猫支原体PCR检测与猫下呼吸道疾病的临床及预后相关性

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thibaud Robin, Marie Bigay, Chloé Touzet, Kevin Le Boedec
{"title":"猫支原体PCR检测与猫下呼吸道疾病的临床及预后相关性","authors":"Thibaud Robin, Marie Bigay, Chloé Touzet, Kevin Le Boedec","doi":"10.1177/1098612X241297870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare two groups of cats with lower respiratory tract disease, one with <i>Mycoplasma felis</i> detected by PCR in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (M+) and the other without (M-), with regard to signalment, clinical signs, diagnostic results, treatment response and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All cats for which <i>M felis</i> was investigated by PCR in BALF between 2016 and 2023 were included. Cats with evidence of oropharyngeal contamination, or for which PCR results were under the quantification level, or without follow-up information were excluded. Cats that had received antibiotics effective against <i>M felis</i> before BALF collection were excluded if PCR results were negative. Follow-up information was retrieved from the medical records and by contacting referring veterinarians and owners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 cats were included (19 in the M+ group and 36 in the M- group). Significant differences were detected between the two groups in the prevalence of systemic signs (M+: 0%, M-: 28%; <i>P</i> = 0.01), bronchial collapse on bronchoscopy (M+: 28%, M-: 6%; <i>P</i> = 0.03), radiographic alveolar lesions (M+: 57%, M-: 24%; <i>P</i> = 0.04), and percentage of neutrophils (M+: 65%, M-: 35%; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and eosinophils (M+: 9%, M-: 25%; <i>P</i> = 0.03) in the BALF. Antibiotics were used more frequently in M+ cats (M+: 90%, M-: 42%; <i>P</i> = 0.001) than in M- cats. No significant difference was found in treatment response (short term: <i>P</i> = 0.94, long term: <i>P</i> = 0.28) and risk of death (<i>P</i> = 0.42) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The presence of radiographic alveolar lesions and neutrophilia in BALF was significantly associated with the detection of <i>M felis</i> in BALF. This association might be causal, consequential or contextual (ie, sharing the same cause). The detection of <i>M felis</i> in BALF did not negatively impact prognosis but the necessity to treat <i>M felis</i> using targeted antibiotics remains to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":"26 12","pages":"1098612X241297870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and prognostic relevance of <i>Mycoplasma felis</i> PCR detection in feline lower respiratory tract disease.\",\"authors\":\"Thibaud Robin, Marie Bigay, Chloé Touzet, Kevin Le Boedec\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1098612X241297870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare two groups of cats with lower respiratory tract disease, one with <i>Mycoplasma felis</i> detected by PCR in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (M+) and the other without (M-), with regard to signalment, clinical signs, diagnostic results, treatment response and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All cats for which <i>M felis</i> was investigated by PCR in BALF between 2016 and 2023 were included. Cats with evidence of oropharyngeal contamination, or for which PCR results were under the quantification level, or without follow-up information were excluded. Cats that had received antibiotics effective against <i>M felis</i> before BALF collection were excluded if PCR results were negative. Follow-up information was retrieved from the medical records and by contacting referring veterinarians and owners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 cats were included (19 in the M+ group and 36 in the M- group). Significant differences were detected between the two groups in the prevalence of systemic signs (M+: 0%, M-: 28%; <i>P</i> = 0.01), bronchial collapse on bronchoscopy (M+: 28%, M-: 6%; <i>P</i> = 0.03), radiographic alveolar lesions (M+: 57%, M-: 24%; <i>P</i> = 0.04), and percentage of neutrophils (M+: 65%, M-: 35%; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and eosinophils (M+: 9%, M-: 25%; <i>P</i> = 0.03) in the BALF. Antibiotics were used more frequently in M+ cats (M+: 90%, M-: 42%; <i>P</i> = 0.001) than in M- cats. No significant difference was found in treatment response (short term: <i>P</i> = 0.94, long term: <i>P</i> = 0.28) and risk of death (<i>P</i> = 0.42) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The presence of radiographic alveolar lesions and neutrophilia in BALF was significantly associated with the detection of <i>M felis</i> in BALF. This association might be causal, consequential or contextual (ie, sharing the same cause). The detection of <i>M felis</i> in BALF did not negatively impact prognosis but the necessity to treat <i>M felis</i> using targeted antibiotics remains to be determined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"26 12\",\"pages\":\"1098612X241297870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X241297870\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X241297870","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性队列研究的目的是比较两组患有下呼吸道疾病的猫,一组通过PCR在支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中检测到猫支原体(M+),另一组没有(M-),在信号、临床体征、诊断结果、治疗反应和生存方面的差异。方法:选取2016 - 2023年PCR检测BALF的所有猫。有口咽污染证据的猫,或PCR结果低于定量水平的猫,或没有随访信息的猫被排除在外。如果PCR结果为阴性,则在BALF采集前接受过对猫分枝杆菌有效的抗生素治疗的猫被排除在外。通过联系转诊兽医和宠物主人,从医疗记录中检索了后续信息。结果:共纳入55只猫(M+组19只,M-组36只)。两组在系统性体征的患病率方面存在显著差异(M+: 0%, M-: 28%;P = 0.01),支气管镜检查支气管塌陷(M+: 28%, M-: 6%;P = 0.03),胸片肺泡病变(M+: 57%, M-: 24%;P = 0.04),中性粒细胞百分比(M+: 65%, M-: 35%;P = 0.002)和嗜酸性粒细胞(M+: 9%, M-: 25%;P = 0.03)。抗生素在M+猫中使用频率更高(M+: 90%, M-: 42%;P = 0.001)。两组治疗反应(短期:P = 0.94,长期:P = 0.28)和死亡风险(P = 0.42)无显著差异。结论及相关性:肺泡病变和中性粒细胞的存在与BALF中M - felis的检测有显著相关性。这种联系可能是因果的,结果的或上下文的(即共享相同的原因)。在BALF中检测到M felis对预后没有负面影响,但是否需要使用靶向抗生素治疗M felis仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and prognostic relevance of Mycoplasma felis PCR detection in feline lower respiratory tract disease.

