Jessica R. Newman, Michael Rouse, Gage Davies, Roshan Bisarya, Emma Nguyen, Jennifer Fink
{"title":"内科学生主任选修。","authors":"Jessica R. Newman, Michael Rouse, Gage Davies, Roshan Bisarya, Emma Nguyen, Jennifer Fink","doi":"10.1111/tct.13851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With increasing patient care responsibilities, administrative work and education demands, physicians may find it challenging to provide high-quality and engaging clinical education to third-year medical students on clerkships. Fourth-year students in the role of near-peer teachers can help fill this role, but they often also have competing responsibilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>A 4-week Internal Medicine Student Chief (Student Chief) elective was created, designed such that fourth-year students would apply for dedicated time to serve as student leaders, coaches and educators for the third-year students on the Internal Medicine clerkship. They were provided an asynchronous medical education curriculum and conducted their own Medicine subject exam reviews, case conferences and feedback sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Course evaluations by clerkship students did not detect a significant difference between the “quality” of the Internal Medicine clerkship and the “amount of formative feedback” from pre−post Student Chief elective introduction. Clerkship students' feedback regarding their interactions with and the ratings of the Student Chief, however, were excellent. Evaluations by the Student Chief suggested that the course provided rich opportunities for students interested in medical education to learn and practice skills in teaching, mentoring and coaching of Internal Medicine clerkship students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Given overwhelmingly positive feedback, the Student Chief elective has continued. Student Chief responsibilities evolved based on feedback, and the Student Chiefs themselves develop their own learning goals for their experience. Future studies could include a more longitudinal evaluation of the program, expanding the scope of the Student Chief experience to other specialties and publication of an implementation toolkit.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Medicine Student Chief Elective\",\"authors\":\"Jessica R. Newman, Michael Rouse, Gage Davies, Roshan Bisarya, Emma Nguyen, Jennifer Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.13851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>With increasing patient care responsibilities, administrative work and education demands, physicians may find it challenging to provide high-quality and engaging clinical education to third-year medical students on clerkships. Fourth-year students in the role of near-peer teachers can help fill this role, but they often also have competing responsibilities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>A 4-week Internal Medicine Student Chief (Student Chief) elective was created, designed such that fourth-year students would apply for dedicated time to serve as student leaders, coaches and educators for the third-year students on the Internal Medicine clerkship. They were provided an asynchronous medical education curriculum and conducted their own Medicine subject exam reviews, case conferences and feedback sessions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Course evaluations by clerkship students did not detect a significant difference between the “quality” of the Internal Medicine clerkship and the “amount of formative feedback” from pre−post Student Chief elective introduction. Clerkship students' feedback regarding their interactions with and the ratings of the Student Chief, however, were excellent. Evaluations by the Student Chief suggested that the course provided rich opportunities for students interested in medical education to learn and practice skills in teaching, mentoring and coaching of Internal Medicine clerkship students.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Given overwhelmingly positive feedback, the Student Chief elective has continued. Student Chief responsibilities evolved based on feedback, and the Student Chiefs themselves develop their own learning goals for their experience. Future studies could include a more longitudinal evaluation of the program, expanding the scope of the Student Chief experience to other specialties and publication of an implementation toolkit.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
With increasing patient care responsibilities, administrative work and education demands, physicians may find it challenging to provide high-quality and engaging clinical education to third-year medical students on clerkships. Fourth-year students in the role of near-peer teachers can help fill this role, but they often also have competing responsibilities.
Approach
A 4-week Internal Medicine Student Chief (Student Chief) elective was created, designed such that fourth-year students would apply for dedicated time to serve as student leaders, coaches and educators for the third-year students on the Internal Medicine clerkship. They were provided an asynchronous medical education curriculum and conducted their own Medicine subject exam reviews, case conferences and feedback sessions.
Evaluation
Course evaluations by clerkship students did not detect a significant difference between the “quality” of the Internal Medicine clerkship and the “amount of formative feedback” from pre−post Student Chief elective introduction. Clerkship students' feedback regarding their interactions with and the ratings of the Student Chief, however, were excellent. Evaluations by the Student Chief suggested that the course provided rich opportunities for students interested in medical education to learn and practice skills in teaching, mentoring and coaching of Internal Medicine clerkship students.
Implications
Given overwhelmingly positive feedback, the Student Chief elective has continued. Student Chief responsibilities evolved based on feedback, and the Student Chiefs themselves develop their own learning goals for their experience. Future studies could include a more longitudinal evaluation of the program, expanding the scope of the Student Chief experience to other specialties and publication of an implementation toolkit.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.