溴隐亭与左旋多巴和其他治疗帕金森病的方法:一项最新的荟萃分析,涉及12项随机临床试验的4000多名患者。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maziar Afshar, Negin Sane, Yousef Moradi
{"title":"溴隐亭与左旋多巴和其他治疗帕金森病的方法:一项最新的荟萃分析,涉及12项随机临床试验的4000多名患者。","authors":"Maziar Afshar, Negin Sane, Yousef Moradi","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02711-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comparative study by systematically examining and analyzing trials that studied the impacts of levodopa and bromocriptine, either separately or together, in treating Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using targeted keywords for studies published up to October 2024. The methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and bias evaluation was performed using RevMan (version 5). Statistical analyses were conducted in STATA version 17, applying random-effects models. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thorough evaluation identified 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4,060 participants, 1,956 in the intervention group and 2,104 in the comparison group, all diagnosed with PD. A combined effect size of 0.18 (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.39) was found through quantitative analysis of motor scales for the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). An effect size of 0.50 (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.80) was determined for dyskinesia. Dystonia occurrences showed a significant effect size of 0.44 (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.81; I2: 87.28%; P value: 0.0001). Hallucination and dizziness occurrences showed effect sizes of 0.91 (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.30) and 1.36 (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91, 2.04) overall, respectively. Quality assessment revealed high-certainty evidence for dyskinesia and dystonia reduction with bromocriptine, while other outcomes showed low to very low certainty. Meta-regression analyses showed no significant correlation between population characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This thorough meta-analysis offers an understanding of how bromocriptine compares in effectiveness to levodopa and other treatments for managing PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bromocriptine Versus Levodopa and other treatments in Parkinson's Disease: an updated Meta-analysis Involving more than 4000 patients across 12 randomized clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Maziar Afshar, Negin Sane, Yousef Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-024-02711-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comparative study by systematically examining and analyzing trials that studied the impacts of levodopa and bromocriptine, either separately or together, in treating Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using targeted keywords for studies published up to October 2024. The methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and bias evaluation was performed using RevMan (version 5). Statistical analyses were conducted in STATA version 17, applying random-effects models. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thorough evaluation identified 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4,060 participants, 1,956 in the intervention group and 2,104 in the comparison group, all diagnosed with PD. A combined effect size of 0.18 (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.39) was found through quantitative analysis of motor scales for the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). An effect size of 0.50 (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.80) was determined for dyskinesia. Dystonia occurrences showed a significant effect size of 0.44 (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.81; I2: 87.28%; P value: 0.0001). Hallucination and dizziness occurrences showed effect sizes of 0.91 (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.30) and 1.36 (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91, 2.04) overall, respectively. Quality assessment revealed high-certainty evidence for dyskinesia and dystonia reduction with bromocriptine, while other outcomes showed low to very low certainty. Meta-regression analyses showed no significant correlation between population characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This thorough meta-analysis offers an understanding of how bromocriptine compares in effectiveness to levodopa and other treatments for managing PD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02711-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02711-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析的目的是通过系统地检查和分析研究左旋多巴和溴隐亭单独或联合治疗帕金森病(PD)影响的试验,进行一项比较研究。方法:对PubMed (Medline)、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行广泛的文献检索,使用目标关键词检索截至2024年10月发表的研究。采用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2)工具评估纳入的rct的方法学质量,并使用RevMan (version 5)进行偏倚评估。采用STATA version 17进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。使用GRADE方法评估证据的总体质量。结果:全面评估确定了12项随机对照试验,共4,060名参与者,干预组1,956名,对照组2,104名,均诊断为PD。综合效应量为0.18 (SMD: 0.18;95% CI: -0.03, 0.39),通过对统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)的运动量表进行定量分析。效应值为0.50 (OR: 0.50;95% CI: 0.31, 0.80)。肌张力障碍发生率的显著效应值为0.44 (OR: 0.44;95% ci: 0.24, 0.81;I2: 87.28%;P值:0.0001)。幻觉和头晕发生的效应量为0.91 (OR: 0.91;95% CI: 0.36, 2.30)和1.36 (OR: 1.36;95% CI: 0.91, 2.04)。质量评估显示,溴隐亭治疗运动障碍和肌张力障碍有高确定性证据,而其他结果则显示低至非常低的确定性。meta回归分析显示人群特征与结果之间无显著相关性。结论:这项全面的荟萃分析提供了溴隐亭与左旋多巴和其他治疗PD的有效性比较的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bromocriptine Versus Levodopa and other treatments in Parkinson's Disease: an updated Meta-analysis Involving more than 4000 patients across 12 randomized clinical trials.

Objectives: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comparative study by systematically examining and analyzing trials that studied the impacts of levodopa and bromocriptine, either separately or together, in treating Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using targeted keywords for studies published up to October 2024. The methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and bias evaluation was performed using RevMan (version 5). Statistical analyses were conducted in STATA version 17, applying random-effects models. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: The thorough evaluation identified 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4,060 participants, 1,956 in the intervention group and 2,104 in the comparison group, all diagnosed with PD. A combined effect size of 0.18 (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.39) was found through quantitative analysis of motor scales for the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). An effect size of 0.50 (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.80) was determined for dyskinesia. Dystonia occurrences showed a significant effect size of 0.44 (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.81; I2: 87.28%; P value: 0.0001). Hallucination and dizziness occurrences showed effect sizes of 0.91 (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.30) and 1.36 (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91, 2.04) overall, respectively. Quality assessment revealed high-certainty evidence for dyskinesia and dystonia reduction with bromocriptine, while other outcomes showed low to very low certainty. Meta-regression analyses showed no significant correlation between population characteristics and outcomes.

Conclusion: This thorough meta-analysis offers an understanding of how bromocriptine compares in effectiveness to levodopa and other treatments for managing PD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信