危机环境下儿童疫苗接种决策:实践和障碍调查

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Page M Light, Neha S Singh, Mervat Alhaffar, Lauren E Allison, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Ruwan Ratnayake, Francesco Checchi, Nada Abdelmagid
{"title":"危机环境下儿童疫苗接种决策:实践和障碍调查","authors":"Page M Light, Neha S Singh, Mervat Alhaffar, Lauren E Allison, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Ruwan Ratnayake, Francesco Checchi, Nada Abdelmagid","doi":"10.1186/s13031-024-00638-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children, particularly those who have received no routine vaccinations (zero-dose children), are at high risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in humanitarian crisis settings. However, the decision-making processes underlying vaccine intervention design and delivery in such settings are poorly understood. The present study investigated the decision-making practices of organisations involved in childhood vaccination in humanitarian crisis settings globally via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals involved in the design or delivery of childhood vaccination programmes in humanitarian crisis settings were invited to fill out a self-administered online survey. Respondents were asked about factors influencing intervention design and vaccine delivery; use of technical guidance, specifically the WHO decision-making framework for vaccination in acute humanitarian emergencies (WHO Framework); and practices for reaching zero-dose children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen responses were received. Large international organisations and UN agencies were overrepresented in the sample. Technical guidance was considered of high importance when designing vaccine interventions. However, the WHO Framework is not available in relevant languages and has not been well-distributed to local and national actors. Awareness of initiatives to reach zero-dose children was high within our sample, though this may not accurately reflect global awareness. Security and resource availability were key barriers to vaccine delivery and reaching zero-dose children. Problems with vaccine access in our sample pertained primarily to issues with the procurement system rather than vaccine cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO Framework should be provided in more languages, and vaccination actors at local and national level should be engaged to improve its practicality and increase awareness of its aims. In order to reach zero-dose children, vaccines must be made available for use in expanded age groups, which is sometimes not currently feasible within the Gavi/UNICEF procurement system. Clarifying this policy would allow relevant organisations to reach more zero-dose children. Additionally, security is a key barrier impeding vaccine delivery, including for zero-dose children. Safe operational space for humanitarian actors in conflict must be maintained and global conflict resolution mechanisms improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making for childhood vaccination in crisis settings: a survey of practice & barriers.\",\"authors\":\"Page M Light, Neha S Singh, Mervat Alhaffar, Lauren E Allison, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Ruwan Ratnayake, Francesco Checchi, Nada Abdelmagid\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13031-024-00638-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children, particularly those who have received no routine vaccinations (zero-dose children), are at high risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in humanitarian crisis settings. However, the decision-making processes underlying vaccine intervention design and delivery in such settings are poorly understood. The present study investigated the decision-making practices of organisations involved in childhood vaccination in humanitarian crisis settings globally via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals involved in the design or delivery of childhood vaccination programmes in humanitarian crisis settings were invited to fill out a self-administered online survey. Respondents were asked about factors influencing intervention design and vaccine delivery; use of technical guidance, specifically the WHO decision-making framework for vaccination in acute humanitarian emergencies (WHO Framework); and practices for reaching zero-dose children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen responses were received. Large international organisations and UN agencies were overrepresented in the sample. Technical guidance was considered of high importance when designing vaccine interventions. However, the WHO Framework is not available in relevant languages and has not been well-distributed to local and national actors. Awareness of initiatives to reach zero-dose children was high within our sample, though this may not accurately reflect global awareness. Security and resource availability were key barriers to vaccine delivery and reaching zero-dose children. Problems with vaccine access in our sample pertained primarily to issues with the procurement system rather than vaccine cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO Framework should be provided in more languages, and vaccination actors at local and national level should be engaged to improve its practicality and increase awareness of its aims. In order to reach zero-dose children, vaccines must be made available for use in expanded age groups, which is sometimes not currently feasible within the Gavi/UNICEF procurement system. Clarifying this policy would allow relevant organisations to reach more zero-dose children. Additionally, security is a key barrier impeding vaccine delivery, including for zero-dose children. Safe operational space for humanitarian actors in conflict must be maintained and global conflict resolution mechanisms improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict and Health\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00638-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00638-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在人道主义危机环境中,儿童,特别是那些没有接受常规疫苗接种的儿童(零剂量儿童),患疫苗可预防疾病的风险很高。然而,在这种情况下,人们对疫苗干预设计和提供的决策过程知之甚少。本研究通过一项在线调查调查了在全球人道主义危机环境中参与儿童疫苗接种的组织的决策实践。方法:邀请在人道主义危机环境中参与设计或实施儿童疫苗接种规划的个人填写一份自我管理的在线调查。受访者被问及影响干预措施设计和疫苗提供的因素;使用技术指导,特别是世卫组织关于严重人道主义紧急情况中疫苗接种的决策框架(世卫组织框架);以及接触零剂量儿童的做法。结果:共收到14份回复。大型国际组织和联合国机构在样本中的代表性过高。在设计疫苗干预措施时,技术指导被认为非常重要。然而,世卫组织框架没有相关语文版本,也没有很好地分发给地方和国家行动者。在我们的样本中,对接触零剂量儿童的举措的认识很高,尽管这可能无法准确反映全球的认识。安全和资源可得性是提供疫苗和惠及零剂量儿童的主要障碍。在我们的样本中,疫苗获取的问题主要与采购系统有关,而不是与疫苗成本有关。结论:世卫组织框架应以更多的语言提供,地方和国家层面的疫苗接种行为者应参与进来,以提高其实用性并提高对其目标的认识。为了达到零剂量儿童,必须提供疫苗以供扩大年龄组使用,这在目前免疫联盟/儿童基金会采购系统内有时是不可行的。澄清这一政策将使相关组织能够接触到更多的零剂量儿童。此外,安全性是阻碍疫苗交付的关键障碍,包括对零剂量儿童的疫苗交付。必须维护冲突中人道主义行为体的安全行动空间,并改进全球冲突解决机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-making for childhood vaccination in crisis settings: a survey of practice & barriers.

