用机器学习方法研究光滑和微翅片管内流动沸腾的传热和压力损失

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Şükrü Sezer, Cihan Sezer, Ali Celen, Aykut Bacak, Ahmet Selim Dalkılıç
{"title":"用机器学习方法研究光滑和微翅片管内流动沸腾的传热和压力损失","authors":"Şükrü Sezer,&nbsp;Cihan Sezer,&nbsp;Ali Celen,&nbsp;Aykut Bacak,&nbsp;Ahmet Selim Dalkılıç","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13794-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of heat transfer coefficients (HTC) and pressure drop (ΔP) in flow boiling processes is essential for the effective design and operation of refrigeration systems. In this study, the artificial neural network (ANN), locally weighted regression (LWR), and gradient boosted machine (GBM) methods are employed to predict the boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and pressure drop (<span>\\(\\Delta P\\)</span>) in flow boiling of R134a. The study focuses on horizontally positioned both straight and microfin tubes. The ANN, LWR, and GBM methodologies are utilized to ascertain the parameters of boiling HTC and ΔP as outputs. These parameters are determined by considering the mass flux, saturation pressure, heat flux, vapor quality, Reynolds number, Lockhart–Martinelli parameter, Froud number, Weber number, and Bond number as inputs. The training dataset is partitioned into 5 sections for the purpose of hyperparameter tweaking for each model. Out of these sections, 4 parts, consisting of approximately 111 samples, are utilized for training, while 1 part, including around 27 samples, is allocated for validation. The optimal hyperparameters are determined by calculating the average R<sup>2</sup> score over the 5 validation sets. Using raw measurements, HTC and ΔP are successfully modeled using a relatively much smaller dataset of 174 measurements, with 82.4% R<sup>2</sup> score and 0.7% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 88.9% R<sup>2</sup> score and 4.1% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP across multiple tube types, achieved by LWR algorithm. Model performances are validated with an extrapolation test and found to be consistent with traditional train–validation–test sampling scheme with 75.9% R<sup>2</sup> score and −6.2% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 89.3% R<sup>2</sup> score and −3.9% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP, showing the consistency of the hypotheses created by a hybrid of parametric and nonparametric model families even outside the observed measurement range for multiple tube types. Local weighted regression models are the most performant, especially for limited data availability. However, calculated measurements increase error rates, suggesting that HTC and ΔP models work best with raw measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"149 24","pages":"15121 - 15141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation on the heat transfer and pressure loss of flow boiling in smooth and microfin tubes using machine learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Şükrü Sezer,&nbsp;Cihan Sezer,&nbsp;Ali Celen,&nbsp;Aykut Bacak,&nbsp;Ahmet Selim Dalkılıç\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10973-024-13794-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The estimation of heat transfer coefficients (HTC) and pressure drop (ΔP) in flow boiling processes is essential for the effective design and operation of refrigeration systems. In this study, the artificial neural network (ANN), locally weighted regression (LWR), and gradient boosted machine (GBM) methods are employed to predict the boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and pressure drop (<span>\\\\(\\\\Delta P\\\\)</span>) in flow boiling of R134a. The study focuses on horizontally positioned both straight and microfin tubes. The ANN, LWR, and GBM methodologies are utilized to ascertain the parameters of boiling HTC and ΔP as outputs. These parameters are determined by considering the mass flux, saturation pressure, heat flux, vapor quality, Reynolds number, Lockhart–Martinelli parameter, Froud number, Weber number, and Bond number as inputs. The training dataset is partitioned into 5 sections for the purpose of hyperparameter tweaking for each model. Out of these sections, 4 parts, consisting of approximately 111 samples, are utilized for training, while 1 part, including around 27 samples, is allocated for validation. The optimal hyperparameters are determined by calculating the average R<sup>2</sup> score over the 5 validation sets. Using raw measurements, HTC and ΔP are successfully modeled using a relatively much smaller dataset of 174 measurements, with 82.4% R<sup>2</sup> score and 0.7% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 88.9% R<sup>2</sup> score and 4.1% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP across