用多种方法估算地下水补给:阿法尔西部裂谷边缘南段及相关裂谷底

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dereje Gidafie, Dessie Nedaw, Tilahun Azagegn, Bekele Abebe, Alper Baba
{"title":"用多种方法估算地下水补给:阿法尔西部裂谷边缘南段及相关裂谷底","authors":"Dereje Gidafie,&nbsp;Dessie Nedaw,&nbsp;Tilahun Azagegn,&nbsp;Bekele Abebe,&nbsp;Alper Baba","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11999-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study quantifies groundwater recharge in the southern sections of the western Afar Rift margin and associated rift floor by employing multiple methods, including Water balance, Chloride Mass Balance, WetSpass modeling, and Baseflow separation controlled by radon measurement. The mean annual groundwater recharge rates obtained from the first two methods are 114.39 mm/year, and 92.37 mm/year respectively. The spatially distributed recharge determined from the WetSpass model shows the rift margin has higher values than the rift floor, and results in a mean recharge of 100.88 mm/year. The baseflow separation method calculates 136.7 mm/year and 17.86 mm/year at the outlets of the marginal grabens and inside the rift floor respectively. The higher value suggests additional groundwater flows from the adjacent plateau to the rift margin, driven by the extended columnar basalt and transverse structures. In contrast, the presence of highly faulted Dalha basalt along the Arcuate Accommodation Zones (AAZ) promotes groundwater seepage, leading to lower values in the rift floor. However, from the previous hydrochemical and isotope analysis, groundwater flows from the rift margin to the rift floor, due to the presence of transverse structures create preferential pathways that connect these areas. Hence, the rift floor can have moderate recharge. Therefore, the WetSpass model and Base-flow separation methods, supported by other techniques, provide reliable results in tectonically active areas like the Afar Triangle and arid to semi-arid regions. Last but not least, the study underscores the importance of using multiple techniques for accurate assessments of recharge rates and mechanisms in similar areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating groundwater recharge through multiple methods: southern sections of the western Afar rift margin and associated rift floor\",\"authors\":\"Dereje Gidafie,&nbsp;Dessie Nedaw,&nbsp;Tilahun Azagegn,&nbsp;Bekele Abebe,&nbsp;Alper Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11999-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study quantifies groundwater recharge in the southern sections of the western Afar Rift margin and associated rift floor by employing multiple methods, including Water balance, Chloride Mass Balance, WetSpass modeling, and Baseflow separation controlled by radon measurement. The mean annual groundwater recharge rates obtained from the first two methods are 114.39 mm/year, and 92.37 mm/year respectively. The spatially distributed recharge determined from the WetSpass model shows the rift margin has higher values than the rift floor, and results in a mean recharge of 100.88 mm/year. The baseflow separation method calculates 136.7 mm/year and 17.86 mm/year at the outlets of the marginal grabens and inside the rift floor respectively. The higher value suggests additional groundwater flows from the adjacent plateau to the rift margin, driven by the extended columnar basalt and transverse structures. In contrast, the presence of highly faulted Dalha basalt along the Arcuate Accommodation Zones (AAZ) promotes groundwater seepage, leading to lower values in the rift floor. However, from the previous hydrochemical and isotope analysis, groundwater flows from the rift margin to the rift floor, due to the presence of transverse structures create preferential pathways that connect these areas. Hence, the rift floor can have moderate recharge. Therefore, the WetSpass model and Base-flow separation methods, supported by other techniques, provide reliable results in tectonically active areas like the Afar Triangle and arid to semi-arid regions. Last but not least, the study underscores the importance of using multiple techniques for accurate assessments of recharge rates and mechanisms in similar areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11999-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11999-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用水平衡、氯化物质量平衡、WetSpass模拟和氡测量控制的基流分离等多种方法,对阿法尔裂谷西缘南段及相关裂谷底板的地下水补给进行了定量分析。前两种方法得到的地下水年平均补给量分别为114.39 mm/年和92.37 mm/年。由wespass模型确定的补给量空间分布表明,裂谷边缘的补给量高于裂谷底,平均补给量为100.88 mm/年。基流分离法在边缘地堑出口和裂谷底板内部分别计算出136.7 mm/年和17.86 mm/年。较高的数值表明,在伸展柱状玄武岩和横向构造的驱动下,有额外的地下水从邻近的高原流向裂谷边缘。相反,沿弧形调节带(AAZ)的高断陷达拉玄武岩的存在促进了地下水的渗流,导致裂谷底的数值较低。然而,从之前的水化学和同位素分析来看,地下水从裂谷边缘流向裂谷底,由于横向构造的存在创造了连接这些区域的优先通道。因此,裂谷底板可以有适度的补给。因此,在其他技术的支持下,在阿法尔三角等构造活动区和干旱至半干旱区,WetSpass模型和基流分离方法提供了可靠的结果。最后但并非最不重要的是,该研究强调了使用多种技术来准确评估类似地区的补给率和机制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating groundwater recharge through multiple methods: southern sections of the western Afar rift margin and associated rift floor

This study quantifies groundwater recharge in the southern sections of the western Afar Rift margin and associated rift floor by employing multiple methods, including Water balance, Chloride Mass Balance, WetSpass modeling, and Baseflow separation controlled by radon measurement. The mean annual groundwater recharge rates obtained from the first two methods are 114.39 mm/year, and 92.37 mm/year respectively. The spatially distributed recharge determined from the WetSpass model shows the rift margin has higher values than the rift floor, and results in a mean recharge of 100.88 mm/year. The baseflow separation method calculates 136.7 mm/year and 17.86 mm/year at the outlets of the marginal grabens and inside the rift floor respectively. The higher value suggests additional groundwater flows from the adjacent plateau to the rift margin, driven by the extended columnar basalt and transverse structures. In contrast, the presence of highly faulted Dalha basalt along the Arcuate Accommodation Zones (AAZ) promotes groundwater seepage, leading to lower values in the rift floor. However, from the previous hydrochemical and isotope analysis, groundwater flows from the rift margin to the rift floor, due to the presence of transverse structures create preferential pathways that connect these areas. Hence, the rift floor can have moderate recharge. Therefore, the WetSpass model and Base-flow separation methods, supported by other techniques, provide reliable results in tectonically active areas like the Afar Triangle and arid to semi-arid regions. Last but not least, the study underscores the importance of using multiple techniques for accurate assessments of recharge rates and mechanisms in similar areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信