基于融合驱动半监督学习的双鉴别双生成对抗网络肺结节分类。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ahmed Saihood, Wijdan Rashid Abdulhussien, Laith Alzubaid, Mohamed Manoufali, Yuantong Gu
{"title":"基于融合驱动半监督学习的双鉴别双生成对抗网络肺结节分类。","authors":"Ahmed Saihood, Wijdan Rashid Abdulhussien, Laith Alzubaid, Mohamed Manoufali, Yuantong Gu","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02820-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The detection and classification of lung nodules are crucial in medical imaging, as they significantly impact patient outcomes related to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, existing models often suffer from mode collapse and poor generalizability, as they fail to capture the complete diversity of the data distribution. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture tailored for semi-supervised lung nodule classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed DDDG-GAN model consists of dual generators and discriminators. Each generator specializes in benign or malignant nodules, generating diverse, high-fidelity synthetic images for each class. This dual-generator setup prevents mode collapse. The dual-discriminator framework enhances the model's generalization capability, ensuring better performance on unseen data. Feature fusion techniques are incorporated to refine the model's discriminatory power between benign and malignant nodules. The model is evaluated in two scenarios: (1) training and testing on the LIDC-IDRI dataset and (2) training on LIDC-IDRI, testing on the unseen LUNA16 dataset and the unseen LUNGx dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Scenario 1, the DDDG-GAN achieved an accuracy of 92.56%, a precision of 90.12%, a recall of 95.87%, and an F1 score of 92.77%. In Scenario 2, the model demonstrated robust performance with an accuracy of 72.6%, a precision of 72.3%, a recall of 73.82%, and an F1 score of 73.39% when testing using Luna16 and an accuracy of 71.23%, a precision of 67.56%, a recall of 73.52%, and an F1 score of 70.42% when testing using LungX. The results indicate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DDDG-GAN model mitigates mode collapse and improves generalizability in lung nodule classification. It demonstrates superior performance on both the LIDC-IDRI and the unseen LUNA16 and LungX datasets, offering significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fusion-driven semi-supervised learning-based lung nodules classification with dual-discriminator and dual-generator generative adversarial network.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Saihood, Wijdan Rashid Abdulhussien, Laith Alzubaid, Mohamed Manoufali, Yuantong Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02820-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The detection and classification of lung nodules are crucial in medical imaging, as they significantly impact patient outcomes related to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, existing models often suffer from mode collapse and poor generalizability, as they fail to capture the complete diversity of the data distribution. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture tailored for semi-supervised lung nodule classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed DDDG-GAN model consists of dual generators and discriminators. Each generator specializes in benign or malignant nodules, generating diverse, high-fidelity synthetic images for each class. This dual-generator setup prevents mode collapse. The dual-discriminator framework enhances the model's generalization capability, ensuring better performance on unseen data. Feature fusion techniques are incorporated to refine the model's discriminatory power between benign and malignant nodules. The model is evaluated in two scenarios: (1) training and testing on the LIDC-IDRI dataset and (2) training on LIDC-IDRI, testing on the unseen LUNA16 dataset and the unseen LUNGx dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Scenario 1, the DDDG-GAN achieved an accuracy of 92.56%, a precision of 90.12%, a recall of 95.87%, and an F1 score of 92.77%. In Scenario 2, the model demonstrated robust performance with an accuracy of 72.6%, a precision of 72.3%, a recall of 73.82%, and an F1 score of 73.39% when testing using Luna16 and an accuracy of 71.23%, a precision of 67.56%, a recall of 73.52%, and an F1 score of 70.42% when testing using LungX. The results indicate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DDDG-GAN model mitigates mode collapse and improves generalizability in lung nodule classification. It demonstrates superior performance on both the LIDC-IDRI and the unseen LUNA16 and LungX datasets, offering significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667929/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02820-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02820-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺结节的检测和分类在医学影像学中至关重要,因为它们显著影响与肺癌诊断和治疗相关的患者预后。然而,现有的模型往往存在模式崩溃和较差的泛化性,因为它们无法捕捉数据分布的完整多样性。本研究通过提出一种针对半监督肺结节分类的新型生成对抗网络(GAN)架构来解决这些挑战。方法:提出的DDDG-GAN模型由双生成器和判别器组成。每个生成器专门用于良性或恶性结节,为每个类别生成不同的高保真合成图像。这种双发电机设置防止模式崩溃。双鉴别器框架增强了模型的泛化能力,确保在不可见数据上有更好的性能。采用特征融合技术来改进模型对良、恶性结节的区分能力。该模型分为两种场景进行评估:(1)在LIDC-IDRI数据集上进行训练和测试;(2)在LIDC-IDRI上进行训练,在未见的LUNA16数据集和未见的LUNGx数据集上进行测试。结果:在场景1中,DDDG-GAN的准确率为92.56%,精密度为90.12%,召回率为95.87%,F1得分为92.77%。在场景2中,使用Luna16测试时,模型的准确率为72.6%,精度为72.3%,召回率为73.82%,F1分数为73.39%;使用LungX测试时,模型的准确率为71.23%,精度为67.56%,召回率为73.52%,F1分数为70.42%。结果表明,所提出的模型优于最先进的半监督学习方法。结论:DDDG-GAN模型减轻了模式崩溃,提高了肺结节分类的通用性。它在LIDC-IDRI和未见过的LUNA16和LungX数据集上都表现出卓越的性能,为提高临床实践中的诊断准确性提供了巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fusion-driven semi-supervised learning-based lung nodules classification with dual-discriminator and dual-generator generative adversarial network.

Background: The detection and classification of lung nodules are crucial in medical imaging, as they significantly impact patient outcomes related to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, existing models often suffer from mode collapse and poor generalizability, as they fail to capture the complete diversity of the data distribution. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture tailored for semi-supervised lung nodule classification.

Methods: The proposed DDDG-GAN model consists of dual generators and discriminators. Each generator specializes in benign or malignant nodules, generating diverse, high-fidelity synthetic images for each class. This dual-generator setup prevents mode collapse. The dual-discriminator framework enhances the model's generalization capability, ensuring better performance on unseen data. Feature fusion techniques are incorporated to refine the model's discriminatory power between benign and malignant nodules. The model is evaluated in two scenarios: (1) training and testing on the LIDC-IDRI dataset and (2) training on LIDC-IDRI, testing on the unseen LUNA16 dataset and the unseen LUNGx dataset.

Results: In Scenario 1, the DDDG-GAN achieved an accuracy of 92.56%, a precision of 90.12%, a recall of 95.87%, and an F1 score of 92.77%. In Scenario 2, the model demonstrated robust performance with an accuracy of 72.6%, a precision of 72.3%, a recall of 73.82%, and an F1 score of 73.39% when testing using Luna16 and an accuracy of 71.23%, a precision of 67.56%, a recall of 73.52%, and an F1 score of 70.42% when testing using LungX. The results indicate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning approaches.

Conclusions: The DDDG-GAN model mitigates mode collapse and improves generalizability in lung nodule classification. It demonstrates superior performance on both the LIDC-IDRI and the unseen LUNA16 and LungX datasets, offering significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信