Background: Children, particularly those who have received no routine vaccinations (zero-dose children), are at high risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in humanitarian crisis settings. However, the decision-making processes underlying vaccine intervention design and delivery in such settings are poorly understood. The present study investigated the decision-making practices of organisations involved in childhood vaccination in humanitarian crisis settings globally via an online survey.

Methods: Individuals involved in the design or delivery of childhood vaccination programmes in humanitarian crisis settings were invited to fill out a self-administered online survey. Respondents were asked about factors influencing intervention design and vaccine delivery; use of technical guidance, specifically the WHO decision-making framework for vaccination in acute humanitarian emergencies (WHO Framework); and practices for reaching zero-dose children.

Results: Fourteen responses were received. Large international organisations and UN agencies were overrepresented in the sample. Technical guidance was considered of high importance when designing vaccine interventions. However, the WHO Framework is not available in relevant languages and has not been well-distributed to local and national actors. Awareness of initiatives to reach zero-dose children was high within our sample, though this may not accurately reflect global awareness. Security and resource availability were key barriers to vaccine delivery and reaching zero-dose children. Problems with vaccine access in our sample pertained primarily to issues with the procurement system rather than vaccine cost.

Conclusions: The WHO Framework should be provided in more languages, and vaccination actors at local and national level should be engaged to improve its practicality and increase awareness of its aims. In order to reach zero-dose children, vaccines must be made available for use in expanded age groups, which is sometimes not currently feasible within the Gavi/UNICEF procurement system. Clarifying this policy would allow relevant organisations to reach more zero-dose children. Additionally, security is a key barrier impeding vaccine delivery, including for zero-dose children. Safe operational space for humanitarian actors in conflict must be maintained and global conflict resolution mechanisms improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信