2012-2018年生物制剂有效性和安全性倡议EHR网络中血小板使用模式的评估

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/trf.18114
Carlos H Villa, Paul Biondich, Nicole L Draper, Graça M Dores, Emily Storch, Kinnera Chada, Hui-Lee Wong, Barbee Whitaker, Joyce Obidi, Sarah Vossoughi, Andrey Soares, Lisa M Schilling, Karthik Natarajan, Michael Goodman, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Rachel Zucker, Thomas Falconer, Nerissa Williams, Christian Reich, Steven Anderson, Azadeh Shoaibi
{"title":"2012-2018年生物制剂有效性和安全性倡议EHR网络中血小板使用模式的评估","authors":"Carlos H Villa, Paul Biondich, Nicole L Draper, Graça M Dores, Emily Storch, Kinnera Chada, Hui-Lee Wong, Barbee Whitaker, Joyce Obidi, Sarah Vossoughi, Andrey Soares, Lisa M Schilling, Karthik Natarajan, Michael Goodman, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Rachel Zucker, Thomas Falconer, Nerissa Williams, Christian Reich, Steven Anderson, Azadeh Shoaibi","doi":"10.1111/trf.18114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>U.S. FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) Initiative leverages large electronic health records and administrative claims data to conduct active surveillance for CBER-regulated products. Improved hemovigilance of platelet transfusions provides exposure data for future outcome studies and can identify opportunities to improve management of the limited platelet supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Platelet utilization in three hospital networks (2012-2018) is summarized from data obtained using Information Standard for Blood and Transplant (ISBT) 128 platelet codes. Transfusion episodes, the number of units transfused, and component characteristics are described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most platelet-transfused patients (range 59.6%-62.2% across study years for all sites) received platelets once per year and used a small proportion of the total platelets transfused per year (range 18.4%-22.5%). In contrast, a minority of patients were transfused 12 or more times in a given study year (range 4.4%-6.3%) and used a plurality of transfused platelets (range 32.2%-44.4%) per year. The overall ratio of platelets transfused to the number of patients receiving any platelet transfusion was stable over the study period (range 3.9-4.5 platelets/patient) and similar among participating data sources. For all data sources, most transfusion episodes (78%) involved one component per transfusion episode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ISBT 128 coding in the BEST Initiative was used to capture platelet transfusion events, component modifications, and characterize aspects of platelet use patterns. These data can be leveraged to identify opportunities for improved management of the platelet supply and provide granular exposure information for future studies of transfusion-related adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of platelet use evaluated in EHR networks of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, 2012-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos H Villa, Paul Biondich, Nicole L Draper, Graça M Dores, Emily Storch, Kinnera Chada, Hui-Lee Wong, Barbee Whitaker, Joyce Obidi, Sarah Vossoughi, Andrey Soares, Lisa M Schilling, Karthik Natarajan, Michael Goodman, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Rachel Zucker, Thomas Falconer, Nerissa Williams, Christian Reich, Steven Anderson, Azadeh Shoaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>U.S. FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) Initiative leverages large electronic health records and administrative claims data to conduct active surveillance for CBER-regulated products. Improved hemovigilance of platelet transfusions provides exposure data for future outcome studies and can identify opportunities to improve management of the limited platelet supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Platelet utilization in three hospital networks (2012-2018) is summarized from data obtained using Information Standard for Blood and Transplant (ISBT) 128 platelet codes. Transfusion episodes, the number of units transfused, and component characteristics are described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most platelet-transfused patients (range 59.6%-62.2% across study years for all sites) received platelets once per year and used a small proportion of the total platelets transfused per year (range 18.4%-22.5%). In contrast, a minority of patients were transfused 12 or more times in a given study year (range 4.4%-6.3%) and used a plurality of transfused platelets (range 32.2%-44.4%) per year. The overall ratio of platelets transfused to the number of patients receiving any platelet transfusion was stable over the study period (range 3.9-4.5 platelets/patient) and similar among participating data sources. For all data sources, most transfusion episodes (78%) involved one component per transfusion episode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ISBT 128 coding in the BEST Initiative was used to capture platelet transfusion events, component modifications, and characterize aspects of platelet use patterns. These data can be leveraged to identify opportunities for improved management of the platelet supply and provide granular exposure information for future studies of transfusion-related adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国FDA生物制品评估和研究中心(CBER)生物制品有效性和安全性(BEST)倡议利用大量电子健康记录和行政索赔数据对CBER监管产品进行主动监测。提高血小板输注的血液警惕性为未来的结果研究提供了暴露数据,并可以确定改善有限血小板供应管理的机会。方法:根据血液与移植信息标准(ISBT) 128个血小板编码获取的数据,总结3家医院网络2012-2018年血小板利用情况。输血次数,输血单位的数量,和组成特征进行了描述。结果:大多数输血小板的患者(在所有地点的研究年间范围为59.6%-62.2%)每年接受一次血小板,并且每年使用的血小板占总输血小板的一小部分(范围为18.4%-22.5%)。相比之下,少数患者在给定的研究年内输血12次或以上(范围4.4%-6.3%),并且每年使用多次输血血小板(范围32.2%-44.4%)。在研究期间,输注血小板与接受任何血小板输注的患者数量的总体比例是稳定的(范围为3.9-4.5个血小板/患者),参与数据来源之间也相似。对于所有数据来源,大多数输血事件(78%)涉及每次输血事件的一个成分。结论:BEST Initiative中的ISBT 128编码可用于捕获血小板输血事件、成分修饰和血小板使用模式的特征。这些数据可以用来确定改善血小板供应管理的机会,并为未来输血相关不良事件的研究提供颗粒暴露信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of platelet use evaluated in EHR networks of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, 2012-2018.

Background: U.S. FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) Initiative leverages large electronic health records and administrative claims data to conduct active surveillance for CBER-regulated products. Improved hemovigilance of platelet transfusions provides exposure data for future outcome studies and can identify opportunities to improve management of the limited platelet supply.

Methods: Platelet utilization in three hospital networks (2012-2018) is summarized from data obtained using Information Standard for Blood and Transplant (ISBT) 128 platelet codes. Transfusion episodes, the number of units transfused, and component characteristics are described.

Results: Most platelet-transfused patients (range 59.6%-62.2% across study years for all sites) received platelets once per year and used a small proportion of the total platelets transfused per year (range 18.4%-22.5%). In contrast, a minority of patients were transfused 12 or more times in a given study year (range 4.4%-6.3%) and used a plurality of transfused platelets (range 32.2%-44.4%) per year. The overall ratio of platelets transfused to the number of patients receiving any platelet transfusion was stable over the study period (range 3.9-4.5 platelets/patient) and similar among participating data sources. For all data sources, most transfusion episodes (78%) involved one component per transfusion episode.

Conclusion: ISBT 128 coding in the BEST Initiative was used to capture platelet transfusion events, component modifications, and characterize aspects of platelet use patterns. These data can be leveraged to identify opportunities for improved management of the platelet supply and provide granular exposure information for future studies of transfusion-related adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信