利妥昔单抗、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂和环磷酰胺治疗原发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性比较:一项单中心回顾性分析

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Luying Lu, Shasha Cai, Huayan Zhu, Guangjun Liu, Yaomin Wang, Pingping Ren, Lan Lan, Xiaoqi Shen, Liangliang Chen, Ying Xu, Jun Cheng, Xiayu Li, Jianghua Chen, Fei Han
{"title":"利妥昔单抗、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂和环磷酰胺治疗原发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性比较:一项单中心回顾性分析","authors":"Luying Lu, Shasha Cai, Huayan Zhu, Guangjun Liu, Yaomin Wang, Pingping Ren, Lan Lan, Xiaoqi Shen, Liangliang Chen, Ying Xu, Jun Cheng, Xiayu Li, Jianghua Chen, Fei Han","doi":"10.1186/s12882-024-03912-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus glucocorticoids in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 478 biopsy-proven PMN patients in single center were retrospectively included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 258 patients were included in RTX, CNI or CTX group (86 patients in each group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, there were no differences on serum creatinine, eGFR, serum albumin, urine protein, anti-PLA2R antibody levels among groups. The follow-up duration was 12 (10.5, 18) months in CNI group, 12 (12, 18) months in CTX group and 12 (12, 18) months in RTX group. Throughout entire follow-up period, 39 patients (45.3%) in CNI group, 47 patients (54.7%) in CTX group, and 59 patients (68.6%) in RTX group achieved total remission (TR, either complete remission or partial remission). The survival curve showed a higher rate of TR in RTX group than CNI group (p = 0.018). A relapse occurred in 15 of 39 (38.5%) patients in CNI group, significantly higher than CTX group (4.3%, p < 0.001) and RTX group (3.4%, p < 0.001). In CNI group, 36% patients had a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX may be more effective than CNI in inducing remission in PMN and showed similar efficacy to CTX. CNI may have a high risk of proteinuria relapse and eGFR decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"25 1","pages":"473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparations of efficacy and safety of rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors and cyclophosphamide in primary membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luying Lu, Shasha Cai, Huayan Zhu, Guangjun Liu, Yaomin Wang, Pingping Ren, Lan Lan, Xiaoqi Shen, Liangliang Chen, Ying Xu, Jun Cheng, Xiayu Li, Jianghua Chen, Fei Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-024-03912-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus glucocorticoids in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 478 biopsy-proven PMN patients in single center were retrospectively included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 258 patients were included in RTX, CNI or CTX group (86 patients in each group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, there were no differences on serum creatinine, eGFR, serum albumin, urine protein, anti-PLA2R antibody levels among groups. The follow-up duration was 12 (10.5, 18) months in CNI group, 12 (12, 18) months in CTX group and 12 (12, 18) months in RTX group. Throughout entire follow-up period, 39 patients (45.3%) in CNI group, 47 patients (54.7%) in CTX group, and 59 patients (68.6%) in RTX group achieved total remission (TR, either complete remission or partial remission). The survival curve showed a higher rate of TR in RTX group than CNI group (p = 0.018). A relapse occurred in 15 of 39 (38.5%) patients in CNI group, significantly higher than CTX group (4.3%, p < 0.001) and RTX group (3.4%, p < 0.001). In CNI group, 36% patients had a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX may be more effective than CNI in inducing remission in PMN and showed similar efficacy to CTX. CNI may have a high risk of proteinuria relapse and eGFR decline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03912-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03912-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较利妥昔单抗(RTX)、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)和环磷酰胺(CTX)联合糖皮质激素治疗原发性膜性肾病(PMN)的疗效和安全性。方法:对单中心478例经活检证实的PMN患者进行回顾性分析。经1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,258例患者被纳入RTX、CNI或CTX组(每组86例)。结果:PSM后各组患者血清肌酐、eGFR、血清白蛋白、尿蛋白、抗pla2r抗体水平无显著差异。CNI组随访12(10.5,18)个月,CTX组随访12(12,18)个月,RTX组随访12(12,18)个月。在整个随访期间,CNI组39例(45.3%)患者,CTX组47例(54.7%)患者,RTX组59例(68.6%)患者达到完全缓解(TR,完全缓解或部分缓解)。生存曲线显示RTX组TR率高于CNI组(p = 0.018)。39例患者中,CNI组复发15例(38.5%),显著高于CTX组(4.3%),p结论:RTX在诱导PMN缓解方面可能比CNI更有效,且与CTX疗效相近。CNI可能有蛋白尿复发和eGFR下降的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparations of efficacy and safety of rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors and cyclophosphamide in primary membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus glucocorticoids in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).

Methods: Totally 478 biopsy-proven PMN patients in single center were retrospectively included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 258 patients were included in RTX, CNI or CTX group (86 patients in each group).

Results: After PSM, there were no differences on serum creatinine, eGFR, serum albumin, urine protein, anti-PLA2R antibody levels among groups. The follow-up duration was 12 (10.5, 18) months in CNI group, 12 (12, 18) months in CTX group and 12 (12, 18) months in RTX group. Throughout entire follow-up period, 39 patients (45.3%) in CNI group, 47 patients (54.7%) in CTX group, and 59 patients (68.6%) in RTX group achieved total remission (TR, either complete remission or partial remission). The survival curve showed a higher rate of TR in RTX group than CNI group (p = 0.018). A relapse occurred in 15 of 39 (38.5%) patients in CNI group, significantly higher than CTX group (4.3%, p < 0.001) and RTX group (3.4%, p < 0.001). In CNI group, 36% patients had a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR.

Conclusions: RTX may be more effective than CNI in inducing remission in PMN and showed similar efficacy to CTX. CNI may have a high risk of proteinuria relapse and eGFR decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信