使用实时相衬CSF流与皮质BOLD MRI交叉评估BOLD-CSF动力学。

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Emiel C A Roefs, Ingmar Eiling, Jeroen de Bresser, Matthias J P van Osch, Lydiane Hirschler
{"title":"使用实时相衬CSF流与皮质BOLD MRI交叉评估BOLD-CSF动力学。","authors":"Emiel C A Roefs, Ingmar Eiling, Jeroen de Bresser, Matthias J P van Osch, Lydiane Hirschler","doi":"10.1186/s12987-024-00607-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion and pulsatility has been proposed to play a crucial role in clearing brain waste. Although its driving forces remain debated, increasing evidence suggests that large amplitude vasomotion drives such CSF fluctuations. Recently, a fast blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI sequence was used to measure the coupling between CSF fluctuations and low-frequency hemodynamic oscillations in the human cortex. However, this technique is not quantitative, only captures unidirectional flow and is sensitive to B0-fluctuations. Real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) instead measures CSF flow dynamics in a fast, quantitative, bidirectional and B0-insensitive manner, but lacks information on hemodynamic brain oscillations. In this study we propose to combine the strengths of both sequences by interleaving real-time phase contrast with a cortical BOLD scan, thereby enabling the quantification of the interaction between CSF flow and cortical BOLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two experiments were performed. First, we compared the CSF flow measured using real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) with the inflow-sensitized BOLD (iCSF) measurements by interleaving both techniques at the repetition level and planning them at the same location. Next, we compared the BOLD-CSF coupling obtained using the novel pcCSF interleaved with cortical BOLD to the coupling obtained with the original iCSF. To time-lock the CSF fluctuations, participants were instructed to perform slow, abdominal paced breathing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>pcCSF captures bidirectional CSF dynamics with a more pronounced in- and outflow curve than the original iCSF method. With the pcCSF method, the BOLD-CSF coupling was stronger (mean cross-correlation peak increase = 0.22, p = .008) and with a 1.9 s shorter temporal lag (p = .016), as compared to using the original iCSF technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we introduce a new method to study the coupling of CSF flow measured in the fourth ventricle to cortical BOLD fluctuations. In contrast to the original approach, the use of phase contrast MRI to measure CSF flow provides a quantitative in- and outflow curve, and improved BOLD-CSF coupling metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12321,"journal":{"name":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","volume":"21 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOLD-CSF dynamics assessed using real-time phase contrast CSF flow interleaved with cortical BOLD MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Emiel C A Roefs, Ingmar Eiling, Jeroen de Bresser, Matthias J P van Osch, Lydiane Hirschler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12987-024-00607-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion and pulsatility has been proposed to play a crucial role in clearing brain waste. Although its driving forces remain debated, increasing evidence suggests that large amplitude vasomotion drives such CSF fluctuations. Recently, a fast blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI sequence was used to measure the coupling between CSF fluctuations and low-frequency hemodynamic oscillations in the human cortex. However, this technique is not quantitative, only captures unidirectional flow and is sensitive to B0-fluctuations. Real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) instead measures CSF flow dynamics in a fast, quantitative, bidirectional and B0-insensitive manner, but lacks information on hemodynamic brain oscillations. In this study we propose to combine the strengths of both sequences by interleaving real-time phase contrast with a cortical BOLD scan, thereby enabling the quantification of the interaction between CSF flow and cortical BOLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two experiments were performed. First, we compared the CSF flow measured using real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) with the inflow-sensitized BOLD (iCSF) measurements by interleaving both techniques at the repetition level and planning them at the same location. Next, we compared the BOLD-CSF coupling obtained using the novel pcCSF interleaved with cortical BOLD to the coupling obtained with the original iCSF. To time-lock the CSF fluctuations, participants were instructed to perform slow, abdominal paced breathing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>pcCSF captures bidirectional CSF dynamics with a more pronounced in- and outflow curve than the original iCSF method. With the pcCSF method, the BOLD-CSF coupling was stronger (mean cross-correlation peak increase = 0.22, p = .008) and with a 1.9 s shorter temporal lag (p = .016), as compared to using the original iCSF technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we introduce a new method to study the coupling of CSF flow measured in the fourth ventricle to cortical BOLD fluctuations. In contrast to the original approach, the use of phase contrast MRI to measure CSF flow provides a quantitative in- and outflow curve, and improved BOLD-CSF coupling metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669233/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00607-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00607-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑脊液(CSF)的运动和搏动在清除脑废物中起着至关重要的作用。尽管其驱动力仍有争议,但越来越多的证据表明,大振幅血管舒缩驱动这种脑脊液波动。最近,一种快速血氧水平依赖(BOLD)功能磁共振成像序列被用来测量脑脊液波动与人类皮层低频血流动力学振荡之间的耦合。然而,这种技术不是定量的,只能捕获单向流动,并且对b0波动很敏感。实时相位对比(pcCSF)以快速、定量、双向和b0不敏感的方式测量脑脊液血流动力学,但缺乏大脑血流动力学振荡的信息。在这项研究中,我们建议结合两个序列的优势,通过交替进行实时相位对比和皮质BOLD扫描,从而能够量化脑脊液流和皮质BOLD之间的相互作用。方法:进行两项实验。首先,我们将实时相衬(pcCSF)测量的脑脊液流量与流入敏化BOLD (iCSF)测量的脑脊液流量进行了比较,方法是在重复水平上交叉使用这两种技术,并将它们安排在同一位置。接下来,我们比较了使用与皮质BOLD交织的新型pcCSF获得的BOLD- csf耦合与使用原始iCSF获得的耦合。为了锁定脑脊液波动的时间,参与者被指示进行缓慢的腹式呼吸。结果:与原始的iCSF方法相比,pcCSF捕获了双向CSF动态,具有更明显的流入和流出曲线。与使用原始iCSF技术相比,使用pcCSF方法,BOLD-CSF耦合更强(平均相互关联峰增加= 0.22,p = 0.008),时间滞后缩短1.9 s (p = 0.016)。结论:在本研究中,我们引入了一种新的方法来研究第四脑室测量的脑脊液流量与皮质BOLD波动的耦合。与最初的方法相比,使用相衬MRI测量脑脊液流量提供了定量的流入和流出曲线,并改进了BOLD-CSF耦合指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BOLD-CSF dynamics assessed using real-time phase contrast CSF flow interleaved with cortical BOLD MRI.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion and pulsatility has been proposed to play a crucial role in clearing brain waste. Although its driving forces remain debated, increasing evidence suggests that large amplitude vasomotion drives such CSF fluctuations. Recently, a fast blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI sequence was used to measure the coupling between CSF fluctuations and low-frequency hemodynamic oscillations in the human cortex. However, this technique is not quantitative, only captures unidirectional flow and is sensitive to B0-fluctuations. Real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) instead measures CSF flow dynamics in a fast, quantitative, bidirectional and B0-insensitive manner, but lacks information on hemodynamic brain oscillations. In this study we propose to combine the strengths of both sequences by interleaving real-time phase contrast with a cortical BOLD scan, thereby enabling the quantification of the interaction between CSF flow and cortical BOLD.

