持续气道正压和降压药物治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停相关高血压的比较疗效:一项叙述性综述。

IF 3.1 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Olumide Damilola Akinmoju, Gbolahan Olatunji, Emmanuel Kokori, Ikponmwosa Jude Ogieuhi, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Emeka Stanley Obi, Chidera Stanley Anthony, Odemona Glory Toluwanibukun, Adewunmi Akingbola, Adedoyin Esther Alao, Adenowo Goodness Boluwatife, Aarushi Venkatraman, Areesha Babar, Nicholas Aderinto
{"title":"持续气道正压和降压药物治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停相关高血压的比较疗效:一项叙述性综述。","authors":"Olumide Damilola Akinmoju, Gbolahan Olatunji, Emmanuel Kokori, Ikponmwosa Jude Ogieuhi, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Emeka Stanley Obi, Chidera Stanley Anthony, Odemona Glory Toluwanibukun, Adewunmi Akingbola, Adedoyin Esther Alao, Adenowo Goodness Boluwatife, Aarushi Venkatraman, Areesha Babar, Nicholas Aderinto","doi":"10.1007/s40292-024-00691-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents a significant global health concern, affecting a substantial portion of the population, particularly among young and middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review aims to assess the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared to antihypertensive medications in managing OSA-related hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding studies published from 2000 to March 2024 that investigated CPAP, antihypertensives, or their combination therapy in OSA patients. Six definitive studies were analyzed, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, one placebo-controlled trial, one open-label multicenter trial, and one longitudinal cohort study. These studies comprised 939 participants, with intervention durations ranging from four weeks to six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of CPAP monotherapy revealed variable efficacy, with some studies demonstrating significant reductions in 24-hour mean blood pressure and diastolic pressure, while others reported non-significant changes. CPAP therapy combined with antihypertensives showed additive effects, particularly in reducing office blood pressure measurements. Antihypertensive medications, such as valsartan, exhibited superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure compared to CPAP alone. Factors influencing therapy effectiveness included CPAP compliance, patient characteristics, and coexisting comorbidities. Patients with good CPAP adherence experienced greater reductions in blood pressure. The duration of exposure to OSA and the type of hypertension also impacted the therapy response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While CPAP and antihypertensive medications offer significant benefits in managing hypertension among OSA patients, challenges such as CPAP intolerance and medication side effects exist. Personalized treatment considering individual patient factors is crucial for optimal management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12890,"journal":{"name":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Antihypertensive Medications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Related Hypertension: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Olumide Damilola Akinmoju, Gbolahan Olatunji, Emmanuel Kokori, Ikponmwosa Jude Ogieuhi, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Emeka Stanley Obi, Chidera Stanley Anthony, Odemona Glory Toluwanibukun, Adewunmi Akingbola, Adedoyin Esther Alao, Adenowo Goodness Boluwatife, Aarushi Venkatraman, Areesha Babar, Nicholas Aderinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40292-024-00691-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents a significant global health concern, affecting a substantial portion of the population, particularly among young and middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review aims to assess the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared to antihypertensive medications in managing OSA-related hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding studies published from 2000 to March 2024 that investigated CPAP, antihypertensives, or their combination therapy in OSA patients. Six definitive studies were analyzed, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, one placebo-controlled trial, one open-label multicenter trial, and one longitudinal cohort study. These studies comprised 939 participants, with intervention durations ranging from four weeks to six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of CPAP monotherapy revealed variable efficacy, with some studies demonstrating significant reductions in 24-hour mean blood pressure and diastolic pressure, while others reported non-significant changes. CPAP therapy combined with antihypertensives showed additive effects, particularly in reducing office blood pressure measurements. Antihypertensive medications, such as valsartan, exhibited superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure compared to CPAP alone. Factors influencing therapy effectiveness included CPAP compliance, patient characteristics, and coexisting comorbidities. Patients with good CPAP adherence experienced greater reductions in blood pressure. The duration of exposure to OSA and the type of hypertension also impacted the therapy response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While CPAP and antihypertensive medications offer significant benefits in managing hypertension among OSA patients, challenges such as CPAP intolerance and medication side effects exist. Personalized treatment considering individual patient factors is crucial for optimal management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00691-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00691-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梗阻性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一个重要的全球健康问题,影响了相当一部分人口,特别是青壮年。目的:本综述旨在评估持续气道正压通气(CPAP)与降压药物治疗osa相关性高血压的疗效。方法:对多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,检索了2000年至2024年3月发表的关于OSA患者使用CPAP、抗高血压药物或其联合治疗的研究。我们分析了6项权威性研究,包括2项随机对照试验(rct)、1项随机双盲安慰剂对照交叉试验、1项安慰剂对照试验、1项开放标签多中心试验和1项纵向队列研究。这些研究包括939名参与者,干预时间从四周到六个月不等。结果:CPAP单药治疗的分析显示疗效不一,一些研究显示24小时平均血压和舒张压显著降低,而另一些研究报告无显著变化。CPAP联合抗高血压药物显示出叠加效应,特别是在降低办公室血压测量值方面。降压药物,如缬沙坦,与单独CPAP相比,在降低血压方面表现出优越的疗效。影响治疗效果的因素包括CPAP依从性、患者特征和共存的合并症。良好的CPAP依从性患者血压下降幅度更大。暴露于OSA的持续时间和高血压类型也会影响治疗反应。结论:虽然CPAP和抗高血压药物在控制OSA患者高血压方面有显著的益处,但存在CPAP不耐受和药物副作用等挑战。考虑个体患者因素的个性化治疗对于最佳管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Antihypertensive Medications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Related Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents a significant global health concern, affecting a substantial portion of the population, particularly among young and middle-aged adults.

Aim: This review aims to assess the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared to antihypertensive medications in managing OSA-related hypertension.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding studies published from 2000 to March 2024 that investigated CPAP, antihypertensives, or their combination therapy in OSA patients. Six definitive studies were analyzed, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, one placebo-controlled trial, one open-label multicenter trial, and one longitudinal cohort study. These studies comprised 939 participants, with intervention durations ranging from four weeks to six months.

Results: Analysis of CPAP monotherapy revealed variable efficacy, with some studies demonstrating significant reductions in 24-hour mean blood pressure and diastolic pressure, while others reported non-significant changes. CPAP therapy combined with antihypertensives showed additive effects, particularly in reducing office blood pressure measurements. Antihypertensive medications, such as valsartan, exhibited superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure compared to CPAP alone. Factors influencing therapy effectiveness included CPAP compliance, patient characteristics, and coexisting comorbidities. Patients with good CPAP adherence experienced greater reductions in blood pressure. The duration of exposure to OSA and the type of hypertension also impacted the therapy response.

Conclusion: While CPAP and antihypertensive medications offer significant benefits in managing hypertension among OSA patients, challenges such as CPAP intolerance and medication side effects exist. Personalized treatment considering individual patient factors is crucial for optimal management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention promotes knowledge, update and discussion in the field of hypertension and cardiovascular disease prevention, by providing a regular programme of independent review articles covering key aspects of the management of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The journal includes:   Invited ''State of the Art'' reviews.  Expert commentaries on guidelines, major trials, technical advances.Presentation of new intervention trials design.''Pros and Cons'' or round tables on controversial issues.Statements on guidelines from hypertension and cardiovascular scientific societies.Socio-economic issues.Cost/benefit in prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Monitoring of healthcare systems.News and views from the Italian Society of Hypertension (including abstracts).All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信