Santiago Castiello , Rosa Rossi-Goldthorpe , Siyan Fan , Joshua Kenney , James A. Waltz , Molly Erickson , Sonia Bansal , James M. Gold , Philip R. Corlett
{"title":"妄想性非现实性和预测性处理。","authors":"Santiago Castiello , Rosa Rossi-Goldthorpe , Siyan Fan , Joshua Kenney , James A. Waltz , Molly Erickson , Sonia Bansal , James M. Gold , Philip R. Corlett","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phenomenological psychopathologists have recently highlighted how people with delusions experience multiple realities (delusional and nondelusional) and have suggested that this double bookkeeping cannot be explained via predictive processing. Here, we present data from Kamin blocking and extinction learning that show how predictive processing might, in principle, explain a pervasive sense of dual reality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study involved 3 participant groups: patients with schizophrenia (SZ) (<em>n</em> = 42), healthy participants with elevated esoteric beliefs (EEBs) (clairaudient psychics) (<em>n</em> = 31), and healthy control participants (HCs) with neither illness nor significant delusional ideation (<em>n</em> = 62). We examined belief formation using a Kamin blocking causal learning task with extinction and delusions with the 40-item Peters Delusion Inventory, specifically the unreality item “Do things around you ever feel unreal, as though it was all part of an experiment?” as a proxy for unreality experiences and beliefs. A clinician also assessed symptoms with a structured clinical interview.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some people with SZ did not report a sense of unreality, and some people with elevated esoteric beliefs (but no psychotic illness) reported unreality experiences. No HCs reported them (despite reporting other delusion-like beliefs). Unreality experiences in clinical delusions and nonclinical delusion-like beliefs were associated with different types of aberrant prediction error processing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These data suggest how predictive processing may explain the sense of unreality. They indicate that different prediction error dysfunctions are associated with delusions with different contents. In this case, we have used predictive processing to address a salient issue raised by our phenomenological colleagues, namely the impact of psychosis on experiences of and beliefs about reality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"10 7","pages":"Pages 709-717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delusional Unreality and Predictive Processing\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Castiello , Rosa Rossi-Goldthorpe , Siyan Fan , Joshua Kenney , James A. Waltz , Molly Erickson , Sonia Bansal , James M. Gold , Philip R. Corlett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phenomenological psychopathologists have recently highlighted how people with delusions experience multiple realities (delusional and nondelusional) and have suggested that this double bookkeeping cannot be explained via predictive processing. Here, we present data from Kamin blocking and extinction learning that show how predictive processing might, in principle, explain a pervasive sense of dual reality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study involved 3 participant groups: patients with schizophrenia (SZ) (<em>n</em> = 42), healthy participants with elevated esoteric beliefs (EEBs) (clairaudient psychics) (<em>n</em> = 31), and healthy control participants (HCs) with neither illness nor significant delusional ideation (<em>n</em> = 62). We examined belief formation using a Kamin blocking causal learning task with extinction and delusions with the 40-item Peters Delusion Inventory, specifically the unreality item “Do things around you ever feel unreal, as though it was all part of an experiment?” as a proxy for unreality experiences and beliefs. A clinician also assessed symptoms with a structured clinical interview.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some people with SZ did not report a sense of unreality, and some people with elevated esoteric beliefs (but no psychotic illness) reported unreality experiences. No HCs reported them (despite reporting other delusion-like beliefs). Unreality experiences in clinical delusions and nonclinical delusion-like beliefs were associated with different types of aberrant prediction error processing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These data suggest how predictive processing may explain the sense of unreality. They indicate that different prediction error dysfunctions are associated with delusions with different contents. In this case, we have used predictive processing to address a salient issue raised by our phenomenological colleagues, namely the impact of psychosis on experiences of and beliefs about reality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 709-717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224003823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224003823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phenomenological psychopathologists have recently highlighted how people with delusions experience multiple realities (delusional and nondelusional) and have suggested that this double bookkeeping cannot be explained via predictive processing. Here, we present data from Kamin blocking and extinction learning that show how predictive processing might, in principle, explain a pervasive sense of dual reality.
Methods
This cross-sectional study involved 3 participant groups: patients with schizophrenia (SZ) (n = 42), healthy participants with elevated esoteric beliefs (EEBs) (clairaudient psychics) (n = 31), and healthy control participants (HCs) with neither illness nor significant delusional ideation (n = 62). We examined belief formation using a Kamin blocking causal learning task with extinction and delusions with the 40-item Peters Delusion Inventory, specifically the unreality item “Do things around you ever feel unreal, as though it was all part of an experiment?” as a proxy for unreality experiences and beliefs. A clinician also assessed symptoms with a structured clinical interview.
Results
Some people with SZ did not report a sense of unreality, and some people with elevated esoteric beliefs (but no psychotic illness) reported unreality experiences. No HCs reported them (despite reporting other delusion-like beliefs). Unreality experiences in clinical delusions and nonclinical delusion-like beliefs were associated with different types of aberrant prediction error processing.
Conclusions
These data suggest how predictive processing may explain the sense of unreality. They indicate that different prediction error dysfunctions are associated with delusions with different contents. In this case, we have used predictive processing to address a salient issue raised by our phenomenological colleagues, namely the impact of psychosis on experiences of and beliefs about reality.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.