涡轮进气冷却对小型平行流布雷顿循环的影响

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
C.C. Cockcroft, W.G. Le Roux
{"title":"涡轮进气冷却对小型平行流布雷顿循环的影响","authors":"C.C. Cockcroft, W.G. Le Roux","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve an open air-operated parallel-flow Brayton cycle, the air entering the compressor inlet can be cooled via the concept of turbine inlet air cooling (TIAC). This work investigates whether TIAC forms a worthwhile improvement to the power output and thermal efficiency of a parallel-flow Brayton cycle. An analytical approach is followed to compare the results between a low-temperature turbine (LTT) setup and a similar setup with an added cooling loop for the TIAC concept, considering different crossflow condenser dimensions. A range of commercial turbochargers are used to model the compressor and turbines and the best turbocharger combinations are considered for further analysis. Considering the same pressure ratio, the TIAC cycle does not offer better power output nor thermal efficiency than the LTT cycle, however, it is able to lower the required gasifier turbine inlet temperature (which may not exceed 1200 K due to turbomachinery manufacturer limits). When comparing the LTT and TIAC cycles at their optimum operating points, which shifts to a higher compressor pressure ratio for the TIAC cycle due to a larger TIAC compatibility range, the TIAC layout obtains 64.9 % more power output and a 31.4 % improvement in thermal efficiency for the combination between the G25-550 (AR = 0.92) main shaft turbocharger and the GBC14-200 power turbine. It is recommended to investigate recuperated and solar cycle configurations for further cycle thermal efficiency improvements.","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"283 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of applying turbine inlet air cooling to a small-scale parallel-flow Brayton cycle\",\"authors\":\"C.C. Cockcroft, W.G. Le Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve an open air-operated parallel-flow Brayton cycle, the air entering the compressor inlet can be cooled via the concept of turbine inlet air cooling (TIAC). This work investigates whether TIAC forms a worthwhile improvement to the power output and thermal efficiency of a parallel-flow Brayton cycle. An analytical approach is followed to compare the results between a low-temperature turbine (LTT) setup and a similar setup with an added cooling loop for the TIAC concept, considering different crossflow condenser dimensions. A range of commercial turbochargers are used to model the compressor and turbines and the best turbocharger combinations are considered for further analysis. Considering the same pressure ratio, the TIAC cycle does not offer better power output nor thermal efficiency than the LTT cycle, however, it is able to lower the required gasifier turbine inlet temperature (which may not exceed 1200 K due to turbomachinery manufacturer limits). When comparing the LTT and TIAC cycles at their optimum operating points, which shifts to a higher compressor pressure ratio for the TIAC cycle due to a larger TIAC compatibility range, the TIAC layout obtains 64.9 % more power output and a 31.4 % improvement in thermal efficiency for the combination between the G25-550 (AR = 0.92) main shaft turbocharger and the GBC14-200 power turbine. It is recommended to investigate recuperated and solar cycle configurations for further cycle thermal efficiency improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119407\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了改善开式空气操作的平行流布雷顿循环,进入压缩机入口的空气可以通过涡轮入口空气冷却(TIAC)的概念进行冷却。这项工作研究TIAC是否形成一个有价值的改进功率输出和热效率的平行流布雷顿循环。考虑到不同的横流冷凝器尺寸,采用分析方法比较了低温涡轮(LTT)装置和TIAC概念中带有附加冷却回路的类似装置之间的结果。一系列商用涡轮增压器被用来模拟压气机和涡轮机,并考虑最佳的涡轮增压器组合进行进一步分析。考虑到相同的压力比,TIAC循环不提供更好的功率输出和热效率比LTT循环,然而,它能够降低所需的气化炉涡轮入口温度(由于涡轮机械制造商的限制,可能不超过1200 K)。当比较LTT和TIAC循环在其最佳工作点时,由于TIAC兼容范围更大,TIAC循环的压气机压力比更高,G25-550 (AR = 0.92)主轴涡轮增压器与GBC14-200动力涡轮的组合,TIAC布局的功率输出增加了64.9%,热效率提高了31.4%。建议研究回收和太阳能循环配置,以进一步提高循环热效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of applying turbine inlet air cooling to a small-scale parallel-flow Brayton cycle
To improve an open air-operated parallel-flow Brayton cycle, the air entering the compressor inlet can be cooled via the concept of turbine inlet air cooling (TIAC). This work investigates whether TIAC forms a worthwhile improvement to the power output and thermal efficiency of a parallel-flow Brayton cycle. An analytical approach is followed to compare the results between a low-temperature turbine (LTT) setup and a similar setup with an added cooling loop for the TIAC concept, considering different crossflow condenser dimensions. A range of commercial turbochargers are used to model the compressor and turbines and the best turbocharger combinations are considered for further analysis. Considering the same pressure ratio, the TIAC cycle does not offer better power output nor thermal efficiency than the LTT cycle, however, it is able to lower the required gasifier turbine inlet temperature (which may not exceed 1200 K due to turbomachinery manufacturer limits). When comparing the LTT and TIAC cycles at their optimum operating points, which shifts to a higher compressor pressure ratio for the TIAC cycle due to a larger TIAC compatibility range, the TIAC layout obtains 64.9 % more power output and a 31.4 % improvement in thermal efficiency for the combination between the G25-550 (AR = 0.92) main shaft turbocharger and the GBC14-200 power turbine. It is recommended to investigate recuperated and solar cycle configurations for further cycle thermal efficiency improvements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信