NPC-25(组氨酸水合锌)治疗低锌血症患者的随机、多中心、主动对照开放标签研究(非劣效性优于NOBELZIN™,醋酸锌二水合物)。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Daisuke Asaoka , Tomomi Ishihara , Sachiko Ezoe , Izumi Hamada , Motohiro Kitamura , Kuniyasu Uchino , Kunio Arai , Yoshihiko Kanno , Hiroko Kodama
{"title":"NPC-25(组氨酸水合锌)治疗低锌血症患者的随机、多中心、主动对照开放标签研究(非劣效性优于NOBELZIN™,醋酸锌二水合物)。","authors":"Daisuke Asaoka ,&nbsp;Tomomi Ishihara ,&nbsp;Sachiko Ezoe ,&nbsp;Izumi Hamada ,&nbsp;Motohiro Kitamura ,&nbsp;Kuniyasu Uchino ,&nbsp;Kunio Arai ,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Kanno ,&nbsp;Hiroko Kodama","doi":"10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were &lt;70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and &lt;200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.</div><div>There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 127558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, multicenter, active-controlled open-label study of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, (non-inferiority to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate) for patients with hypozincemia\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Asaoka ,&nbsp;Tomomi Ishihara ,&nbsp;Sachiko Ezoe ,&nbsp;Izumi Hamada ,&nbsp;Motohiro Kitamura ,&nbsp;Kuniyasu Uchino ,&nbsp;Kunio Arai ,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Kanno ,&nbsp;Hiroko Kodama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were &lt;70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and &lt;200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.</div><div>There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X24001780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X24001780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价水合组氨酸锌NPC-25治疗低锌血症的疗效和安全性。这项随机多中心主动对照开放标签试验旨在验证NPC-25对NOBELZIN™(醋酸锌二水合物)的非劣效性。结果:主要终点为完整分析(FAS)组(n=103, NPC-25组;n=107, NOBELZIN组),在相同剂量下维持8周目标血清锌浓度的参与者比例在NPC-25组为86.4 %(89/103),在NOBELZIN组为80.4 %(86/107),这证实了NPC-25对NOBELZIN™的非效性。对于FAS的次要终点,在每个观察点上,尽管两组达到目标血清锌浓度的参与者比例没有显著差异,但有一种趋势,即NPC-25能更早地维持8周的目标浓度。在NPC-25组中,也有较低日剂量达到维持的趋势。此外,在每个观察点,两组之间的平均血清锌浓度或血清锌浓度从基线的平均变化均无显著差异。在安全人群(SP)的安全性评估中,NPC-25的恶心和呕吐发生率低于NOBELZIN(恶心发生率分别为2.8 %和6.4 %,呕吐发生率分别为0.9 %和2.8 %),但在其他药物不良反应方面差异无统计学意义。结论:在本研究中,NPC-25在疗效和安全性方面均与NOBELZIN™无劣效性。此外,在安全性方面,NPC-25导致恶心和呕吐等消化系统症状的发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized, multicenter, active-controlled open-label study of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, (non-inferiority to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate) for patients with hypozincemia

Objective

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.

Methods

Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were <70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and <200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.

Results

For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.
There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
202
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: The journal provides the reader with a thorough description of theoretical and applied aspects of trace elements in medicine and biology and is devoted to the advancement of scientific knowledge about trace elements and trace element species. Trace elements play essential roles in the maintenance of physiological processes. During the last decades there has been a great deal of scientific investigation about the function and binding of trace elements. The Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology focuses on the description and dissemination of scientific results concerning the role of trace elements with respect to their mode of action in health and disease and nutritional importance. Progress in the knowledge of the biological role of trace elements depends, however, on advances in trace elements chemistry. Thus the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology will include only those papers that base their results on proven analytical methods. Also, we only publish those articles in which the quality assurance regarding the execution of experiments and achievement of results is guaranteed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信