停止规则和贝叶斯确认理论

IF 1.5 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Yunbing Li, Yongfeng Yuan
{"title":"停止规则和贝叶斯确认理论","authors":"Yunbing Li, Yongfeng Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article mainly investigates whether common Bayesian confirmation measures are affected by stopping rules. The results indicate that difference measure <i>d</i>, log-ratio measure <i>r</i>, and log-likelihood measure <i>l</i> are not affected by non-informative stopping rules, but affected by informative stopping rules. In contrast, Carnap measure <span>\\(\\tau \\)</span>, normalized difference measure <i>n</i>, and Mortimer measure <i>m</i> are affected by (non-)informative stopping rules sometimes but sometimes aren’t. Besides, we use two examples to further illustrate that confirmation measures <i>d</i>, <i>r</i>, and <i>l</i> are better than <span>\\(\\tau ,n\\)</span>, and <i>m</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stopping rule and Bayesian confirmation theory\",\"authors\":\"Yunbing Li, Yongfeng Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article mainly investigates whether common Bayesian confirmation measures are affected by stopping rules. The results indicate that difference measure <i>d</i>, log-ratio measure <i>r</i>, and log-likelihood measure <i>l</i> are not affected by non-informative stopping rules, but affected by informative stopping rules. In contrast, Carnap measure <span>\\\\(\\\\tau \\\\)</span>, normalized difference measure <i>n</i>, and Mortimer measure <i>m</i> are affected by (non-)informative stopping rules sometimes but sometimes aren’t. Besides, we use two examples to further illustrate that confirmation measures <i>d</i>, <i>r</i>, and <i>l</i> are better than <span>\\\\(\\\\tau ,n\\\\)</span>, and <i>m</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要研究一般的贝叶斯确认措施是否受到停止规则的影响。结果表明,差异测度d、对数比测度r和对数似然测度l不受非信息性停止规则的影响,而受信息性停止规则的影响。相比之下,Carnap测度\(\tau \)、归一化差分测度n和Mortimer测度m有时受到(非)信息性停止规则的影响,有时不受影响。此外,我们用两个例子进一步说明确认测度d、r和l优于\(\tau ,n\)和m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stopping rule and Bayesian confirmation theory

This article mainly investigates whether common Bayesian confirmation measures are affected by stopping rules. The results indicate that difference measure d, log-ratio measure r, and log-likelihood measure l are not affected by non-informative stopping rules, but affected by informative stopping rules. In contrast, Carnap measure \(\tau \), normalized difference measure n, and Mortimer measure m are affected by (non-)informative stopping rules sometimes but sometimes aren’t. Besides, we use two examples to further illustrate that confirmation measures d, r, and l are better than \(\tau ,n\), and m.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
European Journal for Philosophy of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信