Methods: Two experiments were performed. First, we compared the CSF flow measured using real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) with the inflow-sensitized BOLD (iCSF) measurements by interleaving both techniques at the repetition level and planning them at the same location. Next, we compared the BOLD-CSF coupling obtained using the novel pcCSF interleaved with cortical BOLD to the coupling obtained with the original iCSF. To time-lock the CSF fluctuations, participants were instructed to perform slow, abdominal paced breathing.

Results: pcCSF captures bidirectional CSF dynamics with a more pronounced in- and outflow curve than the original iCSF method. With the pcCSF method, the BOLD-CSF coupling was stronger (mean cross-correlation peak increase = 0.22, p = .008) and with a 1.9 s shorter temporal lag (p = .016), as compared to using the original iCSF technique.

Conclusions: In this study, we introduce a new method to study the coupling of CSF flow measured in the fourth ventricle to cortical BOLD fluctuations. In contrast to the original approach, the use of phase contrast MRI to measure CSF flow provides a quantitative in- and outflow curve, and improved BOLD-CSF coupling metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: "Fluids and Barriers of the CNS" is a scholarly open access journal that specializes in the intricate world of the central nervous system's fluids and barriers, which are pivotal for the health and well-being of the human body. This journal is a peer-reviewed platform that welcomes research manuscripts exploring the full spectrum of CNS fluids and barriers, with a particular focus on their roles in both health and disease. At the heart of this journal's interest is the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a vital fluid that circulates within the brain and spinal cord, playing a multifaceted role in the normal functioning of the brain and in various neurological conditions. The journal delves into the composition, circulation, and absorption of CSF, as well as its relationship with the parenchymal interstitial fluid and the neurovascular unit at the blood-brain barrier (BBB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信