基于焦虑倾向的功能连接差异研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612
Misuzu Oishi, Noriko Sakurai, Yuki Kawasaki, Kei Sasaki, Satoshi Kasai, Naoki Kodama
{"title":"基于焦虑倾向的功能连接差异研究。","authors":"Misuzu Oishi, Noriko Sakurai, Yuki Kawasaki, Kei Sasaki, Satoshi Kasai, Naoki Kodama","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anxiety is an emotion necessary for human survival. However, persistent and excessive anxiety can be clinically challenging. Increased anxiety affects daily life and requires early detection and intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the neural basis of mild anxiety is needed. However, previous studies have focused primarily on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in patients with psychiatric disorders presenting with anxiety. Notably, only a few studies have been conducted on healthy participants, and the relationship between anxiety and functional brain connectivity in the healthy range remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the differences in functional brain connectivity at different degrees of anxiety among healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 48 healthy participants with no history of psychiatric disorders. Participants were administered The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 60, a psychological test for assessing anxiety, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS). The participants then underwent rs-fMRI. Based on the results of each psychological test, the participants were classified into normal and anxiety groups, and the functional connectivity between the two groups was compared using a seed-to-voxel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of functional brain connectivity between the normal and anxiety groups classified based on the GHQ60 and MAS revealed differences between brain regions comprising the salience network (SN) in both psychological tests. For the GHQ60, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and insular cortex compared with the normal group. However, for the MAS, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal and anterior cingulate cortical gyri compared with the normal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional connectivity within the SN was reduced in the group with higher anxiety when functional brain connectivity at different anxiety levels was examined in healthy participants. This suggests that anxiety is involved in changes in the functional brain connectivity associated with emotional processing and cognitive control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1498612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of functional connectivity differences based on anxiety tendencies.\",\"authors\":\"Misuzu Oishi, Noriko Sakurai, Yuki Kawasaki, Kei Sasaki, Satoshi Kasai, Naoki Kodama\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anxiety is an emotion necessary for human survival. However, persistent and excessive anxiety can be clinically challenging. Increased anxiety affects daily life and requires early detection and intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the neural basis of mild anxiety is needed. However, previous studies have focused primarily on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in patients with psychiatric disorders presenting with anxiety. Notably, only a few studies have been conducted on healthy participants, and the relationship between anxiety and functional brain connectivity in the healthy range remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the differences in functional brain connectivity at different degrees of anxiety among healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 48 healthy participants with no history of psychiatric disorders. Participants were administered The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 60, a psychological test for assessing anxiety, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS). The participants then underwent rs-fMRI. Based on the results of each psychological test, the participants were classified into normal and anxiety groups, and the functional connectivity between the two groups was compared using a seed-to-voxel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of functional brain connectivity between the normal and anxiety groups classified based on the GHQ60 and MAS revealed differences between brain regions comprising the salience network (SN) in both psychological tests. For the GHQ60, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and insular cortex compared with the normal group. However, for the MAS, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal and anterior cingulate cortical gyri compared with the normal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional connectivity within the SN was reduced in the group with higher anxiety when functional brain connectivity at different anxiety levels was examined in healthy participants. This suggests that anxiety is involved in changes in the functional brain connectivity associated with emotional processing and cognitive control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1498612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑是人类生存所必需的一种情绪。然而,持续和过度的焦虑在临床上是具有挑战性的。焦虑加剧影响日常生活,需要及早发现和干预。因此,需要更好地了解轻度焦虑的神经基础。然而,先前的研究主要集中在以焦虑为表现的精神障碍患者的静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)。值得注意的是,只有少数研究是针对健康参与者进行的,在健康范围内,焦虑与大脑功能连接之间的关系尚不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在阐明健康参与者在不同焦虑程度下脑功能连通性的差异。方法:本研究纳入48名无精神疾病史的健康受试者。参与者接受了一般健康问卷(GHQ) 60,一种评估焦虑的心理测试,以及表现焦虑量表(MAS)。然后,参与者接受了核磁共振成像。根据每个心理测试的结果,参与者被分为正常组和焦虑组,并使用种子-体素分析比较两组之间的功能连通性。结果:比较基于GHQ60和MAS分类的正常组和焦虑组之间的脑功能连通性,揭示了两种心理测试中组成显着网络(SN)的脑区域之间的差异。对于GHQ60,与正常组相比,焦虑组显示右侧边缘上回和岛叶皮层之间的连通性降低。然而,对于MAS,与正常组相比,焦虑组显示右侧边缘上和前扣带皮质回之间的连通性降低。结论:在对健康受试者进行不同焦虑水平的脑功能连通性检查时,高焦虑组SN内功能连通性降低。这表明,焦虑与与情绪处理和认知控制相关的功能性大脑连接的变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of functional connectivity differences based on anxiety tendencies.

Introduction: Anxiety is an emotion necessary for human survival. However, persistent and excessive anxiety can be clinically challenging. Increased anxiety affects daily life and requires early detection and intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the neural basis of mild anxiety is needed. However, previous studies have focused primarily on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in patients with psychiatric disorders presenting with anxiety. Notably, only a few studies have been conducted on healthy participants, and the relationship between anxiety and functional brain connectivity in the healthy range remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the differences in functional brain connectivity at different degrees of anxiety among healthy participants.

Methods: This study included 48 healthy participants with no history of psychiatric disorders. Participants were administered The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 60, a psychological test for assessing anxiety, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS). The participants then underwent rs-fMRI. Based on the results of each psychological test, the participants were classified into normal and anxiety groups, and the functional connectivity between the two groups was compared using a seed-to-voxel analysis.

Results: Comparison of functional brain connectivity between the normal and anxiety groups classified based on the GHQ60 and MAS revealed differences between brain regions comprising the salience network (SN) in both psychological tests. For the GHQ60, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and insular cortex compared with the normal group. However, for the MAS, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal and anterior cingulate cortical gyri compared with the normal group.

Conclusion: Functional connectivity within the SN was reduced in the group with higher anxiety when functional brain connectivity at different anxiety levels was examined in healthy participants. This suggests that anxiety is involved in changes in the functional brain connectivity associated with emotional processing and cognitive control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信