在住院医师培训计划中优先考虑临床医生教育培训的能力。

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/tct.13848
Bani M. Ratan, Nital P. Appelbaum, Peter J. Boedeker, Sara G. McNeil, Robert C. Hausmann, Teri L. Turner
{"title":"在住院医师培训计划中优先考虑临床医生教育培训的能力。","authors":"Bani M. Ratan,&nbsp;Nital P. Appelbaum,&nbsp;Peter J. Boedeker,&nbsp;Sara G. McNeil,&nbsp;Robert C. Hausmann,&nbsp;Teri L. Turner","doi":"10.1111/tct.13848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Although Clinician Educator Tracks (CETs) have been developed for postgraduate trainees, more clarity is needed regarding which competencies are most relevant to resident and fellow physicians (housestaff) seeking to become Clinician Educators (CEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used the Clinician Educator Milestones, an established framework for competencies at the faculty level, to perform a targeted needs assessment at a large academic institution from April–May 2023. Educational leaders in undergraduate (UME), graduate (GME) and senior medical education (SME) leadership roles were asked to prioritise the Clinician Educator Milestones subcompetencies for a 1-year track. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed; text comments underwent content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 285 leaders, 118 (41%) completed the survey. The average length in educational leadership was 6.9 ± 5.6 years, with 33% having formal education training, 23% representing surgical specialities and 17% in SME roles. The subcompetencies of learner assessment and feedback were prioritised highest (86%), while change management was prioritised lowest (23%). Respondents in SME roles compared to UME and GME roles or those in educational leadership ≥ 6 years compared to &lt; 6 years prioritised professionalism. Respondents without formal education training prioritised medical education scholarship more often than those with training. Surgical respondents more often prioritised administrative skills than nonsurgical respondents. Open-ended comments were generally positive towards a CET for housestaff, suggesting a hybrid format with flexible scheduling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Teaching-oriented subcompetencies were highly prioritised for a CET targeted at housestaff. The prioritisation choices offer guidance for a CE's progression through the subcompetencies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritising Competencies in Clinician Educator Training in Residency Programmes\",\"authors\":\"Bani M. Ratan,&nbsp;Nital P. Appelbaum,&nbsp;Peter J. Boedeker,&nbsp;Sara G. McNeil,&nbsp;Robert C. Hausmann,&nbsp;Teri L. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.13848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although Clinician Educator Tracks (CETs) have been developed for postgraduate trainees, more clarity is needed regarding which competencies are most relevant to resident and fellow physicians (housestaff) seeking to become Clinician Educators (CEs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used the Clinician Educator Milestones, an established framework for competencies at the faculty level, to perform a targeted needs assessment at a large academic institution from April–May 2023. Educational leaders in undergraduate (UME), graduate (GME) and senior medical education (SME) leadership roles were asked to prioritise the Clinician Educator Milestones subcompetencies for a 1-year track. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed; text comments underwent content analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 285 leaders, 118 (41%) completed the survey. The average length in educational leadership was 6.9 ± 5.6 years, with 33% having formal education training, 23% representing surgical specialities and 17% in SME roles. The subcompetencies of learner assessment and feedback were prioritised highest (86%), while change management was prioritised lowest (23%). Respondents in SME roles compared to UME and GME roles or those in educational leadership ≥ 6 years compared to &lt; 6 years prioritised professionalism. Respondents without formal education training prioritised medical education scholarship more often than those with training. Surgical respondents more often prioritised administrative skills than nonsurgical respondents. Open-ended comments were generally positive towards a CET for housestaff, suggesting a hybrid format with flexible scheduling.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Teaching-oriented subcompetencies were highly prioritised for a CET targeted at housestaff. The prioritisation choices offer guidance for a CE's progression through the subcompetencies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:虽然临床医生教育跟踪(cet)已经为研究生培训生开发,但需要更明确的是,哪些能力与寻求成为临床医生教育(ce)的住院医生和其他医生(家政人员)最相关。方法:我们使用临床医生教育里程碑,这是一个已建立的教师水平能力框架,于2023年4月至5月在一家大型学术机构进行了目标需求评估。要求本科(UME),研究生(GME)和高级医学教育(SME)领导角色的教育领导者在1年的跟踪中优先考虑临床医生教育者里程碑子能力。进行描述性统计和logistic回归分析;文本评论进行了内容分析。结果:285名领导中,有118人(41%)完成了调查。教育领导的平均年龄为6.9±5.6年,其中33%接受过正规教育培训,23%为外科专业,17%为中小企业。学习者评估和反馈的子胜任力优先级最高(86%),而变革管理优先级最低(23%)。中小企业角色的受访者优先考虑专业性,而非中等企业和中等企业角色,或教育领导≥6年的受访者优先考虑专业性,而非教育领导< 6年的受访者。未接受过正规教育培训的受访者比接受过培训的受访者更看重医学教育奖学金。手术应答者往往比非手术应答者更优先考虑管理技能。开放式评论普遍对家政人员的CET持积极态度,建议采用灵活调度的混合格式。结论:教学导向的次胜任力在针对家政人员的大学英语考试中被高度重视。优先级的选择为行政长官通过子胜任力的发展提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritising Competencies in Clinician Educator Training in Residency Programmes

Introduction

Although Clinician Educator Tracks (CETs) have been developed for postgraduate trainees, more clarity is needed regarding which competencies are most relevant to resident and fellow physicians (housestaff) seeking to become Clinician Educators (CEs).

Methods

We used the Clinician Educator Milestones, an established framework for competencies at the faculty level, to perform a targeted needs assessment at a large academic institution from April–May 2023. Educational leaders in undergraduate (UME), graduate (GME) and senior medical education (SME) leadership roles were asked to prioritise the Clinician Educator Milestones subcompetencies for a 1-year track. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed; text comments underwent content analysis.

Results

Of the 285 leaders, 118 (41%) completed the survey. The average length in educational leadership was 6.9 ± 5.6 years, with 33% having formal education training, 23% representing surgical specialities and 17% in SME roles. The subcompetencies of learner assessment and feedback were prioritised highest (86%), while change management was prioritised lowest (23%). Respondents in SME roles compared to UME and GME roles or those in educational leadership ≥ 6 years compared to < 6 years prioritised professionalism. Respondents without formal education training prioritised medical education scholarship more often than those with training. Surgical respondents more often prioritised administrative skills than nonsurgical respondents. Open-ended comments were generally positive towards a CET for housestaff, suggesting a hybrid format with flexible scheduling.

Conclusions

Teaching-oriented subcompetencies were highly prioritised for a CET targeted at housestaff. The prioritisation choices offer guidance for a CE's progression through the subcompetencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信