变可靠性自动化中信任、依赖和依赖的校准。

Christopher Holland, Grace Perry, Heather F Neyedli
{"title":"变可靠性自动化中信任、依赖和依赖的校准。","authors":"Christopher Holland, Grace Perry, Heather F Neyedli","doi":"10.1177/10711813241277531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trust and system reliability can influence a user's dependence on automated systems. This study aimed to investigate how increases and decreases in automation reliability affect users' trust in these systems and how these changes in trust are associated with users' dependence on the system. Participants completed a color identification task with the help of an automated aid, where the reliability of this aid either increased from 50% to 100% or decreased from 100% to 50% as the task progressed, depending on which group the participants were assigned to. Participants' trust, self-confidence, and dependence on the system were measured throughout the experiment. There were no differences in trust between the two groups throughout the experiment; however, participants' dependence behavior did follow system reliability. These findings highlight that trust is not always correlated with system reliability, and that although trust can often influence dependence, it does not always determine it.</p>","PeriodicalId":74544,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","volume":"68 1","pages":"604-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibrating Trust, Reliance and Dependence in Variable-Reliability Automation.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Holland, Grace Perry, Heather F Neyedli\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711813241277531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Trust and system reliability can influence a user's dependence on automated systems. This study aimed to investigate how increases and decreases in automation reliability affect users' trust in these systems and how these changes in trust are associated with users' dependence on the system. Participants completed a color identification task with the help of an automated aid, where the reliability of this aid either increased from 50% to 100% or decreased from 100% to 50% as the task progressed, depending on which group the participants were assigned to. Participants' trust, self-confidence, and dependence on the system were measured throughout the experiment. There were no differences in trust between the two groups throughout the experiment; however, participants' dependence behavior did follow system reliability. These findings highlight that trust is not always correlated with system reliability, and that although trust can often influence dependence, it does not always determine it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"604-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241277531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241277531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信任和系统可靠性会影响用户对自动化系统的依赖。本研究旨在探讨自动化可靠性的增加和减少如何影响用户对这些系统的信任,以及这些信任的变化如何与用户对系统的依赖相关。参与者在自动辅助工具的帮助下完成了一项颜色识别任务,随着任务的进行,这种辅助工具的可靠性要么从50%增加到100%,要么从100%降低到50%,这取决于参与者被分配到哪个组。在整个实验过程中,测量了参与者对系统的信任、自信和依赖。在整个实验过程中,两组之间的信任没有差异;然而,参与者的依赖行为确实遵循系统可靠性。这些发现突出表明,信任并不总是与系统可靠性相关,尽管信任经常会影响依赖性,但它并不总是决定依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calibrating Trust, Reliance and Dependence in Variable-Reliability Automation.

Trust and system reliability can influence a user's dependence on automated systems. This study aimed to investigate how increases and decreases in automation reliability affect users' trust in these systems and how these changes in trust are associated with users' dependence on the system. Participants completed a color identification task with the help of an automated aid, where the reliability of this aid either increased from 50% to 100% or decreased from 100% to 50% as the task progressed, depending on which group the participants were assigned to. Participants' trust, self-confidence, and dependence on the system were measured throughout the experiment. There were no differences in trust between the two groups throughout the experiment; however, participants' dependence behavior did follow system reliability. These findings highlight that trust is not always correlated with system reliability, and that although trust can often influence dependence, it does not always determine it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信