梯级水力发电系统中混合抽水蓄能电站商业模式的比较经济分析——以黄河上游为例

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Hongji Zhang , Tao Ding , Chenggang Mu , Wenhao Jia , Xingyu Liu , Yuzheng Liu , Yuankang He , Xiaoqiang Sun
{"title":"梯级水力发电系统中混合抽水蓄能电站商业模式的比较经济分析——以黄河上游为例","authors":"Hongji Zhang ,&nbsp;Tao Ding ,&nbsp;Chenggang Mu ,&nbsp;Wenhao Jia ,&nbsp;Xingyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yuzheng Liu ,&nbsp;Yuankang He ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pumped storage power plants demonstrate significant potential in enhancing the flexible regulation capabilities of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy sources. Mixed pumped storage power plants (MPSPPs), developed on conventional hydropower stations, have recently gained attention in the hydropower industry, with shorter construction timelines compared to traditional pumped storage stations. This paper constructs an economic analysis model for MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems and proposes three representative business models for these plants. Taking the Upper Yellow River clean energy base in China as a case study, this research comprehensively assesses the differences in beneficiary structures, revenue allocation mechanisms, and corresponding electricity price schemes when operating MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems under different business models. The economic feasibility of MPSPPs for each commercial model is also analyzed. Under the current policy expectations in China, the results show that the joint business model emerges as the most effective in maximizing the profitability of MPSPPs, which yields the levelized cost of storage of 0.2139–0.2641 CNY/kWh. Consequently, the energy sector can encourage MPSPPs to participate in the power dispatching process with more flexible operational business models. Combined with policy support for configuring renewable energy generators and energy storage facilities, this can better realize their value in large-scale clean energy bases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 144577"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative economic analysis across business models of mixed pumped storage power plants in cascade hydropower systems: A case study of the Upper Yellow River in China\",\"authors\":\"Hongji Zhang ,&nbsp;Tao Ding ,&nbsp;Chenggang Mu ,&nbsp;Wenhao Jia ,&nbsp;Xingyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yuzheng Liu ,&nbsp;Yuankang He ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pumped storage power plants demonstrate significant potential in enhancing the flexible regulation capabilities of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy sources. Mixed pumped storage power plants (MPSPPs), developed on conventional hydropower stations, have recently gained attention in the hydropower industry, with shorter construction timelines compared to traditional pumped storage stations. This paper constructs an economic analysis model for MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems and proposes three representative business models for these plants. Taking the Upper Yellow River clean energy base in China as a case study, this research comprehensively assesses the differences in beneficiary structures, revenue allocation mechanisms, and corresponding electricity price schemes when operating MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems under different business models. The economic feasibility of MPSPPs for each commercial model is also analyzed. Under the current policy expectations in China, the results show that the joint business model emerges as the most effective in maximizing the profitability of MPSPPs, which yields the levelized cost of storage of 0.2139–0.2641 CNY/kWh. Consequently, the energy sector can encourage MPSPPs to participate in the power dispatching process with more flexible operational business models. Combined with policy support for configuring renewable energy generators and energy storage facilities, this can better realize their value in large-scale clean energy bases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"496 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抽水蓄能电站在提高可再生能源高渗透率电力系统的灵活调节能力方面显示出巨大的潜力。混合抽水蓄能电站是在传统水电站基础上发展起来的一种新型电站,其建设工期较传统抽水蓄能电站短,近年来受到水电行业的关注。本文构建了梯级水电系统多电站的经济分析模型,并提出了三种具有代表性的多电站商业模式。本研究以中国黄河上游清洁能源基地为例,综合评估了不同商业模式下梯级水电系统运行mpspp的受益结构、收益分配机制和相应电价方案的差异。分析了各商业模式下MPSPPs的经济可行性。结果表明,在中国当前的政策预期下,联合商业模式对MPSPPs的盈利能力最大化最为有效,其平准化储能成本为0.2139-0.2641元/千瓦时。因此,能源部门可以鼓励mpsp以更灵活的运营商业模式参与电力调度过程。结合对可再生能源发电机组和储能设施配置的政策支持,可以更好地实现其在大型清洁能源基地的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative economic analysis across business models of mixed pumped storage power plants in cascade hydropower systems: A case study of the Upper Yellow River in China
Pumped storage power plants demonstrate significant potential in enhancing the flexible regulation capabilities of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy sources. Mixed pumped storage power plants (MPSPPs), developed on conventional hydropower stations, have recently gained attention in the hydropower industry, with shorter construction timelines compared to traditional pumped storage stations. This paper constructs an economic analysis model for MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems and proposes three representative business models for these plants. Taking the Upper Yellow River clean energy base in China as a case study, this research comprehensively assesses the differences in beneficiary structures, revenue allocation mechanisms, and corresponding electricity price schemes when operating MPSPPs in cascade hydropower systems under different business models. The economic feasibility of MPSPPs for each commercial model is also analyzed. Under the current policy expectations in China, the results show that the joint business model emerges as the most effective in maximizing the profitability of MPSPPs, which yields the levelized cost of storage of 0.2139–0.2641 CNY/kWh. Consequently, the energy sector can encourage MPSPPs to participate in the power dispatching process with more flexible operational business models. Combined with policy support for configuring renewable energy generators and energy storage facilities, this can better realize their value in large-scale clean energy bases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信