用定性和定量标准对失眠症状进行睡眠生理学的比较分析。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae301
Ruda Lee, Olivia Larson, Sammy Dhaliwal, Kibum Moon, Bethany Gerardy, Philip de Chazal, Peter A Cistulli, Ning-Hung Chen, Fang Han, Qing Yun Li, Greg Maislin, Nigel McArdle, Thomas Penzel, Richard J Schwab, Sergio Tufik, Ulysses J Magalang, Bhajan Singh, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack, Brendan T Keenan, Magdy Younes, Philip Gehrman
{"title":"用定性和定量标准对失眠症状进行睡眠生理学的比较分析。","authors":"Ruda Lee, Olivia Larson, Sammy Dhaliwal, Kibum Moon, Bethany Gerardy, Philip de Chazal, Peter A Cistulli, Ning-Hung Chen, Fang Han, Qing Yun Li, Greg Maislin, Nigel McArdle, Thomas Penzel, Richard J Schwab, Sergio Tufik, Ulysses J Magalang, Bhajan Singh, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack, Brendan T Keenan, Magdy Younes, Philip Gehrman","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of research, defining insomnia remains challenging due to its complex and variable nature. Various diagnostic systems emphasize the chronic nature of insomnia and its impact on daily functioning, relying heavily on patient self-reporting due to limitations in objective measures such as polysomnography (PSG). Discrepancies between subjective experiences and objective PSG results highlight the need for more nuanced approaches, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral analysis, which reveals distinct patterns of high-frequency activity in individuals with insomnia. This study explores EEG markers of insomnia by integrating subjective reports with objective physiological markers, specifically ORP (Odds-Ratio-Product) and spectral features, to address inconsistencies found in previous research and clinical settings. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of insomnia are contrasted to highlight differences in sleep architecture and EEG characteristics. The research aims to determine whether groups defined by weekly frequency and daily duration of symptoms have different distribution patterns and which physiological characteristics best distinguish insomnia patients from controls. Our findings suggest that ORP, as a dependent variable, captures the most significant differences in the independent variables across the model. Elevated beta power in insomnia patients indicates increased cortical arousal, supporting the perspective of insomnia as a hyperarousal disorder. Future research should focus on using ORP to enhance the understanding of sleep disturbances in insomnia. Comprehensive evaluation of insomnia requires integrating qualitative, quantitative, and neurophysiological data to fully understand its impact on sleep architecture and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of sleep physiology using qualitative and quantitative criteria for insomnia symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Ruda Lee, Olivia Larson, Sammy Dhaliwal, Kibum Moon, Bethany Gerardy, Philip de Chazal, Peter A Cistulli, Ning-Hung Chen, Fang Han, Qing Yun Li, Greg Maislin, Nigel McArdle, Thomas Penzel, Richard J Schwab, Sergio Tufik, Ulysses J Magalang, Bhajan Singh, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack, Brendan T Keenan, Magdy Younes, Philip Gehrman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleep/zsae301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite decades of research, defining insomnia remains challenging due to its complex and variable nature. Various diagnostic systems emphasize the chronic nature of insomnia and its impact on daily functioning, relying heavily on patient self-reporting due to limitations in objective measures such as polysomnography (PSG). Discrepancies between subjective experiences and objective PSG results highlight the need for more nuanced approaches, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral analysis, which reveals distinct patterns of high-frequency activity in individuals with insomnia. This study explores EEG markers of insomnia by integrating subjective reports with objective physiological markers, specifically ORP (Odds-Ratio-Product) and spectral features, to address inconsistencies found in previous research and clinical settings. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of insomnia are contrasted to highlight differences in sleep architecture and EEG characteristics. The research aims to determine whether groups defined by weekly frequency and daily duration of symptoms have different distribution patterns and which physiological characteristics best distinguish insomnia patients from controls. Our findings suggest that ORP, as a dependent variable, captures the most significant differences in the independent variables across the model. Elevated beta power in insomnia patients indicates increased cortical arousal, supporting the perspective of insomnia as a hyperarousal disorder. Future research should focus on using ORP to enhance the understanding of sleep disturbances in insomnia. Comprehensive evaluation of insomnia requires integrating qualitative, quantitative, and neurophysiological data to fully understand its impact on sleep architecture and quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae301\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管经过了几十年的研究,但由于失眠的复杂性和多变性,它的定义仍然具有挑战性。各种诊断系统都强调失眠的慢性本质及其对日常功能的影响,由于多导睡眠图(PSG)等客观测量方法的局限性,这些系统在很大程度上依赖于患者的自我报告。主观体验和客观PSG结果之间的差异强调需要更细致的方法,如脑电图(EEG)频谱分析,它揭示了失眠症患者高频活动的独特模式。本研究通过结合主观报告和客观生理标记,特别是ORP(比值比积)和频谱特征,探索失眠的脑电图标记,以解决先前研究和临床环境中发现的不一致。对失眠的定性和定量定义进行对比,以突出睡眠结构和脑电图特征的差异。该研究旨在确定以每周出现频率和每日症状持续时间定义的组是否有不同的分布模式,以及哪种生理特征最能将失眠患者与对照组区分开来。我们的研究结果表明,ORP作为一个因变量,捕获了整个模型中自变量中最显著的差异。失眠患者的β能量升高表明皮质觉醒增加,支持失眠是一种高觉醒障碍的观点。未来的研究应侧重于利用ORP来加强对失眠患者睡眠障碍的理解。全面评估失眠需要综合定性、定量和神经生理学数据,以充分了解其对睡眠结构和质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of sleep physiology using qualitative and quantitative criteria for insomnia symptoms.

Despite decades of research, defining insomnia remains challenging due to its complex and variable nature. Various diagnostic systems emphasize the chronic nature of insomnia and its impact on daily functioning, relying heavily on patient self-reporting due to limitations in objective measures such as polysomnography (PSG). Discrepancies between subjective experiences and objective PSG results highlight the need for more nuanced approaches, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral analysis, which reveals distinct patterns of high-frequency activity in individuals with insomnia. This study explores EEG markers of insomnia by integrating subjective reports with objective physiological markers, specifically ORP (Odds-Ratio-Product) and spectral features, to address inconsistencies found in previous research and clinical settings. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of insomnia are contrasted to highlight differences in sleep architecture and EEG characteristics. The research aims to determine whether groups defined by weekly frequency and daily duration of symptoms have different distribution patterns and which physiological characteristics best distinguish insomnia patients from controls. Our findings suggest that ORP, as a dependent variable, captures the most significant differences in the independent variables across the model. Elevated beta power in insomnia patients indicates increased cortical arousal, supporting the perspective of insomnia as a hyperarousal disorder. Future research should focus on using ORP to enhance the understanding of sleep disturbances in insomnia. Comprehensive evaluation of insomnia requires integrating qualitative, quantitative, and neurophysiological data to fully understand its impact on sleep architecture and quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信