对Duan等人的评论：RNR的光彩依然存在

IF 1.8 2区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Journal of Experimental Criminology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5

James Bonta, Paul Gendreau

{"title":"对Duan等人的评论：RNR的光彩依然存在","authors":"James Bonta, Paul Gendreau","doi":"10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives </h3><p>Duan et al. (2024) published a meta-analysis in this journal claiming that the risk-need-responsivity principles are not “golden”.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We challenge their conclusion by pointing out some major errors in their literature search and classification of studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results </h3><p>Central to our argument is that Duan and his colleagues incorrectly identified a significant number of RNR studies as non-RNR. Consequently, their results led to an incorrect conclusion.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our re-analysis of their data finds that the RNR principles remain highly relevant to the rehabilitation field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A commentary on Duan et al.: RNR’s luster remains\",\"authors\":\"James Bonta, Paul Gendreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives </h3><p>Duan et al. (2024) published a meta-analysis in this journal claiming that the risk-need-responsivity principles are not “golden”.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We challenge their conclusion by pointing out some major errors in their literature search and classification of studies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results </h3><p>Central to our argument is that Duan and his colleagues incorrectly identified a significant number of RNR studies as non-RNR. Consequently, their results led to an incorrect conclusion.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our re-analysis of their data finds that the RNR principles remain highly relevant to the rehabilitation field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Duan等人（2024）在该杂志上发表了一篇荟萃分析，声称风险-需求-反应原则并非“黄金”原则。方法对他们的结论提出质疑，指出他们在文献检索和研究分类上的一些主要错误。我们的论点的核心是Duan和他的同事错误地将大量RNR研究识别为非RNR。因此，他们的结果导致了一个错误的结论。结论我们重新分析了他们的数据，发现RNR原则在康复领域仍然具有很高的相关性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A commentary on Duan et al.: RNR’s luster remains

Objectives

Duan et al. (2024) published a meta-analysis in this journal claiming that the risk-need-responsivity principles are not “golden”.

Methods

We challenge their conclusion by pointing out some major errors in their literature search and classification of studies.

Results

Central to our argument is that Duan and his colleagues incorrectly identified a significant number of RNR studies as non-RNR. Consequently, their results led to an incorrect conclusion.

Conclusion

Our re-analysis of their data finds that the RNR principles remain highly relevant to the rehabilitation field.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.