通过损伤机制和社会支持的测量,加强创伤患者床边心理健康风险筛查。

Zoe M F Brier, Kenneth J Ruggiero, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Hannah C Espeleta
{"title":"通过损伤机制和社会支持的测量,加强创伤患者床边心理健康风险筛查。","authors":"Zoe M F Brier, Kenneth J Ruggiero, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Hannah C Espeleta","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons now requires mental health screening and follow up for hospitalized patients in trauma centers. National estimates indicate that 20-40 % of these patients will develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression within one year post-injury. Research has identified brief bedside screens that predict PTSD and depression post-discharge, such as the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory. However, false negatives are common; almost a quarter of patients with a negative bedside risk screen may develop PTSD or depression post-discharge and may not receive appropriate follow up. As such, there is critical need to improve bedside risk-screening tools. We aimed to identify demographic, social, and trauma-related predictors of mental health symptoms among patients with negative bedside screens.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were injury survivors served by a Level I trauma center who were identified as \"low risk for development of PTSD/depression\" by the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen. Patient injury type and demographics were collected from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Violent injuries (e.g., gunshot wound) and lower levels of available social support predicted elevated PTSD symptoms 30-days post-injury. Lower social support also was associated with increased risk for depressive symptoms 30 days post-injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that risk-screening tools may be improved by including items that capture injury mechanism and social support. Alternatively, trauma centers should consider mental health referral for patients who have experienced violent trauma or have low levels of social support, even when bedside screening tools identify them as having low mental health risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedside mental health risk screening of traumatic injury patients is enhanced by measurement of injury mechanism and social support.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe M F Brier, Kenneth J Ruggiero, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Hannah C Espeleta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons now requires mental health screening and follow up for hospitalized patients in trauma centers. National estimates indicate that 20-40 % of these patients will develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression within one year post-injury. Research has identified brief bedside screens that predict PTSD and depression post-discharge, such as the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory. However, false negatives are common; almost a quarter of patients with a negative bedside risk screen may develop PTSD or depression post-discharge and may not receive appropriate follow up. As such, there is critical need to improve bedside risk-screening tools. We aimed to identify demographic, social, and trauma-related predictors of mental health symptoms among patients with negative bedside screens.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were injury survivors served by a Level I trauma center who were identified as \\\"low risk for development of PTSD/depression\\\" by the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen. Patient injury type and demographics were collected from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Violent injuries (e.g., gunshot wound) and lower levels of available social support predicted elevated PTSD symptoms 30-days post-injury. Lower social support also was associated with increased risk for depressive symptoms 30 days post-injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that risk-screening tools may be improved by including items that capture injury mechanism and social support. Alternatively, trauma centers should consider mental health referral for patients who have experienced violent trauma or have low levels of social support, even when bedside screening tools identify them as having low mental health risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.112078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.112078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国外科医师学会现在要求对创伤中心住院患者进行心理健康筛查和随访。全国估计表明,这些患者中有20- 40%会在受伤后一年内发展为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和/或抑郁症。研究已经确定了简短的床边筛查,可以预测出院后的创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症,如创伤幸存者筛查和创伤周围痛苦量表。然而,假阴性是很常见的;近四分之一床边风险筛查为阴性的患者可能在出院后患上创伤后应激障碍或抑郁症,并且可能得不到适当的随访。因此,迫切需要改进床边风险筛查工具。我们旨在确定床边筛查阴性患者心理健康症状的人口学、社会和创伤相关预测因素。方法:患者是由一级创伤中心服务的创伤幸存者,经创伤幸存者筛查确定为“发展为PTSD/抑郁症的低风险”。从医疗记录中收集患者损伤类型和人口统计数据。结果:暴力伤害(如枪伤)和较低的可用社会支持水平预示着创伤后30天PTSD症状的升高。较低的社会支持也与受伤后30天抑郁症状的风险增加有关。结论:研究结果表明,风险筛查工具可以通过纳入捕获伤害机制和社会支持的项目来改进。另外,创伤中心应该考虑对经历过暴力创伤或社会支持水平低的患者进行心理健康转诊,即使床边筛查工具确定他们的心理健康风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bedside mental health risk screening of traumatic injury patients is enhanced by measurement of injury mechanism and social support.

Background: The American College of Surgeons now requires mental health screening and follow up for hospitalized patients in trauma centers. National estimates indicate that 20-40 % of these patients will develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression within one year post-injury. Research has identified brief bedside screens that predict PTSD and depression post-discharge, such as the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory. However, false negatives are common; almost a quarter of patients with a negative bedside risk screen may develop PTSD or depression post-discharge and may not receive appropriate follow up. As such, there is critical need to improve bedside risk-screening tools. We aimed to identify demographic, social, and trauma-related predictors of mental health symptoms among patients with negative bedside screens.

Method: Patients were injury survivors served by a Level I trauma center who were identified as "low risk for development of PTSD/depression" by the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen. Patient injury type and demographics were collected from the medical record.

Results: Violent injuries (e.g., gunshot wound) and lower levels of available social support predicted elevated PTSD symptoms 30-days post-injury. Lower social support also was associated with increased risk for depressive symptoms 30 days post-injury.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that risk-screening tools may be improved by including items that capture injury mechanism and social support. Alternatively, trauma centers should consider mental health referral for patients who have experienced violent trauma or have low levels of social support, even when bedside screening tools identify them as having low mental health risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信