representing core biopsy performed under US guidance. This technique offers high diagnostic yield and a favorable safety profile for tissue diagnosis. Furthermore, compression with ultrasound reduced skin-to-target distance by 35% and created a biopsy path that would not be possible on CT in 15% of US cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-guided percutaneous mesenteric biopsy: diagnostic yield and safety profile.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M Daggett, Perry J Pickhardt, Matthew Elissa, Elizabeth S Richards, Ryan Zea, Meghan G Lubner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04706-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety profile of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of mesenteric lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials, methods, and procedures: </strong>Image-guided percutaneous biopsies of the mesentery at a single institution from 2000 to 2022 were identified and reviewed. Relevant demographic and procedural data were abstracted from the medical record. Surgical pathology was reviewed to evaluate if the biopsy was diagnostic and concordant with the patient's final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety five patients (mean age, 62.6 ± 14.; M/F, 113/82; mean BMI, 30.4) underwent mesenteric biopsy procedure. Of these, 173 (89%) were performed using ultrasound and 22 (11%) were performed using CT or a hybrid/combined approach. Core needle biopsy was used in 164 (84%) patients, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was used in 21 (11%), and both were used 10 (5%). Mean/median number of biopsy passes was 2.8 ± 1.3 and 3, respectively (core mean 2.7 ± 1.2; FNA mean 3.4 ± 1.5). Average lesion size was 5.3 ± 4.4 cm in the long axis and 2.9 ± 2.0 cm in the target plane. Diagnostic yield of core biopsies was 97.7% (n = 170/174) and FNA was 80.6% (n = 25/31) for an overall combined yield of 96.4% (n = 188/195). Of diagnostic biopsies, 95.7% (n = 180/188) were concordant with the final diagnosis, 70.8% (n = 138) of which were considered malignant. Overall concordant diagnostic rate was 180/195 (92.3%). Neuroendocrine tumor pathology was the only factor associated with lower diagnostic yield (13/15, 87%). For all biopsies, average shortest skin-to-target-distance on CT was 6.3 ± 2.8 cm, decreased to 4.1 ± 1.3 cm with US compression (approximately 35% reduction, p < 0.001). Additionally, ultrasound created a safe path not available on CT in 29 (15%) biopsies. Moderate IV sedation was used in 91.3% (n = 178) of mesenteric procedures. Complications occurred in 11 (5.6%) biopsies, and all were considered minor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This represents a large cohort of image-guided percutaneous biopsies of mesenteric lesions with the majority representing core biopsy performed under US guidance. This technique offers high diagnostic yield and a favorable safety profile for tissue diagnosis. Furthermore, compression with ultrasound reduced skin-to-target distance by 35% and created a biopsy path that would not be possible on CT in 15% of US cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04706-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04706-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价经皮影像引导下肠系膜病变活检的诊断率和安全性。材料、方法和程序:确定并回顾了2000年至2022年在单一机构进行的图像引导下经皮肠系膜活检。从病历中提取相关的人口统计和程序数据。手术病理回顾,以评估是否活检诊断和患者的最终诊断一致。结果:195例患者(平均年龄62.6±14岁;M / F, 113/82;平均BMI, 30.4)行肠系膜活检。其中,173例(89%)采用超声,22例(11%)采用CT或混合/联合入路。164例(84%)患者采用芯针活检,21例(11%)患者采用细针穿刺(FNA), 10例(5%)患者采用两种方法。平均/中位活检次数分别为2.8±1.3次和3次(核心平均2.7±1.2次;FNA平均值3.4±1.5)。病灶长轴平均大小为5.3±4.4 cm,靶平面平均大小为2.9±2.0 cm。核心活检的诊断率为97.7% (n = 170/174), FNA为80.6% (n = 25/31),总诊断率为96.4% (n = 188/195)。诊断活检95.7% (n = 180/188)与最终诊断一致,其中70.8% (n = 138)为恶性。总体一致性诊断率为180/195(92.3%)。神经内分泌肿瘤病理是唯一与低诊断率相关的因素(13/15,87%)。对于所有活检,CT上皮肤到目标的平均最短距离为6.3±2.8 cm,在超声压迫下减少到4.1±1.3 cm(约减少35%),p结论:这代表了大量图像引导下的肠系膜病变经皮活检,其中大多数是在超声引导下进行的核心活检。该技术为组织诊断提供了高诊断率和良好的安全性。此外,超声压缩将皮肤到目标的距离缩短了35%,并创建了一个活检路径,这在美国15%的病例中是CT无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image-guided percutaneous mesenteric biopsy: diagnostic yield and safety profile.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety profile of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of mesenteric lesions.

Materials, methods, and procedures: Image-guided percutaneous biopsies of the mesentery at a single institution from 2000 to 2022 were identified and reviewed. Relevant demographic and procedural data were abstracted from the medical record. Surgical pathology was reviewed to evaluate if the biopsy was diagnostic and concordant with the patient's final diagnosis.

Results: One hundred ninety five patients (mean age, 62.6 ± 14.; M/F, 113/82; mean BMI, 30.4) underwent mesenteric biopsy procedure. Of these, 173 (89%) were performed using ultrasound and 22 (11%) were performed using CT or a hybrid/combined approach. Core needle biopsy was used in 164 (84%) patients, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was used in 21 (11%), and both were used 10 (5%). Mean/median number of biopsy passes was 2.8 ± 1.3 and 3, respectively (core mean 2.7 ± 1.2; FNA mean 3.4 ± 1.5). Average lesion size was 5.3 ± 4.4 cm in the long axis and 2.9 ± 2.0 cm in the target plane. Diagnostic yield of core biopsies was 97.7% (n = 170/174) and FNA was 80.6% (n = 25/31) for an overall combined yield of 96.4% (n = 188/195). Of diagnostic biopsies, 95.7% (n = 180/188) were concordant with the final diagnosis, 70.8% (n = 138) of which were considered malignant. Overall concordant diagnostic rate was 180/195 (92.3%). Neuroendocrine tumor pathology was the only factor associated with lower diagnostic yield (13/15, 87%). For all biopsies, average shortest skin-to-target-distance on CT was 6.3 ± 2.8 cm, decreased to 4.1 ± 1.3 cm with US compression (approximately 35% reduction, p < 0.001). Additionally, ultrasound created a safe path not available on CT in 29 (15%) biopsies. Moderate IV sedation was used in 91.3% (n = 178) of mesenteric procedures. Complications occurred in 11 (5.6%) biopsies, and all were considered minor.

Conclusion: This represents a large cohort of image-guided percutaneous biopsies of mesenteric lesions with the majority representing core biopsy performed under US guidance. This technique offers high diagnostic yield and a favorable safety profile for tissue diagnosis. Furthermore, compression with ultrasound reduced skin-to-target distance by 35% and created a biopsy path that would not be possible on CT in 15% of US cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信