互联网作为针灸止痛的公共卫生信息来源:可信度评估和可读性分析。

IF 0.8 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1089/acu.2023.0136
Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, Hassan Ebrahimpour Sadagheyani, Amirreza Kalantari, Hossein Motahari-Nezhad, Zeinab Kohzadi
{"title":"互联网作为针灸止痛的公共卫生信息来源:可信度评估和可读性分析。","authors":"Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, Hassan Ebrahimpour Sadagheyani, Amirreza Kalantari, Hossein Motahari-Nezhad, Zeinab Kohzadi","doi":"10.1089/acu.2023.0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the number of patients seeking information from online health websites. As the information available on these websites can significantly impact the overall health of individuals in a society, it is vital for online health information to be presented in a manner that is readable and credible to the general public. To address this concern, the objective of the study was to examine and assess the credibility and readability of websites about acupuncture as a pain management approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research population was represented by websites containing information about pain management using acupuncture found through Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines and with the keywords acupuncture and pain. The websites were evaluated in terms of confirming HON and JAMA criteria. FRE, GFI, FKGL, CLI, SMOG, and ARI indexes were used to assess their readability, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated 52 websites that appeared on the first three pages of search engine results. Out of the 52 websites analyzed, 40 websites (76.9%) met the validity criteria set by JAMA, while only 21 websites (40.4%) were deemed valid based on the HONcode standards. According to the average readability index (12.38), the contents presented on the websites were at the Difficult to Read level. The mean readability scores of websites across various domains exhibit no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of websites that provide acupuncture-related information do meet the verification set by HONcode. Additionally, the scientific and educational content on these websites tends to be more complex than what is recommended by the AMA and NIH. This is concerning given the increasing popularity of online content and the impact it has on public health. Providers of this information must prioritize making it readable to a wide audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"36 6","pages":"350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet as a Source of Public Health Information on Acupuncture for Pain Relief: Credibility Assessment and Readability Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, Hassan Ebrahimpour Sadagheyani, Amirreza Kalantari, Hossein Motahari-Nezhad, Zeinab Kohzadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acu.2023.0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the number of patients seeking information from online health websites. As the information available on these websites can significantly impact the overall health of individuals in a society, it is vital for online health information to be presented in a manner that is readable and credible to the general public. To address this concern, the objective of the study was to examine and assess the credibility and readability of websites about acupuncture as a pain management approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research population was represented by websites containing information about pain management using acupuncture found through Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines and with the keywords acupuncture and pain. The websites were evaluated in terms of confirming HON and JAMA criteria. FRE, GFI, FKGL, CLI, SMOG, and ARI indexes were used to assess their readability, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated 52 websites that appeared on the first three pages of search engine results. Out of the 52 websites analyzed, 40 websites (76.9%) met the validity criteria set by JAMA, while only 21 websites (40.4%) were deemed valid based on the HONcode standards. According to the average readability index (12.38), the contents presented on the websites were at the Difficult to Read level. The mean readability scores of websites across various domains exhibit no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of websites that provide acupuncture-related information do meet the verification set by HONcode. Additionally, the scientific and educational content on these websites tends to be more complex than what is recommended by the AMA and NIH. This is concerning given the increasing popularity of online content and the impact it has on public health. Providers of this information must prioritize making it readable to a wide audience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"350-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2023.0136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2023.0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,从在线健康网站寻求信息的患者数量显著增加。由于这些网站上提供的信息可以对社会中个人的整体健康产生重大影响,因此以公众可读和可信的方式提供在线健康信息至关重要。为了解决这一问题,本研究的目的是检查和评估关于针灸作为疼痛管理方法的网站的可信度和可读性。方法:通过谷歌、雅虎和必应搜索引擎,以“针灸和疼痛”为关键词,找到包含针灸疼痛管理信息的网站作为研究人群的代表。根据确认HON和JAMA标准对网站进行评估。采用FRE、GFI、FKGL、CLI、SMOG和ARI指数评价其可读性,采用Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较数据。结果:本研究评估了出现在搜索引擎结果前三页的52个网站。在分析的52个网站中,40个网站(76.9%)符合JAMA设定的有效性标准,而根据HONcode标准,只有21个网站(40.4%)被认为是有效的。根据平均可读性指数(12.38),网站呈现的内容处于难以阅读的水平。各域名网站的平均可读性得分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:大多数提供针灸相关信息的网站都满足HONcode的验证要求。此外,这些网站上的科学和教育内容往往比美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院推荐的内容更复杂。鉴于在线内容日益普及及其对公共卫生的影响,这令人担忧。这些信息的提供者必须优先考虑使其具有广泛的可读性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internet as a Source of Public Health Information on Acupuncture for Pain Relief: Credibility Assessment and Readability Analysis.

Background: In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the number of patients seeking information from online health websites. As the information available on these websites can significantly impact the overall health of individuals in a society, it is vital for online health information to be presented in a manner that is readable and credible to the general public. To address this concern, the objective of the study was to examine and assess the credibility and readability of websites about acupuncture as a pain management approach.

Methods: The research population was represented by websites containing information about pain management using acupuncture found through Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines and with the keywords acupuncture and pain. The websites were evaluated in terms of confirming HON and JAMA criteria. FRE, GFI, FKGL, CLI, SMOG, and ARI indexes were used to assess their readability, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the data.

Results: This study evaluated 52 websites that appeared on the first three pages of search engine results. Out of the 52 websites analyzed, 40 websites (76.9%) met the validity criteria set by JAMA, while only 21 websites (40.4%) were deemed valid based on the HONcode standards. According to the average readability index (12.38), the contents presented on the websites were at the Difficult to Read level. The mean readability scores of websites across various domains exhibit no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The majority of websites that provide acupuncture-related information do meet the verification set by HONcode. Additionally, the scientific and educational content on these websites tends to be more complex than what is recommended by the AMA and NIH. This is concerning given the increasing popularity of online content and the impact it has on public health. Providers of this information must prioritize making it readable to a wide audience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信