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare two groups of cats with lower respiratory tract disease, one with Mycoplasma felis detected by PCR in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (M+) and the other without (M-), with regard to signalment, clinical signs, diagnostic results, treatment response and survival.

Methods: All cats for which M felis was investigated by PCR in BALF between 2016 and 2023 were included. Cats with evidence of oropharyngeal contamination, or for which PCR results were under the quantification level, or without follow-up information were excluded. Cats that had received antibiotics effective against M felis before BALF collection were excluded if PCR results were negative. Follow-up information was retrieved from the medical records and by contacting referring veterinarians and owners.

Results: A total of 55 cats were included (19 in the M+ group and 36 in the M- group). Significant differences were detected between the two groups in the prevalence of systemic signs (M+: 0%, M-: 28%; P = 0.01), bronchial collapse on bronchoscopy (M+: 28%, M-: 6%; P = 0.03), radiographic alveolar lesions (M+: 57%, M-: 24%; P = 0.04), and percentage of neutrophils (M+: 65%, M-: 35%; P = 0.002) and eosinophils (M+: 9%, M-: 25%; P = 0.03) in the BALF. Antibiotics were used more frequently in M+ cats (M+: 90%, M-: 42%; P = 0.001) than in M- cats. No significant difference was found in treatment response (short term: P = 0.94, long term: P = 0.28) and risk of death (P = 0.42) between the two groups.

Conclusions and relevance: The presence of radiographic alveolar lesions and neutrophilia in BALF was significantly associated with the detection of M felis in BALF. This association might be causal, consequential or contextual (ie, sharing the same cause). The detection of M felis in BALF did not negatively impact prognosis but the necessity to treat M felis using targeted antibiotics remains to be determined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信