Rubinnis Gutierrez-Disla, Rachana Gheewala, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs
{"title":"出血风险评分与围生期定量失血量。","authors":"Rubinnis Gutierrez-Disla, Rachana Gheewala, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk assessment tools are used by clinicians to predict which patients might have excessive bleeding. We studied the association between a peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score using peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) among those with vaginal deliveries who are often at lower risk for peripartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of 1221 patients with term vaginal deliveries at a public New York City hospital, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWOHNN) risk assessment tool was used to categorize patients as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for postpartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-risk scores were present in 925 (75.8%) patients, medium-risk scores in 268 (21.9%) patients, and high-risk scores in 28 (2.3%) patients. Outcome variables consisted of QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL), QBL ≥ 500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%), and ratio of postdelivery hematocrit to predelivery hematocrit (M = 0.9, SD = 0.08). High-risk score (B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, <i>P</i> = 0.04) but not medium-risk score was significantly associated with increased QBL as compared to low-risk score. Body mass index (BMI) measured as a continuous variable was significantly associated with increased QBL (B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.049). However, BMI measured as a categorical variable using the AWOHNN cutoff score of >35 was not significantly associated with QBL. AWOHNN score was not significantly associated with QBL ≥ 500 mL or with the ratio of postdelivery hematocrit with predelivery hematocrit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend revising the AWOHNN measure to better reflect medium risk and to consider a different approach for BMI use as part of the AWOHNN risk score.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss.\",\"authors\":\"Rubinnis Gutierrez-Disla, Rachana Gheewala, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk assessment tools are used by clinicians to predict which patients might have excessive bleeding. We studied the association between a peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score using peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) among those with vaginal deliveries who are often at lower risk for peripartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of 1221 patients with term vaginal deliveries at a public New York City hospital, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWOHNN) risk assessment tool was used to categorize patients as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for postpartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-risk scores were present in 925 (75.8%) patients, medium-risk scores in 268 (21.9%) patients, and high-risk scores in 28 (2.3%) patients. Outcome variables consisted of QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL), QBL ≥ 500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%), and ratio of postdelivery hematocrit to predelivery hematocrit (M = 0.9, SD = 0.08). High-risk score (B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, <i>P</i> = 0.04) but not medium-risk score was significantly associated with increased QBL as compared to low-risk score. Body mass index (BMI) measured as a continuous variable was significantly associated with increased QBL (B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.049). However, BMI measured as a categorical variable using the AWOHNN cutoff score of >35 was not significantly associated with QBL. AWOHNN score was not significantly associated with QBL ≥ 500 mL or with the ratio of postdelivery hematocrit with predelivery hematocrit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend revising the AWOHNN measure to better reflect medium risk and to consider a different approach for BMI use as part of the AWOHNN risk score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"7-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:临床医生使用风险评估工具来预测哪些患者可能出现大出血。我们研究了围生期出血风险评估评分与围生期量化失血量(QBL)在阴道分娩的围生期出血风险较低的妇女之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析纽约市一家公立医院1221例阴道足月分娩患者,采用妇女健康、产科和新生儿护士协会(AWOHNN)风险评估工具将患者分为产后出血低风险、中风险和高风险。结果:925例(75.8%)患者出现低危评分,268例(21.9%)患者出现中危评分,28例(2.3%)患者出现高危评分。结果变量包括QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL)、QBL≥500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%)和产后红细胞比容与产前红细胞比容之比(M = 0.9, SD = 0.08)。与低危评分相比,高危评分(B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, P = 0.04)与QBL升高有显著相关性,而中危评分与QBL升高无显著相关性。身体质量指数(BMI)作为一个连续变量与QBL的增加显著相关(B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, P = 0.049)。然而,使用AWOHNN截止评分bbbb35作为分类变量测量的BMI与QBL没有显著相关性。AWOHNN评分与QBL≥500 mL或产后红细胞压积与产前红细胞压积之比无显著相关性。结论:我们建议修改AWOHNN测量方法以更好地反映中等风险,并考虑采用不同的方法将BMI作为AWOHNN风险评分的一部分。
Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss.
Background: Risk assessment tools are used by clinicians to predict which patients might have excessive bleeding. We studied the association between a peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score using peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) among those with vaginal deliveries who are often at lower risk for peripartum hemorrhage.
Methods: In this retrospective analysis of 1221 patients with term vaginal deliveries at a public New York City hospital, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWOHNN) risk assessment tool was used to categorize patients as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for postpartum hemorrhage.
Results: Low-risk scores were present in 925 (75.8%) patients, medium-risk scores in 268 (21.9%) patients, and high-risk scores in 28 (2.3%) patients. Outcome variables consisted of QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL), QBL ≥ 500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%), and ratio of postdelivery hematocrit to predelivery hematocrit (M = 0.9, SD = 0.08). High-risk score (B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, P = 0.04) but not medium-risk score was significantly associated with increased QBL as compared to low-risk score. Body mass index (BMI) measured as a continuous variable was significantly associated with increased QBL (B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, P = 0.049). However, BMI measured as a categorical variable using the AWOHNN cutoff score of >35 was not significantly associated with QBL. AWOHNN score was not significantly associated with QBL ≥ 500 mL or with the ratio of postdelivery hematocrit with predelivery hematocrit.
Conclusion: We recommend revising the AWOHNN measure to better reflect medium risk and to consider a different approach for BMI use as part of the AWOHNN risk score.