慢传输型便秘的手术治疗:全结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术。

Q3 Medicine
M Guo, W D Tong
{"title":"慢传输型便秘的手术治疗:全结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术。","authors":"M Guo, W D Tong","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241114-00372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the surgical treatment of slow transit constipation (STC) has been around for over a century, the choice of surgical method is still controversial. Specifically, the two most widely used operations in the world are total colectomy ileorectostomy (TC-IRA) and subtotal colectomy. Subtotal colectomy offers many methods for anastomosis, including ileocecal and cecorectal anastomoses and so on. Cecorectal anastomosis can be divided into two types: isoperistaltic anastomosis and antiperistaltic anastomosis. It is generally believed that total colectomy provides definitive effects but results in more severe postoperative diarrhea, while subtotal colectomy may reduce postoperative diarrhea but potentially increase the risk of constipation recurrence. Most studies of these surgical methods are retrospective small-sample studies with low-quality evidence. This is also one of the reasons for the lack of STC gold standard surgery in clinical practice. This paper discusses the selection of surgical methods for intractable slow transit constipation (STC) based on a review of literature published within the past 10 years, as well as our team's extensive 33-year experience in diagnosing and treating constipation surgically.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 12","pages":"1248-1253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical treatment for slow transit constipation: total colectomy and subtotal colectomy].\",\"authors\":\"M Guo, W D Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241114-00372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the surgical treatment of slow transit constipation (STC) has been around for over a century, the choice of surgical method is still controversial. Specifically, the two most widely used operations in the world are total colectomy ileorectostomy (TC-IRA) and subtotal colectomy. Subtotal colectomy offers many methods for anastomosis, including ileocecal and cecorectal anastomoses and so on. Cecorectal anastomosis can be divided into two types: isoperistaltic anastomosis and antiperistaltic anastomosis. It is generally believed that total colectomy provides definitive effects but results in more severe postoperative diarrhea, while subtotal colectomy may reduce postoperative diarrhea but potentially increase the risk of constipation recurrence. Most studies of these surgical methods are retrospective small-sample studies with low-quality evidence. This is also one of the reasons for the lack of STC gold standard surgery in clinical practice. This paper discusses the selection of surgical methods for intractable slow transit constipation (STC) based on a review of literature published within the past 10 years, as well as our team's extensive 33-year experience in diagnosing and treating constipation surgically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"1248-1253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241114-00372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241114-00372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢传输型便秘(STC)的手术治疗已有一个多世纪的历史,但手术方法的选择仍存在争议。具体来说,世界上使用最广泛的两种手术是全结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术。结肠次全切除术提供了多种吻合方式,包括回盲吻合术和结肠直肠吻合术等。结肠直肠吻合术可分为等蠕动吻合术和反蠕动吻合术两种。一般认为,全结肠切除术疗效确切,但术后腹泻更严重,而次全结肠切除术可减少术后腹泻,但可能增加便秘复发的风险。这些手术方法的大多数研究是回顾性的小样本研究,证据质量低。这也是临床上缺乏STC金标准手术的原因之一。本文在回顾近10年来发表的文献的基础上,结合我们团队33年来在便秘的外科诊断和治疗方面的丰富经验,讨论顽固性慢传输型便秘(STC)手术方法的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Surgical treatment for slow transit constipation: total colectomy and subtotal colectomy].

Although the surgical treatment of slow transit constipation (STC) has been around for over a century, the choice of surgical method is still controversial. Specifically, the two most widely used operations in the world are total colectomy ileorectostomy (TC-IRA) and subtotal colectomy. Subtotal colectomy offers many methods for anastomosis, including ileocecal and cecorectal anastomoses and so on. Cecorectal anastomosis can be divided into two types: isoperistaltic anastomosis and antiperistaltic anastomosis. It is generally believed that total colectomy provides definitive effects but results in more severe postoperative diarrhea, while subtotal colectomy may reduce postoperative diarrhea but potentially increase the risk of constipation recurrence. Most studies of these surgical methods are retrospective small-sample studies with low-quality evidence. This is also one of the reasons for the lack of STC gold standard surgery in clinical practice. This paper discusses the selection of surgical methods for intractable slow transit constipation (STC) based on a review of literature published within the past 10 years, as well as our team's extensive 33-year experience in diagnosing and treating constipation surgically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信