{"title":"糖尿病及宫颈病变对剖宫产术后瘢痕愈合的影响。","authors":"Şükran Doğru, Huriye Ezveci, Fatih Akkuş, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Elifsena Canan Alp, Kazim Gezginç","doi":"10.15557/jou.2024.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diabetes mellitus and cervical dilatation on cesarean section scar healing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study included pregnant women diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and healthy control pregnant women. The study group was divided into active labor and pre-active labor based on cervical dilatation, and the diabetic group was categorized into gestational diabetes and preexisting diabetes mellitus. Vaginal ultrasound was performed in the entire study group at six months postpartum, and the location of the cesarean scar was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 170 participants in the study; 85 were diabetic, and the remaining 85 were healthy controls. Niche frequency in diabetes mellitus cases was not different from that in healthy controls (<i>p</i> = 0.420). The mean residual myometrial thickness, proximal residual myometrial thickness, and distal residual myometrial thickness were lower in the diabetic group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Residual myometrial thickness and niche presence in the diabetic group with active labor was not statistically different from the diabetic group without active labor (<i>p</i> >0.05). Additionally, residual myometrial thickness was thinner in the gestational diabetes mellitus group than in the preexisting diabetes mellitus group (3.61 ± 1.78 mm vs. 4.76 ± 2.82 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in niche frequency between diabetic cases and healthy controls. When comparing the gestational diabetes mellitus group and the preexisting diabetes mellitus groups, there was no difference in the presence of niches. Niche presence was more common in diet-regulated diabetic patients compared with the insulin-regulated group. Cervical dilatation at the time of cesarean section did not affect niche presence in diabetic cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":"24 99","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of diabetes mellitus and cervical changes on scar healing after cesarean section.\",\"authors\":\"Şükran Doğru, Huriye Ezveci, Fatih Akkuş, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Elifsena Canan Alp, Kazim Gezginç\",\"doi\":\"10.15557/jou.2024.0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diabetes mellitus and cervical dilatation on cesarean section scar healing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study included pregnant women diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and healthy control pregnant women. The study group was divided into active labor and pre-active labor based on cervical dilatation, and the diabetic group was categorized into gestational diabetes and preexisting diabetes mellitus. Vaginal ultrasound was performed in the entire study group at six months postpartum, and the location of the cesarean scar was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 170 participants in the study; 85 were diabetic, and the remaining 85 were healthy controls. Niche frequency in diabetes mellitus cases was not different from that in healthy controls (<i>p</i> = 0.420). The mean residual myometrial thickness, proximal residual myometrial thickness, and distal residual myometrial thickness were lower in the diabetic group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Residual myometrial thickness and niche presence in the diabetic group with active labor was not statistically different from the diabetic group without active labor (<i>p</i> >0.05). Additionally, residual myometrial thickness was thinner in the gestational diabetes mellitus group than in the preexisting diabetes mellitus group (3.61 ± 1.78 mm vs. 4.76 ± 2.82 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in niche frequency between diabetic cases and healthy controls. When comparing the gestational diabetes mellitus group and the preexisting diabetes mellitus groups, there was no difference in the presence of niches. Niche presence was more common in diet-regulated diabetic patients compared with the insulin-regulated group. Cervical dilatation at the time of cesarean section did not affect niche presence in diabetic cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\"24 99\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2024.0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2024.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨糖尿病和宫颈扩张对剖宫产术后瘢痕愈合的影响。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究包括诊断为糖尿病的孕妇和健康对照孕妇。研究组根据宫颈扩张情况分为产程和产程前,糖尿病组分为妊娠期糖尿病组和既往糖尿病组。整个研究组在产后6个月进行阴道超声检查,评估剖宫产瘢痕的位置。结果:共纳入研究对象170人;85人为糖尿病患者,其余85人为健康对照组。糖尿病患者与健康对照组的生态位频率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.420)。糖尿病组的平均残余肌层厚度、近端残余肌层厚度和远端残余肌层厚度较低(p = 0.001)。产程积极的糖尿病组与未产程积极的糖尿病组的残余肌层厚度和生态位存在性无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。此外,妊娠期糖尿病组的残余肌层厚度较既往糖尿病组薄(3.61±1.78 mm比4.76±2.82 mm, p = 0.032)。结论:糖尿病患者与健康对照组的生态位频率无显著差异。当比较妊娠期糖尿病组和既往糖尿病组时,壁龛的存在没有差异。与胰岛素调节组相比,生态位在饮食调节组的糖尿病患者中更常见。剖宫产时宫颈扩张不影响糖尿病病例的生态位存在。
Effects of diabetes mellitus and cervical changes on scar healing after cesarean section.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diabetes mellitus and cervical dilatation on cesarean section scar healing.
Material and methods: This prospective study included pregnant women diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and healthy control pregnant women. The study group was divided into active labor and pre-active labor based on cervical dilatation, and the diabetic group was categorized into gestational diabetes and preexisting diabetes mellitus. Vaginal ultrasound was performed in the entire study group at six months postpartum, and the location of the cesarean scar was evaluated.
Results: There were 170 participants in the study; 85 were diabetic, and the remaining 85 were healthy controls. Niche frequency in diabetes mellitus cases was not different from that in healthy controls (p = 0.420). The mean residual myometrial thickness, proximal residual myometrial thickness, and distal residual myometrial thickness were lower in the diabetic group (p = 0.001). Residual myometrial thickness and niche presence in the diabetic group with active labor was not statistically different from the diabetic group without active labor (p >0.05). Additionally, residual myometrial thickness was thinner in the gestational diabetes mellitus group than in the preexisting diabetes mellitus group (3.61 ± 1.78 mm vs. 4.76 ± 2.82 mm, p = 0.032).
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in niche frequency between diabetic cases and healthy controls. When comparing the gestational diabetes mellitus group and the preexisting diabetes mellitus groups, there was no difference in the presence of niches. Niche presence was more common in diet-regulated diabetic patients compared with the insulin-regulated group. Cervical dilatation at the time of cesarean section did not affect niche presence in diabetic cases.