探讨妇女在引产计划中的决策:一种多方法设计。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jasmine Sistanis, Maryann Street, Patricia Nicholson
{"title":"探讨妇女在引产计划中的决策:一种多方法设计。","authors":"Jasmine Sistanis, Maryann Street, Patricia Nicholson","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore women's preferences and experiences of degree of control in decision making when planning an induction of labor (IOL). This multi-method study was conducted using semi-structured individual interviews and the completion of two Control Preferences Scales by eight postnatal women from a metropolitan health service in Melbourne, Australia. Four themes were generated from the interview data: \"shared decision making\"; \"changing expectations\"; \"IOL experience\"; and \"informed consent.\" Women's expectations of, and preferences for, an IOL changed during pregnancy and were influenced by their perception of risk to the fetus, indication for the procedure, and trust in clinicians. Information that was personalized to the woman to include practical aspects, risks, and alternative options was rarely provided. Overall, women reported that they did not experience the degree of control they preferred when planning an IOL. Clinician understanding of decision making preferences of women when planning an IOL can assist with care that is individualized and aligned to women's values, which is crucial to improving the quality of care provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"26 4","pages":"e70016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Decision Making of Women When Planning an Induction of Labor: A Multi-Method Design.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Sistanis, Maryann Street, Patricia Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nhs.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore women's preferences and experiences of degree of control in decision making when planning an induction of labor (IOL). This multi-method study was conducted using semi-structured individual interviews and the completion of two Control Preferences Scales by eight postnatal women from a metropolitan health service in Melbourne, Australia. Four themes were generated from the interview data: \\\"shared decision making\\\"; \\\"changing expectations\\\"; \\\"IOL experience\\\"; and \\\"informed consent.\\\" Women's expectations of, and preferences for, an IOL changed during pregnancy and were influenced by their perception of risk to the fetus, indication for the procedure, and trust in clinicians. Information that was personalized to the woman to include practical aspects, risks, and alternative options was rarely provided. Overall, women reported that they did not experience the degree of control they preferred when planning an IOL. Clinician understanding of decision making preferences of women when planning an IOL can assist with care that is individualized and aligned to women's values, which is crucial to improving the quality of care provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"e70016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨妇女的偏好和经验控制程度的决策时,计划引产(IOL)。这项多方法研究采用半结构化的个人访谈和完成两个控制偏好量表,由来自澳大利亚墨尔本都市卫生服务机构的8名产后妇女进行。从访谈数据中产生了四个主题:“共同决策”;“改变预期”;“人工经验”;以及“知情同意”。妇女对人工晶状体的期望和偏好在怀孕期间发生了变化,并受到她们对胎儿风险的感知、手术指征和对临床医生的信任的影响。针对女性的个性化信息,包括实际方面、风险和替代方案,很少被提供。总的来说,妇女报告说,她们在计划人工晶状体时没有达到她们所希望的控制程度。临床医生了解妇女在计划人工晶体时的决策偏好,有助于个性化护理,并与妇女的价值观保持一致,这对提高所提供的护理质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Decision Making of Women When Planning an Induction of Labor: A Multi-Method Design.

The aim of this study was to explore women's preferences and experiences of degree of control in decision making when planning an induction of labor (IOL). This multi-method study was conducted using semi-structured individual interviews and the completion of two Control Preferences Scales by eight postnatal women from a metropolitan health service in Melbourne, Australia. Four themes were generated from the interview data: "shared decision making"; "changing expectations"; "IOL experience"; and "informed consent." Women's expectations of, and preferences for, an IOL changed during pregnancy and were influenced by their perception of risk to the fetus, indication for the procedure, and trust in clinicians. Information that was personalized to the woman to include practical aspects, risks, and alternative options was rarely provided. Overall, women reported that they did not experience the degree of control they preferred when planning an IOL. Clinician understanding of decision making preferences of women when planning an IOL can assist with care that is individualized and aligned to women's values, which is crucial to improving the quality of care provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信