可再生能源不稳定条件下碱性和质子交换膜电解制氢的技术经济比较评价

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Joungho Park, Sungho Kang, Sunwoo Kim, Hana Kim, Hyun-Seok Cho, Jay H. Lee
{"title":"可再生能源不稳定条件下碱性和质子交换膜电解制氢的技术经济比较评价","authors":"Joungho Park, Sungho Kang, Sunwoo Kim, Hana Kim, Hyun-Seok Cho, Jay H. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the economic feasibility of two leading electrolysis technologies—alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane electrolysis—in the context of rapid temporal fluctuations from renewable energy sources. Alkaline electrolysis currently benefits from its relative maturity and established economic advantages. On the other hand, proton exchange membrane electrolysis offers enhanced operational flexibility and substantial potential for technological advancements that could significantly improve its economic viability and efficiency over the long term. Comprehensive process models of various system components are developed to evaluate the impact of minimum load requirements on these systems and explore strategies to mitigate these effects. Initially more economically viable, alkaline electrolysis could see its advantage shift with the strategic integration of batteries to reduce on/off operations and the implementation of overload operations, compared to proton exchange membrane electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis confirms the future competitiveness of these technologies, considering anticipated technological improvements, the influence of key economic variables, multi-year variability in weather patterns, and the impacts of maintenance requirements and system downtime associated with frequent on/off cycles.","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative techno-economic evaluation of alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolysis for hydrogen production amidst renewable energy source volatility\",\"authors\":\"Joungho Park, Sungho Kang, Sunwoo Kim, Hana Kim, Hyun-Seok Cho, Jay H. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the economic feasibility of two leading electrolysis technologies—alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane electrolysis—in the context of rapid temporal fluctuations from renewable energy sources. Alkaline electrolysis currently benefits from its relative maturity and established economic advantages. On the other hand, proton exchange membrane electrolysis offers enhanced operational flexibility and substantial potential for technological advancements that could significantly improve its economic viability and efficiency over the long term. Comprehensive process models of various system components are developed to evaluate the impact of minimum load requirements on these systems and explore strategies to mitigate these effects. Initially more economically viable, alkaline electrolysis could see its advantage shift with the strategic integration of batteries to reduce on/off operations and the implementation of overload operations, compared to proton exchange membrane electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis confirms the future competitiveness of these technologies, considering anticipated technological improvements, the influence of key economic variables, multi-year variability in weather patterns, and the impacts of maintenance requirements and system downtime associated with frequent on/off cycles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了两种领先的电解技术——碱性电解和质子交换膜电解——在可再生能源快速波动的背景下的经济可行性。碱电解目前得益于其相对成熟和已确立的经济优势。另一方面,质子交换膜电解提供了更高的操作灵活性和巨大的技术进步潜力,可以显著提高其长期的经济可行性和效率。开发了各种系统组件的综合过程模型,以评估最小负载要求对这些系统的影响,并探索减轻这些影响的策略。与质子交换膜电解相比,碱性电解最初更具经济可行性,但随着电池的战略性整合,以减少开/关操作和过载操作的实施,其优势将发生转变。考虑到预期的技术改进、关键经济变量的影响、天气模式的多年变化、维护需求的影响以及与频繁开/关周期相关的系统停机时间,敏感性分析证实了这些技术的未来竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative techno-economic evaluation of alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolysis for hydrogen production amidst renewable energy source volatility
This study explores the economic feasibility of two leading electrolysis technologies—alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane electrolysis—in the context of rapid temporal fluctuations from renewable energy sources. Alkaline electrolysis currently benefits from its relative maturity and established economic advantages. On the other hand, proton exchange membrane electrolysis offers enhanced operational flexibility and substantial potential for technological advancements that could significantly improve its economic viability and efficiency over the long term. Comprehensive process models of various system components are developed to evaluate the impact of minimum load requirements on these systems and explore strategies to mitigate these effects. Initially more economically viable, alkaline electrolysis could see its advantage shift with the strategic integration of batteries to reduce on/off operations and the implementation of overload operations, compared to proton exchange membrane electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis confirms the future competitiveness of these technologies, considering anticipated technological improvements, the influence of key economic variables, multi-year variability in weather patterns, and the impacts of maintenance requirements and system downtime associated with frequent on/off cycles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信