苏格兰筛查检测息肉癌研究(SSPoCS)算法在多中心队列治疗恶性结直肠息肉中的适用性

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
André Ruge Gonçalves, Maria Azevedo Silva, Cristiana Sequeira, André Mascarenhas, Mara Costa, Teresa Pinto Pais, Pedro Barreiro, Nuno Almeida, Nuno Rama, Alexandra Fernandes, Liliana Eliseu, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Helena Vasconcelos
{"title":"苏格兰筛查检测息肉癌研究(SSPoCS)算法在多中心队列治疗恶性结直肠息肉中的适用性","authors":"André Ruge Gonçalves, Maria Azevedo Silva, Cristiana Sequeira, André Mascarenhas, Mara Costa, Teresa Pinto Pais, Pedro Barreiro, Nuno Almeida, Nuno Rama, Alexandra Fernandes, Liliana Eliseu, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Helena Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2445699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Robust evidence regarding the management after endoscopic resection of malignant colorectal polyps (MCP) is lacking. Inconsistencies in reporting on potential prognostic factors hinder the decision process. To address these issues, the Scottish Screen-detected Polyp Cancer Study (SSPoCS) introduced an algorithm based in two easily obtainable variables: resection margin and lymphovascular invasion. This study aims to assess the applicability of the SSPoCS algorithm in a Portuguese multicentric cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Endoscopically resected MCP in five centers were included. The main outcome was residual/recurrent malignancy (RRM), defined as any of the following: (1) residual intramural or lymph node malignancy in the surgical specimen after completion surgery; (2) local or systemic recurrent disease in conservatively managed patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and eleven patients were included (mean age: 68.6 ± 10.4 years; male participants: 65.4%); 121 underwent completion surgery while 90 remained in surveillance. Thirty-two patients (15.2%) experienced RRM: 27 displayed residual malignancy in the surgical specimen and five developed recurrent disease. According to the SSPoCS algorithm: 120 patients were classified as having low-risk of residual disease, six of whom displayed RRM (5.0%); 10 as medium-risk, with one having RRM (10.0%); and 81 as high-risk, 25 of whom experienced RRM (30.9%). Lesions classified as low risk showed a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0% to exclude RRM. The algorithm demonstrated good accuracy in predicting RRM in a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65-0.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSPoCS algorithm revealed good accuracy in predicting residual/recurrent malignancy with a NPV of 95.0% to exclude RRM in low-risk lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of the Scottish screen-detected polyp cancer study (SSPoCS) algorithm in a multicentric cohort in the management of malignant colorectal polyps.\",\"authors\":\"André Ruge Gonçalves, Maria Azevedo Silva, Cristiana Sequeira, André Mascarenhas, Mara Costa, Teresa Pinto Pais, Pedro Barreiro, Nuno Almeida, Nuno Rama, Alexandra Fernandes, Liliana Eliseu, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Helena Vasconcelos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2024.2445699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Robust evidence regarding the management after endoscopic resection of malignant colorectal polyps (MCP) is lacking. Inconsistencies in reporting on potential prognostic factors hinder the decision process. To address these issues, the Scottish Screen-detected Polyp Cancer Study (SSPoCS) introduced an algorithm based in two easily obtainable variables: resection margin and lymphovascular invasion. This study aims to assess the applicability of the SSPoCS algorithm in a Portuguese multicentric cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Endoscopically resected MCP in five centers were included. The main outcome was residual/recurrent malignancy (RRM), defined as any of the following: (1) residual intramural or lymph node malignancy in the surgical specimen after completion surgery; (2) local or systemic recurrent disease in conservatively managed patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and eleven patients were included (mean age: 68.6 ± 10.4 years; male participants: 65.4%); 121 underwent completion surgery while 90 remained in surveillance. Thirty-two patients (15.2%) experienced RRM: 27 displayed residual malignancy in the surgical specimen and five developed recurrent disease. According to the SSPoCS algorithm: 120 patients were classified as having low-risk of residual disease, six of whom displayed RRM (5.0%); 10 as medium-risk, with one having RRM (10.0%); and 81 as high-risk, 25 of whom experienced RRM (30.9%). Lesions classified as low risk showed a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0% to exclude RRM. The algorithm demonstrated good accuracy in predicting RRM in a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65-0.83; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSPoCS algorithm revealed good accuracy in predicting residual/recurrent malignancy with a NPV of 95.0% to exclude RRM in low-risk lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2445699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2445699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:关于内镜下恶性结直肠息肉(MCP)切除术后的处理缺乏有力的证据。潜在预后因素报告的不一致性阻碍了决策过程。为了解决这些问题,苏格兰筛查息肉癌研究(sspoc)引入了一种基于两个容易获得的变量的算法:切除边缘和淋巴血管浸润。本研究旨在评估SSPoCS算法在葡萄牙多中心队列中的适用性。方法:选取5个中心经内镜切除的MCP。主要结果是残余/复发恶性肿瘤(RRM),定义为以下任何一种:(1)手术完成后手术标本中残余的壁内或淋巴结恶性肿瘤;(2)保守治疗患者的局部或全身复发性疾病。结果:纳入211例患者(平均年龄:68.6±10.4岁;男性:65.4%);121人接受了手术,90人仍在观察中。32例患者(15.2%)发生了RRM, 27例手术标本显示残留恶性肿瘤,5例复发。根据SSPoCS算法:120例患者被分类为低风险残留病,其中6例显示RRM (5.0%);10例为中等风险,1例为RRM (10.0%);高危81例,其中25例发生RRM(30.9%)。低风险病变的阴性预测值(NPV)为95.0%,排除了RRM。在受试者工作特性曲线分析中,该算法预测RRM的准确度较高(AUC: 0.74;95% ci: 0.65-0.83;结论:SSPoCS算法在预测残留/复发恶性肿瘤方面具有良好的准确性,NPV为95.0%,可排除低风险病变的RRM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of the Scottish screen-detected polyp cancer study (SSPoCS) algorithm in a multicentric cohort in the management of malignant colorectal polyps.

Background/objectives: Robust evidence regarding the management after endoscopic resection of malignant colorectal polyps (MCP) is lacking. Inconsistencies in reporting on potential prognostic factors hinder the decision process. To address these issues, the Scottish Screen-detected Polyp Cancer Study (SSPoCS) introduced an algorithm based in two easily obtainable variables: resection margin and lymphovascular invasion. This study aims to assess the applicability of the SSPoCS algorithm in a Portuguese multicentric cohort.

Methods: Endoscopically resected MCP in five centers were included. The main outcome was residual/recurrent malignancy (RRM), defined as any of the following: (1) residual intramural or lymph node malignancy in the surgical specimen after completion surgery; (2) local or systemic recurrent disease in conservatively managed patients.

Results: Two-hundred and eleven patients were included (mean age: 68.6 ± 10.4 years; male participants: 65.4%); 121 underwent completion surgery while 90 remained in surveillance. Thirty-two patients (15.2%) experienced RRM: 27 displayed residual malignancy in the surgical specimen and five developed recurrent disease. According to the SSPoCS algorithm: 120 patients were classified as having low-risk of residual disease, six of whom displayed RRM (5.0%); 10 as medium-risk, with one having RRM (10.0%); and 81 as high-risk, 25 of whom experienced RRM (30.9%). Lesions classified as low risk showed a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0% to exclude RRM. The algorithm demonstrated good accuracy in predicting RRM in a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The SSPoCS algorithm revealed good accuracy in predicting residual/recurrent malignancy with a NPV of 95.0% to exclude RRM in low-risk lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信