multiple tube types, achieved by LWR algorithm. Model performances are validated with an extrapolation test and found to be consistent with traditional train–validation–test sampling scheme with 75.9% R<sup>2</sup> score and −6.2% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 89.3% R<sup>2</sup> score and −3.9% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP, showing the consistency of the hypotheses created by a hybrid of parametric and nonparametric model families even outside the observed measurement range for multiple tube types. Local weighted regression models are the most performant, especially for limited data availability. However, calculated measurements increase error rates, suggesting that HTC and ΔP models work best with raw measurements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"volume\":\"149 24\",\"pages\":\"15121 - 15141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13794-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13794-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流动沸腾过程中传热系数(HTC)和压降(ΔP)的估算对于制冷系统的有效设计和运行至关重要。本研究采用人工神经网络(ANN)、局部加权回归(LWR)和梯度提升机(GBM)方法对R134a流动沸腾过程中的沸腾传热系数(HTC)和压降(\(\Delta P\))进行预测。该研究的重点是水平定位的直鳍管和微鳍管。利用人工神经网络、LWR和GBM方法确定沸腾HTC和ΔP作为输出的参数。这些参数是通过考虑质量通量、饱和压力、热通量、蒸汽质量、雷诺数、Lockhart-Martinelli参数、Froud数、Weber数和Bond数作为输入来确定的。训练数据集被划分为5个部分,目的是对每个模型进行超参数调整。其中4个部分约111个样本用于训练,1个部分约27个样本用于验证。通过计算5个验证集上的平均R2分数来确定最优超参数。使用原始测量,HTC和ΔP使用相对较小的174个测量数据集成功建模,其中82.4个% R2 score and 0.7% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 88.9% R2 score and 4.1% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP across multiple tube types, achieved by LWR algorithm. Model performances are validated with an extrapolation test and found to be consistent with traditional train–validation–test sampling scheme with 75.9% R2 score and −6.2% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 89.3% R2 score and −3.9% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP, showing the consistency of the hypotheses created by a hybrid of parametric and nonparametric model families even outside the observed measurement range for multiple tube types. Local weighted regression models are the most performant, especially for limited data availability. However, calculated measurements increase error rates, suggesting that HTC and ΔP models work best with raw measurements.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation on the heat transfer and pressure loss of flow boiling in smooth and microfin tubes using machine learning methods

The estimation of heat transfer coefficients (HTC) and pressure drop (ΔP) in flow boiling processes is essential for the effective design and operation of refrigeration systems. In this study, the artificial neural network (ANN), locally weighted regression (LWR), and gradient boosted machine (GBM) methods are employed to predict the boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and pressure drop (\(\Delta P\)) in flow boiling of R134a. The study focuses on horizontally positioned both straight and microfin tubes. The ANN, LWR, and GBM methodologies are utilized to ascertain the parameters of boiling HTC and ΔP as outputs. These parameters are determined by considering the mass flux, saturation pressure, heat flux, vapor quality, Reynolds number, Lockhart–Martinelli parameter, Froud number, Weber number, and Bond number as inputs. The training dataset is partitioned into 5 sections for the purpose of hyperparameter tweaking for each model. Out of these sections, 4 parts, consisting of approximately 111 samples, are utilized for training, while 1 part, including around 27 samples, is allocated for validation. The optimal hyperparameters are determined by calculating the average R2 score over the 5 validation sets. Using raw measurements, HTC and ΔP are successfully modeled using a relatively much smaller dataset of 174 measurements, with 82.4% R2 score and 0.7% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 88.9% R2 score and 4.1% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP across multiple tube types, achieved by LWR algorithm. Model performances are validated with an extrapolation test and found to be consistent with traditional train–validation–test sampling scheme with 75.9% R2 score and −6.2% weighted average relative deviation for HTC, and 89.3% R2 score and −3.9% weighted average relative deviation for ΔP, showing the consistency of the hypotheses created by a hybrid of parametric and nonparametric model families even outside the observed measurement range for multiple tube types. Local weighted regression models are the most performant, especially for limited data availability. However, calculated measurements increase error rates, suggesting that HTC and ΔP models work best with raw measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信