患者支持和健康教育对糖尿病管理和血糖控制的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Meshari Nawar Alotaibi, Aminah Saeed Almutairi, Fahad Abdulmajeed Alkhayal, Sulaiman Mohammed Alqahtani, Fatimah Nasser Alshehri, Mostafa Kofi
{"title":"患者支持和健康教育对糖尿病管理和血糖控制的影响。","authors":"Meshari Nawar Alotaibi, Aminah Saeed Almutairi, Fahad Abdulmajeed Alkhayal, Sulaiman Mohammed Alqahtani, Fatimah Nasser Alshehri, Mostafa Kofi","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic and complex medical condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Maintaining an adequate blood glucose level is important for patients with diabetes, and to improve glycemic control, patients need proper support and health education, which are essential components of comprehensive diabetes care. We used a rigorous approach based on the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook principles, specifically focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from 2005 onwards. The statistical analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous data, whereas mean differences were calculated for continuous data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated. From an initial pool of 544 records, 368 studies were examined after eliminating duplicates. Ultimately, 24 studies were deemed suitable based on the inclusion criteria. These studies involved 2437 participants in the intervention group and 2305 people in the control group. The quality assessment indicated that 41.7% of the studies were categorized as low risk, 16.7% as high risk, and 41.7% had certain concerns regarding bias. The analyses revealed noteworthy decreases in HbA1c levels in the intervention group at several time points, particularly showing improvements after 3 months. Egger's regression indicated the presence of possible publication bias. The results emphasize the crucial impact of health education and mentorship interventions on enhancing glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Interventions focused on empowering patients proved to be especially effective in enhancing diabetes management outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 10","pages":"908-917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of patient support and health education on diabetes management and glycemic control.\",\"authors\":\"Meshari Nawar Alotaibi, Aminah Saeed Almutairi, Fahad Abdulmajeed Alkhayal, Sulaiman Mohammed Alqahtani, Fatimah Nasser Alshehri, Mostafa Kofi\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2024-0290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic and complex medical condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Maintaining an adequate blood glucose level is important for patients with diabetes, and to improve glycemic control, patients need proper support and health education, which are essential components of comprehensive diabetes care. We used a rigorous approach based on the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook principles, specifically focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from 2005 onwards. The statistical analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous data, whereas mean differences were calculated for continuous data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated. From an initial pool of 544 records, 368 studies were examined after eliminating duplicates. Ultimately, 24 studies were deemed suitable based on the inclusion criteria. These studies involved 2437 participants in the intervention group and 2305 people in the control group. The quality assessment indicated that 41.7% of the studies were categorized as low risk, 16.7% as high risk, and 41.7% had certain concerns regarding bias. The analyses revealed noteworthy decreases in HbA1c levels in the intervention group at several time points, particularly showing improvements after 3 months. Egger's regression indicated the presence of possible publication bias. The results emphasize the crucial impact of health education and mentorship interventions on enhancing glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Interventions focused on empowering patients proved to be especially effective in enhancing diabetes management outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"908-917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665752/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病是一种慢性和复杂的疾病,可导致显著的发病率和死亡率。维持适当的血糖水平对糖尿病患者很重要,为了改善血糖控制,患者需要适当的支持和健康教育,这是糖尿病综合护理的重要组成部分。我们采用了基于PRISMA和Cochrane手册原则的严格方法,特别关注2005年以来以英文发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用RevMan软件进行统计分析。对二分类数据计算合并风险比,对连续数据计算平均差异。异质性和发表偏倚也进行了评估。从最初的544项记录中,剔除重复项后检查了368项研究。最终,根据纳入标准,24项研究被认为是合适的。这些研究涉及干预组2437名参与者和对照组2305名参与者。质量评价显示41.7%的研究为低风险,16.7%为高风险,41.7%存在一定的偏倚问题。分析显示,干预组在几个时间点的HbA1c水平显著下降,特别是在3个月后有所改善。Egger的回归表明可能存在发表偏倚。结果强调了健康教育和指导干预对改善2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的重要影响。注重增强患者权能的干预措施已被证明在提高糖尿病管理结果方面特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of patient support and health education on diabetes management and glycemic control.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic and complex medical condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Maintaining an adequate blood glucose level is important for patients with diabetes, and to improve glycemic control, patients need proper support and health education, which are essential components of comprehensive diabetes care. We used a rigorous approach based on the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook principles, specifically focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from 2005 onwards. The statistical analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous data, whereas mean differences were calculated for continuous data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated. From an initial pool of 544 records, 368 studies were examined after eliminating duplicates. Ultimately, 24 studies were deemed suitable based on the inclusion criteria. These studies involved 2437 participants in the intervention group and 2305 people in the control group. The quality assessment indicated that 41.7% of the studies were categorized as low risk, 16.7% as high risk, and 41.7% had certain concerns regarding bias. The analyses revealed noteworthy decreases in HbA1c levels in the intervention group at several time points, particularly showing improvements after 3 months. Egger's regression indicated the presence of possible publication bias. The results emphasize the crucial impact of health education and mentorship interventions on enhancing glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Interventions focused on empowering patients proved to be especially effective in enhancing diabetes management outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信