{"title":"NPC-25(组氨酸水合锌)治疗低锌血症患者的随机、多中心、主动对照开放标签研究(非劣效性优于NOBELZIN™,醋酸锌二水合物)。","authors":"Daisuke Asaoka , Tomomi Ishihara , Sachiko Ezoe , Izumi Hamada , Motohiro Kitamura , Kuniyasu Uchino , Kunio Arai , Yoshihiko Kanno , Hiroko Kodama","doi":"10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were <70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and <200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.</div><div>There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 127558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, multicenter, active-controlled open-label study of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, (non-inferiority to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate) for patients with hypozincemia\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Asaoka , Tomomi Ishihara , Sachiko Ezoe , Izumi Hamada , Motohiro Kitamura , Kuniyasu Uchino , Kunio Arai , Yoshihiko Kanno , Hiroko Kodama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were <70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and <200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.</div><div>There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X24001780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X24001780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized, multicenter, active-controlled open-label study of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, (non-inferiority to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate) for patients with hypozincemia
Objective
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NPC-25, zinc histidine hydrate, in patients with hypozincemia. This randomized multicenter active-controlled open-label trial aimed to verify the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™, zinc acetate dihydrate.
Methods
Participants whose serum zinc concentrations were <70 μg/dL at two points within 8 weeks before the start of treatment were randomized 1:1 into the NPC-25 (active drug) administration group and the NOBELZIN™ (control drug) administration group, using dynamic allocation. The initial daily doses were 50 mg or 100 mg as the baseline serum zinc levels, and administration periods were set at maximum of 24 weeks with the goal of maintaining the target serum zinc concentration (≥80 and <200 μg/dL) for 8 weeks, with extension up to 52 weeks as needed in the NPC-25 group, but not the NOBELZIN group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage within 24 weeks after the start of administration. The key secondary endpoints were the cumulative achievement percentage for target serum zinc concentration at each observation time point, the cumulative achievement percentage for maintenance of target concentration for 8 weeks at the same dosage at each observation time point, change in mean serum zinc concentration, and comparison of dosage amount. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, as well as changes in clinical laboratory and physical measurements.
Results
For the primary endpoint for full analysis (FAS) set (n=103, NPC-25 group; n=107, NOBELZIN group), the proportion of participants who maintained the target serum zinc concentration for 8 weeks at the same dose was 86.4 % (89/103) in the NPC-25 group and 80.4 % (86/107) in the NOBELZIN group, which confirmed the non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™. For the secondary endpoint for FAS, at each observation point, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants who achieved the target serum zinc concentration, there was a tendency that the maintenance of the target concentration for 8 weeks was achieved earlier with NPC-25.
There was also a tendency to achieve maintenance with a lower daily dose in the NPC-25 group. Furthermore, at each observation point, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean serum zinc concentration or the average change in serum zinc concentration from baseline. In the safety assessment for safety population (SP), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower with NPC-25 than with NOBELZIN (2.8 % and 6.4 % with nausea, 0.9 % and 2.8 % with vomiting), but there were no significant differences in other adverse drug reactions.
Conclusion
In this study, non-inferiority of NPC-25 to NOBELZIN™ was confirmed in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, regarding safety, NPC-25 resulted in a lower frequency of digestive symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting.
期刊介绍:
The journal provides the reader with a thorough description of theoretical and applied aspects of trace elements in medicine and biology and is devoted to the advancement of scientific knowledge about trace elements and trace element species. Trace elements play essential roles in the maintenance of physiological processes. During the last decades there has been a great deal of scientific investigation about the function and binding of trace elements. The Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology focuses on the description and dissemination of scientific results concerning the role of trace elements with respect to their mode of action in health and disease and nutritional importance. Progress in the knowledge of the biological role of trace elements depends, however, on advances in trace elements chemistry. Thus the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology will include only those papers that base their results on proven analytical methods.
Also, we only publish those articles in which the quality assurance regarding the execution of experiments and achievement of results is guaranteed.