热消融技术治疗原发性低危甲状腺乳头状癌的疗效和肿瘤预后:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Van Cuong Nguyen, Jeong Seon Park, Chang Myeon Song, Yong Bae Ji, Jin Hyeok Jeong, Kyung Tae
{"title":"热消融技术治疗原发性低危甲状腺乳头状癌的疗效和肿瘤预后:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Van Cuong Nguyen, Jeong Seon Park, Chang Myeon Song, Yong Bae Ji, Jin Hyeok Jeong, Kyung Tae","doi":"10.1002/hed.28029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques, including radiofrequency, laser, and microwave ablation, in treating primary thyroid cancer compared with surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, which included 21 comparative studies and 40 noncomparative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three thermal ablation techniques showed significant superiority over surgical resection in terms of operative time, pain, cost, quality of life, and complications. Three years after the procedure, the tumor volume reduction and complete disappearance rates for the three thermal ablation techniques were similar, at approximately 99% and 93%-95%, respectively. The recurrence rate remained comparable (approximately 2%-3%) among the three thermal ablation techniques and surgical resection during a follow-up period exceeding 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques may be acceptable and comparable to surgical resection for selected cases of primary thyroid cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":"759-775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Oncologic Outcomes of Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Primary Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Van Cuong Nguyen, Jeong Seon Park, Chang Myeon Song, Yong Bae Ji, Jin Hyeok Jeong, Kyung Tae\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.28029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques, including radiofrequency, laser, and microwave ablation, in treating primary thyroid cancer compared with surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, which included 21 comparative studies and 40 noncomparative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three thermal ablation techniques showed significant superiority over surgical resection in terms of operative time, pain, cost, quality of life, and complications. Three years after the procedure, the tumor volume reduction and complete disappearance rates for the three thermal ablation techniques were similar, at approximately 99% and 93%-95%, respectively. The recurrence rate remained comparable (approximately 2%-3%) among the three thermal ablation techniques and surgical resection during a follow-up period exceeding 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques may be acceptable and comparable to surgical resection for selected cases of primary thyroid cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"759-775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估热消融技术(包括射频、激光和微波消融)治疗原发性甲状腺癌的安全性、有效性和肿瘤学结果,并与手术切除进行比较。方法:我们进行了系统综述和网络荟萃分析,包括21项比较研究和40项非比较研究。结果:三种热消融技术在手术时间、疼痛、费用、生活质量和并发症方面均明显优于手术切除。手术三年后,三种热消融技术的肿瘤体积缩小率和完全消失率相似,分别约为99%和93%-95%。在超过3年的随访期间,三种热消融技术和手术切除的复发率保持相当(约2%-3%)。结论:对于选定的原发性甲状腺癌病例,热消融技术的安全性、有效性和肿瘤学结果是可以接受的,并可与手术切除相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Oncologic Outcomes of Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Primary Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques, including radiofrequency, laser, and microwave ablation, in treating primary thyroid cancer compared with surgical resection.

Method: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, which included 21 comparative studies and 40 noncomparative studies.

Results: The three thermal ablation techniques showed significant superiority over surgical resection in terms of operative time, pain, cost, quality of life, and complications. Three years after the procedure, the tumor volume reduction and complete disappearance rates for the three thermal ablation techniques were similar, at approximately 99% and 93%-95%, respectively. The recurrence rate remained comparable (approximately 2%-3%) among the three thermal ablation techniques and surgical resection during a follow-up period exceeding 3 years.

Conclusions: The safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of thermal ablation techniques may be acceptable and comparable to surgical resection for selected cases of primary thyroid cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信