能源成本的分配效应:公司所有权结构重要吗?

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Andu Berha, Sandeep Mohapatra
{"title":"能源成本的分配效应:公司所有权结构重要吗?","authors":"Andu Berha,&nbsp;Sandeep Mohapatra","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the effect of ownership structure on the distribution of household electricity costs and its implications for income inequality. We leverage data on household electricity expenditure, income, and utility tariff structures to provide new insights into the comparative merits of alternative ownership regimes in the U.S. electricity sector. We use ownership discontinuities between adjacent statistical areas to establish causal effects. We find strong evidence that electricity costs are more regressive under cooperative and public ownership, resulting in undesirable distributional outcomes. Households served by cooperative and publicly-owned utilities spend a larger share of their income on electricity than those served by private utilities. We present suggestive evidence that high fixed charges and limited segmentation of economically diverse consumer groups are potential mechanisms driving the observed regressivity of electricity costs. Our findings highlight the role of firms ownership structures and pricing strategies in shaping existing income inequality by determining how energy burdens are distributed across income groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108108"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributional effects of energy costs: Does firm ownership structure matter?\",\"authors\":\"Andu Berha,&nbsp;Sandeep Mohapatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the effect of ownership structure on the distribution of household electricity costs and its implications for income inequality. We leverage data on household electricity expenditure, income, and utility tariff structures to provide new insights into the comparative merits of alternative ownership regimes in the U.S. electricity sector. We use ownership discontinuities between adjacent statistical areas to establish causal effects. We find strong evidence that electricity costs are more regressive under cooperative and public ownership, resulting in undesirable distributional outcomes. Households served by cooperative and publicly-owned utilities spend a larger share of their income on electricity than those served by private utilities. We present suggestive evidence that high fixed charges and limited segmentation of economically diverse consumer groups are potential mechanisms driving the observed regressivity of electricity costs. Our findings highlight the role of firms ownership structures and pricing strategies in shaping existing income inequality by determining how energy burdens are distributed across income groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832400817X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832400817X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了所有制结构对家庭电力成本分布的影响及其对收入不平等的影响。我们利用家庭电力支出、收入和公用事业电价结构的数据,为美国电力行业不同所有权制度的比较优点提供新的见解。我们使用相邻统计区域之间的所有权不连续性来建立因果关系。我们发现强有力的证据表明,在合作所有制和公有制的情况下,电力成本的递减更大,从而导致不理想的分配结果。与私营公用事业单位相比,合作社和公有公用事业单位所服务的家庭在电费上的支出占其收入的比例更大。我们提出的证据表明,高昂的固定费用和经济上不同的消费者群体的有限分割是驱动观察到的电力成本回归的潜在机制。我们的研究结果强调了企业所有权结构和定价策略的作用,通过决定能源负担如何在收入群体中分配来形成现有的收入不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributional effects of energy costs: Does firm ownership structure matter?
This paper examines the effect of ownership structure on the distribution of household electricity costs and its implications for income inequality. We leverage data on household electricity expenditure, income, and utility tariff structures to provide new insights into the comparative merits of alternative ownership regimes in the U.S. electricity sector. We use ownership discontinuities between adjacent statistical areas to establish causal effects. We find strong evidence that electricity costs are more regressive under cooperative and public ownership, resulting in undesirable distributional outcomes. Households served by cooperative and publicly-owned utilities spend a larger share of their income on electricity than those served by private utilities. We present suggestive evidence that high fixed charges and limited segmentation of economically diverse consumer groups are potential mechanisms driving the observed regressivity of electricity costs. Our findings highlight the role of firms ownership structures and pricing strategies in shaping existing income inequality by determining how energy burdens are distributed across income groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信