角膜屈光手术后术中像差测量与Barrett True-K公式的屈光预测准确性。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S487888
Nicole R Fram, John Davidson, Xiaolin Gu, Raiju J Babu, Michael Breen
{"title":"角膜屈光手术后术中像差测量与Barrett True-K公式的屈光预测准确性。","authors":"Nicole R Fram, John Davidson, Xiaolin Gu, Raiju J Babu, Michael Breen","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S487888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye). All Eyes were subgrouped by axial length (AL) and further analyzed. The main outcomes included paired differences in absolute prediction errors (APEs) between the ORA SYSTEM and BTK and differences in the proportion of eyes with APEs of ≤0.25 diopter (D) and ≤0.50 D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1067 eyes were analyzed, including 897 First Surgery Eyes. Significantly higher proportions of All Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0128) and ≤0.50 D (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. Similarly, significantly higher proportions of First Surgery Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0037) and ≤0.50 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0004) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. In both datasets, mean (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and median (<i>P</i> ≤0.0005) APEs were significantly lower with the ORA SYSTEM than with the BTK formula. AL did not affect the differences in prediction accuracy between these IOL power calculations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In post-myopic PRK or LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery, the ORA SYSTEM provided significantly more accurate refractive predictability than the BTK formula, as determined by mean and median APE.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3871-3879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive Prediction Accuracy Using Intraoperative Aberrometry versus Barrett True-K Formula Following Corneal Refractive Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole R Fram, John Davidson, Xiaolin Gu, Raiju J Babu, Michael Breen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S487888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye). All Eyes were subgrouped by axial length (AL) and further analyzed. The main outcomes included paired differences in absolute prediction errors (APEs) between the ORA SYSTEM and BTK and differences in the proportion of eyes with APEs of ≤0.25 diopter (D) and ≤0.50 D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1067 eyes were analyzed, including 897 First Surgery Eyes. Significantly higher proportions of All Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0128) and ≤0.50 D (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. Similarly, significantly higher proportions of First Surgery Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0037) and ≤0.50 D (<i>P</i> = 0.0004) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. In both datasets, mean (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and median (<i>P</i> ≤0.0005) APEs were significantly lower with the ORA SYSTEM than with the BTK formula. AL did not affect the differences in prediction accuracy between these IOL power calculations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In post-myopic PRK or LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery, the ORA SYSTEM provided significantly more accurate refractive predictability than the BTK formula, as determined by mean and median APE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3871-3879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S487888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S487888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较Optiwave屈光分析(ORA)系统与Barrett True-K (BTK)公式在计算近视屈光性角膜切除术(PRK)或激光辅助原位角膜磨除术(LASIK)后白内障手术患者人工晶状体(IOL)度数的准确性。方法:本回顾性研究评估了年龄≥22岁,既往患有近视PRK或LASIK的患者,他们在美国177个地点使用ORA SYSTEM进行单侧或双侧白内障摘除和单焦点人工晶状体植入术。分析了两个数据集:All Eyes(即所有符合条件的眼睛)和First Surgery Eyes(即每位患者的第一只植入的眼睛)。所有眼按眼轴长度(AL)分组并进一步分析。主要结果包括ORA SYSTEM和BTK的绝对预测误差(ape)的配对差异,以及ape≤0.25屈光度(D)和≤0.50 D的眼睛比例的差异。结果:共分析1067只眼睛,其中897只为首次手术眼。与BTK相比,ORA系统的全眼鼠类人猿≤0.25 D (P = 0.0128)、≤0.50 D (P = 0.0037)和≤0.50 D (P = 0.0004)的比例显著高于BTK。在两个数据集中,使用ORA SYSTEM的平均(P≤0.0005)猿类显著低于使用BTK公式的猿类。人工智能不影响人工晶状体度数计算预测精度的差异。结论:在接受白内障手术的近视后PRK或LASIK眼中,通过平均和中位数APE确定,ORA SYSTEM提供比BTK公式更准确的屈光预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refractive Prediction Accuracy Using Intraoperative Aberrometry versus Barrett True-K Formula Following Corneal Refractive Surgery.

Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye). All Eyes were subgrouped by axial length (AL) and further analyzed. The main outcomes included paired differences in absolute prediction errors (APEs) between the ORA SYSTEM and BTK and differences in the proportion of eyes with APEs of ≤0.25 diopter (D) and ≤0.50 D.

Results: 1067 eyes were analyzed, including 897 First Surgery Eyes. Significantly higher proportions of All Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (P = 0.0128) and ≤0.50 D (P < 0.0001) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. Similarly, significantly higher proportions of First Surgery Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D (P = 0.0037) and ≤0.50 D (P = 0.0004) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. In both datasets, mean (P < 0.0001) and median (P ≤0.0005) APEs were significantly lower with the ORA SYSTEM than with the BTK formula. AL did not affect the differences in prediction accuracy between these IOL power calculations.

Conclusion: In post-myopic PRK or LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery, the ORA SYSTEM provided significantly more accurate refractive predictability than the BTK formula, as determined by mean and median APE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信