污水污泥作为土壤改良剂的生态风险评价:臭Eisenia fetida的致死和亚致死效应。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Maria Luisa Vannuccini, Ramona Assenza, Lucrezia Sturba, Claudia Faleri, Ilaria Corsi
{"title":"污水污泥作为土壤改良剂的生态风险评价:臭Eisenia fetida的致死和亚致死效应。","authors":"Maria Luisa Vannuccini,&nbsp;Ramona Assenza,&nbsp;Lucrezia Sturba,&nbsp;Claudia Faleri,&nbsp;Ilaria Corsi","doi":"10.1007/s11356-024-35757-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sewage sludge applications as soil amendment call for a proper ecological risk assessment due to unexpected delivery of toxic chemicals and materials. Standardized acute toxicity assays have proven to provide limited information in terms of potential hazard for soil organisms. Here, sublethal endpoints as physiological and tissue alterations were proposed as suitable tools for sewage sludge ecological risk assessment. Acute toxicity assay using earthworm <i>Eisenia fetida</i> (OECD n.207) was performed on sewage sludge samples from two wastewater treatment plants (A and B), and mortality, body weight, body morphology, and histology of intestinal cavity were evaluated at the end of the exposure period. Sewage sludge dilutions (1:50 and 1:100) from plant B caused a low percentage of mortality (5%), while none was observed in worms exposed to plant A. However, all specimens showed external body alterations as vesicles, swellings, constrictions, and discoloration. Histological sections highlight damages to epidermis, circular and longitudinal muscles, and chloragogenic tissue regardless of sewage sludge origin. Our findings confirm that standardized end points of acute toxicity are not sensitive enough in worms exposed to sewage sludges, while sublethal endpoints as body morphology and tissue histology are thus more suitable and appropriate endpoints for assessing potential detrimental outcomes and ecological risk for soil biota.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 2","pages":"963 - 975"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological risk assessment of sewage sludge as soil amendment: lethal and sublethal effects in Eisenia fetida\",\"authors\":\"Maria Luisa Vannuccini,&nbsp;Ramona Assenza,&nbsp;Lucrezia Sturba,&nbsp;Claudia Faleri,&nbsp;Ilaria Corsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-024-35757-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sewage sludge applications as soil amendment call for a proper ecological risk assessment due to unexpected delivery of toxic chemicals and materials. Standardized acute toxicity assays have proven to provide limited information in terms of potential hazard for soil organisms. Here, sublethal endpoints as physiological and tissue alterations were proposed as suitable tools for sewage sludge ecological risk assessment. Acute toxicity assay using earthworm <i>Eisenia fetida</i> (OECD n.207) was performed on sewage sludge samples from two wastewater treatment plants (A and B), and mortality, body weight, body morphology, and histology of intestinal cavity were evaluated at the end of the exposure period. Sewage sludge dilutions (1:50 and 1:100) from plant B caused a low percentage of mortality (5%), while none was observed in worms exposed to plant A. However, all specimens showed external body alterations as vesicles, swellings, constrictions, and discoloration. Histological sections highlight damages to epidermis, circular and longitudinal muscles, and chloragogenic tissue regardless of sewage sludge origin. Our findings confirm that standardized end points of acute toxicity are not sensitive enough in worms exposed to sewage sludges, while sublethal endpoints as body morphology and tissue histology are thus more suitable and appropriate endpoints for assessing potential detrimental outcomes and ecological risk for soil biota.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"963 - 975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35757-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35757-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

污水污泥作为土壤改良剂的应用需要适当的生态风险评估,因为有毒化学物质和材料的意外输送。标准化急性毒性测定已证明在土壤生物的潜在危害方面提供的信息有限。在这里,亚致死终点作为生理和组织改变被提出作为污水污泥生态风险评估的合适工具。对两个污水处理厂(A和B)的污水污泥样本进行了急性毒性试验,并在暴露期结束时评估了死亡率、体重、身体形态和肠道组织学。来自植物B的污水污泥稀释(1:50和1:100)导致低死亡率(5%),而暴露于植物a的蠕虫没有观察到任何死亡率。然而,所有标本都显示出外部变化,如囊泡、肿胀、收缩和变色。组织学切片突出了对表皮、圆形和纵向肌肉以及生氯组织的损害,而不考虑污水污泥的来源。我们的研究结果证实,在暴露于污水污泥的蠕虫中,急性毒性的标准化终点不够敏感,而亚致死终点(如身体形态和组织组织学)因此更适合和适当地评估土壤生物群的潜在有害结果和生态风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological risk assessment of sewage sludge as soil amendment: lethal and sublethal effects in Eisenia fetida

Sewage sludge applications as soil amendment call for a proper ecological risk assessment due to unexpected delivery of toxic chemicals and materials. Standardized acute toxicity assays have proven to provide limited information in terms of potential hazard for soil organisms. Here, sublethal endpoints as physiological and tissue alterations were proposed as suitable tools for sewage sludge ecological risk assessment. Acute toxicity assay using earthworm Eisenia fetida (OECD n.207) was performed on sewage sludge samples from two wastewater treatment plants (A and B), and mortality, body weight, body morphology, and histology of intestinal cavity were evaluated at the end of the exposure period. Sewage sludge dilutions (1:50 and 1:100) from plant B caused a low percentage of mortality (5%), while none was observed in worms exposed to plant A. However, all specimens showed external body alterations as vesicles, swellings, constrictions, and discoloration. Histological sections highlight damages to epidermis, circular and longitudinal muscles, and chloragogenic tissue regardless of sewage sludge origin. Our findings confirm that standardized end points of acute toxicity are not sensitive enough in worms exposed to sewage sludges, while sublethal endpoints as body morphology and tissue histology are thus more suitable and appropriate endpoints for assessing potential detrimental outcomes and ecological risk for soil biota.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信