结构方程模型评估成人在怀孕期间推荐疫苗的疫苗犹豫量表。

Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-01-25 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126568
Tasmiah Nuzhath, Yingwei Yang, Marie-Claude Couture, Ning Yan Gu, Jeannette L Comeau, Annette K Regan
{"title":"结构方程模型评估成人在怀孕期间推荐疫苗的疫苗犹豫量表。","authors":"Tasmiah Nuzhath, Yingwei Yang, Marie-Claude Couture, Ning Yan Gu, Jeannette L Comeau, Annette K Regan","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acceptance of recommended vaccines is lower among pregnant people compared to non-pregnant adults, yet no tool has specifically measured prenatal vaccine hesitancy. We evaluated the performance of an existing adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) in measuring vaccine hesitancy toward routinely recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional national online survey with 917 US postpartum adults 18-49 years old who had given birth in the past six months. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using the aVHS, a 10-item scale previously validated among the adult general population. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater vaccine hesitancy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with weighted least squares means and variances adjusted (WLSMV) estimator was used to assess the fit of the aVHS structure. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the aVHS score and the self-reported receipt of recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEM indicated acceptable fit (RMSEA: 0.098; CFI: 0.983; TLI: 0.978; SRMR: 0.040) of the data to the two-factor model: (1) lack of vaccine confidence, and (2) perceived vaccine risks. For the paths from the two factors to the vaccine acceptance, lack of vaccine confidence was significantly correlated with influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.41, p < 0.001) and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (β = -0.64, p < 0.001), while perceived vaccine risk was significantly linked with Tdap vaccine acceptance (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) and influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.25, p < 0.001). Additionally, pregnant people with higher aVHS scores were less likely to receive recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the aVHS offered acceptable measurement of prenatal vaccine hesitancy, a scale that measures pregnancy-specific concerns may offer more tailored measurement for this unique population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"45 ","pages":"126568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural equation modeling to evaluate the adult vaccine hesitancy scale for vaccines recommended during pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Tasmiah Nuzhath, Yingwei Yang, Marie-Claude Couture, Ning Yan Gu, Jeannette L Comeau, Annette K Regan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acceptance of recommended vaccines is lower among pregnant people compared to non-pregnant adults, yet no tool has specifically measured prenatal vaccine hesitancy. We evaluated the performance of an existing adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) in measuring vaccine hesitancy toward routinely recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional national online survey with 917 US postpartum adults 18-49 years old who had given birth in the past six months. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using the aVHS, a 10-item scale previously validated among the adult general population. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater vaccine hesitancy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with weighted least squares means and variances adjusted (WLSMV) estimator was used to assess the fit of the aVHS structure. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the aVHS score and the self-reported receipt of recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEM indicated acceptable fit (RMSEA: 0.098; CFI: 0.983; TLI: 0.978; SRMR: 0.040) of the data to the two-factor model: (1) lack of vaccine confidence, and (2) perceived vaccine risks. For the paths from the two factors to the vaccine acceptance, lack of vaccine confidence was significantly correlated with influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.41, p < 0.001) and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (β = -0.64, p < 0.001), while perceived vaccine risk was significantly linked with Tdap vaccine acceptance (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) and influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.25, p < 0.001). Additionally, pregnant people with higher aVHS scores were less likely to receive recommended prenatal vaccines.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the aVHS offered acceptable measurement of prenatal vaccine hesitancy, a scale that measures pregnancy-specific concerns may offer more tailored measurement for this unique population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"126568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与未怀孕的成年人相比,孕妇对推荐疫苗的接受度较低,但没有工具专门测量产前疫苗犹豫。我们评估了现有成人疫苗犹豫量表(aVHS)在衡量对常规推荐的产前疫苗的疫苗犹豫方面的表现。方法:在2021年12月至2022年4月期间,我们对917名在过去六个月内分娩的18-49岁的美国产后成年人进行了横断面全国在线调查。疫苗犹豫使用aVHS进行测量,aVHS是一种10项量表,先前在成年普通人群中得到验证。得分范围从10到50,得分越高表明对疫苗的犹豫越大。采用加权最小二乘和方差调整(WLSMV)估计量的结构方程模型(SEM)来评估aVHS结构的拟合性。通过检查aVHS评分与自我报告接受产前推荐疫苗之间的相关性来评估结构效度。结果:SEM为可接受拟合(RMSEA: 0.098;CFI: 0.983;TLI: 0.978;SRMR: 0.040)对双因素模型的影响:(1)缺乏疫苗信心;(2)感知疫苗风险。对于从这两个因素到疫苗接受度的路径,缺乏疫苗信心与流感疫苗接受度显著相关(β = -0.41, p)。讨论:尽管aVHS提供了产前疫苗犹豫的可接受测量,但测量妊娠特异性问题的量表可能为这一独特人群提供更定制的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural equation modeling to evaluate the adult vaccine hesitancy scale for vaccines recommended during pregnancy.

Introduction: Acceptance of recommended vaccines is lower among pregnant people compared to non-pregnant adults, yet no tool has specifically measured prenatal vaccine hesitancy. We evaluated the performance of an existing adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) in measuring vaccine hesitancy toward routinely recommended prenatal vaccines.

Methods: Between December 2021 and April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional national online survey with 917 US postpartum adults 18-49 years old who had given birth in the past six months. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using the aVHS, a 10-item scale previously validated among the adult general population. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater vaccine hesitancy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with weighted least squares means and variances adjusted (WLSMV) estimator was used to assess the fit of the aVHS structure. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the aVHS score and the self-reported receipt of recommended prenatal vaccines.

Results: SEM indicated acceptable fit (RMSEA: 0.098; CFI: 0.983; TLI: 0.978; SRMR: 0.040) of the data to the two-factor model: (1) lack of vaccine confidence, and (2) perceived vaccine risks. For the paths from the two factors to the vaccine acceptance, lack of vaccine confidence was significantly correlated with influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.41, p < 0.001) and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (β = -0.64, p < 0.001), while perceived vaccine risk was significantly linked with Tdap vaccine acceptance (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) and influenza vaccine acceptance (β = -0.25, p < 0.001). Additionally, pregnant people with higher aVHS scores were less likely to receive recommended prenatal vaccines.

Discussion: Although the aVHS offered acceptable measurement of prenatal vaccine hesitancy, a scale that measures pregnancy-specific concerns may offer more tailored measurement for this unique population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信