价格分拆前后在听力学诊所无助听器经验的成年人的助听器采用率。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Erin M Picou, Rebecca Wiacek, Todd A Ricketts, Richard A Roberts
{"title":"价格分拆前后在听力学诊所无助听器经验的成年人的助听器采用率。","authors":"Erin M Picou, Rebecca Wiacek, Todd A Ricketts, Richard A Roberts","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2443532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate a policy-related factor and patient-related factors that might affect hearing aid adoption for adults, specifically price unbundling, and demographic and audiologic factors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective data from hearing aid consultation appointments in an audiology clinic in a medical centre were examined. Appointments were conducted between 2019 and 2023, capturing visits when services and devices were charged using a model that was bundled (2019-2022) and unbundled (2023). In the unbundled model, a separate fee was charged for the consultation appointment.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Adults (<i>n</i> = 5186) without hearing aid experience who completed a hearing aid consultation appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After unbundling, a higher percentage of consultation appointments resulted in hearing aid adoptions (increased from 53% to 65%), despite a decline in the number of hearing aid consultation appointments. The absolute number of hearing aid adoptions per provider did not change over time. Also stable were reasons for hearing aid non-adoption; they were primarily related to lack of perceived hearing difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By unbundling and charging specifically for hearing aid consultation appointments, hearing aid consultations can be made more efficient, decreasing time spent with patients who do not need consultation services without negatively impacting revenue.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing aid adoption rates among adults without hearing aid experience in an audiology clinic before and after price unbundling.\",\"authors\":\"Erin M Picou, Rebecca Wiacek, Todd A Ricketts, Richard A Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2443532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate a policy-related factor and patient-related factors that might affect hearing aid adoption for adults, specifically price unbundling, and demographic and audiologic factors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective data from hearing aid consultation appointments in an audiology clinic in a medical centre were examined. Appointments were conducted between 2019 and 2023, capturing visits when services and devices were charged using a model that was bundled (2019-2022) and unbundled (2023). In the unbundled model, a separate fee was charged for the consultation appointment.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Adults (<i>n</i> = 5186) without hearing aid experience who completed a hearing aid consultation appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After unbundling, a higher percentage of consultation appointments resulted in hearing aid adoptions (increased from 53% to 65%), despite a decline in the number of hearing aid consultation appointments. The absolute number of hearing aid adoptions per provider did not change over time. Also stable were reasons for hearing aid non-adoption; they were primarily related to lack of perceived hearing difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By unbundling and charging specifically for hearing aid consultation appointments, hearing aid consultations can be made more efficient, decreasing time spent with patients who do not need consultation services without negatively impacting revenue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2443532\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2443532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是调查可能影响成人助听器采用的政策相关因素和患者相关因素,特别是价格分拆、人口统计学和听力学因素。设计:对某医疗中心听力学诊所助听器咨询预约的回顾性资料进行研究。预约是在2019年至2023年之间进行的,记录了使用捆绑(2019-2022年)和非捆绑(2023年)模式对服务和设备收费时的访问量。在非捆绑模式中,咨询预约需要单独收费。研究样本:成人(n = 5186)没有助听器经验,完成了助听器咨询预约。结果:尽管助听器咨询预约的数量有所下降,但在拆分后,更高比例的咨询预约导致了助听器的采用(从53%增加到65%)。每个助听器供应商的助听器绝对数量没有随着时间的推移而改变。不采用助听器的原因也比较稳定;它们主要与没有察觉到的听力困难有关。结论:通过对助听器咨询预约进行分拆和专门收费,可以提高助听器咨询的效率,减少与不需要咨询服务的患者在一起的时间,而不会对收入产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hearing aid adoption rates among adults without hearing aid experience in an audiology clinic before and after price unbundling.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate a policy-related factor and patient-related factors that might affect hearing aid adoption for adults, specifically price unbundling, and demographic and audiologic factors, respectively.

Design: Retrospective data from hearing aid consultation appointments in an audiology clinic in a medical centre were examined. Appointments were conducted between 2019 and 2023, capturing visits when services and devices were charged using a model that was bundled (2019-2022) and unbundled (2023). In the unbundled model, a separate fee was charged for the consultation appointment.

Study sample: Adults (n = 5186) without hearing aid experience who completed a hearing aid consultation appointment.

Results: After unbundling, a higher percentage of consultation appointments resulted in hearing aid adoptions (increased from 53% to 65%), despite a decline in the number of hearing aid consultation appointments. The absolute number of hearing aid adoptions per provider did not change over time. Also stable were reasons for hearing aid non-adoption; they were primarily related to lack of perceived hearing difficulty.

Conclusions: By unbundling and charging specifically for hearing aid consultation appointments, hearing aid consultations can be made more efficient, decreasing time spent with patients who do not need consultation services without negatively impacting revenue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信