{"title":"与标准布比卡因相比,脂质体对微创胸外科患者肋间神经阻滞的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ruliang Chen, Zhibo Wang","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2440910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review aimed to provide evidence on the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as compared to standard bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks (ICB) in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies published on the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase up to June 20, 2024, were included. Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalents, pain scores, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two RCTs and eight observational studies were included. Eight hundred and four patients received liposomal bupivacaine while 631 patients received standard bupivacaine in the included studies. The meta-analysis showed that the use of liposomal bupivacaine for ICB did not reduce opioid consumption as compared to standard bupivacaine at 24 h, 48 h, and for the total duration of hospitalization. Pain scores were also not significantly different between the two groups at 24 h and 48 h. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the LOS between intervention and control groups. Subgroup analysis based on study design also generated similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-quality evidence shows that liposomal bupivacaine does not offer additional benefits over standard bupivacaine when used for ICB in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of liposomal as compared to standard bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ruliang Chen, Zhibo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2024.2440910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review aimed to provide evidence on the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as compared to standard bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks (ICB) in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies published on the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase up to June 20, 2024, were included. Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalents, pain scores, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two RCTs and eight observational studies were included. Eight hundred and four patients received liposomal bupivacaine while 631 patients received standard bupivacaine in the included studies. The meta-analysis showed that the use of liposomal bupivacaine for ICB did not reduce opioid consumption as compared to standard bupivacaine at 24 h, 48 h, and for the total duration of hospitalization. Pain scores were also not significantly different between the two groups at 24 h and 48 h. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the LOS between intervention and control groups. Subgroup analysis based on study design also generated similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-quality evidence shows that liposomal bupivacaine does not offer additional benefits over standard bupivacaine when used for ICB in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2440910\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2440910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本综述旨在为布比卡因脂质体与标准布比卡因在微创胸外科患者肋间神经阻滞(ICB)中的疗效提供证据。方法:纳入截至2024年6月20日在PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science和Embase数据库中发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)和比较观察性研究。比较吗啡当量、疼痛评分和住院时间(LOS)的阿片类药物总消耗量。结果:纳入2项随机对照试验和8项观察性研究。在纳入的研究中,840例患者接受脂质体布比卡因治疗,631例患者接受标准布比卡因治疗。荟萃分析显示,与标准布比卡因相比,在24小时、48小时和总住院时间内,使用布比卡因脂质体治疗ICB并没有减少阿片类药物的消耗。两组在24 h和48 h的疼痛评分也无显著差异。meta分析显示,干预组与对照组的LOS无差异。基于研究设计的亚组分析也产生了类似的结果。结论:大多数低质量的证据表明,在微创胸外科患者中使用脂质体布比卡因治疗ICB时,与标准布比卡因相比,布比卡因没有额外的益处。
Efficacy of liposomal as compared to standard bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: This review aimed to provide evidence on the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as compared to standard bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blocks (ICB) in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies published on the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase up to June 20, 2024, were included. Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalents, pain scores, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared.
Results: Two RCTs and eight observational studies were included. Eight hundred and four patients received liposomal bupivacaine while 631 patients received standard bupivacaine in the included studies. The meta-analysis showed that the use of liposomal bupivacaine for ICB did not reduce opioid consumption as compared to standard bupivacaine at 24 h, 48 h, and for the total duration of hospitalization. Pain scores were also not significantly different between the two groups at 24 h and 48 h. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the LOS between intervention and control groups. Subgroup analysis based on study design also generated similar results.
Conclusions: Mostly low-quality evidence shows that liposomal bupivacaine does not offer additional benefits over standard bupivacaine when used for ICB in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
期刊介绍:
Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.