绘制关于荷兰健康体重方法的学习社区动态:因果循环图。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Esther A H Kramer, Merel M van der Wal, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen
{"title":"绘制关于荷兰健康体重方法的学习社区动态:因果循环图。","authors":"Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Esther A H Kramer, Merel M van der Wal, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning communities (LCs) are increasingly used among multidisciplinary public health challenges, such as local healthy weight approaches. LCs aim to stimulate learning, collaboration and actions. Previous research has provided insights into the underlying elements of multidisciplinary LCs, but little is known about the perceived causalities of these elements. Therefore, limited is known about what can be done to leverage LCs. This study aims to gain insights into the perceived dynamics of multidisciplinary LCs during the starting phase, including variables, and interconnectedness between variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate LC dynamics, all members of two separate LCs participated in a qualitative interview about experiences, perceived learning, and actions during the first six months. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Subsequently, a qualitative causal loop diagram was designed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative causal loop diagram showed three intertwined themes. The first theme explains why group dynamics are essential, and how jointly arranging the LC may optimize group dynamics. The second theme explains how insights are obtained through multidisciplinary knowledge exchange. The third theme explains how actions are executed when conditions are met. These LC group dynamics, learning and action influenced one another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To optimize LCs, it is highly recommended that stakeholders arrange them jointly, involve the appropriate partners, match with LC members' needs, and motivate members to execute action. LC facilitators are recommended to use the causal loop diagram to identify their bottlenecks and how to intervene in those to optimize the LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the dynamics of learning communities about Dutch healthy weight approaches: a causal loop diagram.\",\"authors\":\"Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Esther A H Kramer, Merel M van der Wal, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning communities (LCs) are increasingly used among multidisciplinary public health challenges, such as local healthy weight approaches. LCs aim to stimulate learning, collaboration and actions. Previous research has provided insights into the underlying elements of multidisciplinary LCs, but little is known about the perceived causalities of these elements. Therefore, limited is known about what can be done to leverage LCs. This study aims to gain insights into the perceived dynamics of multidisciplinary LCs during the starting phase, including variables, and interconnectedness between variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate LC dynamics, all members of two separate LCs participated in a qualitative interview about experiences, perceived learning, and actions during the first six months. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Subsequently, a qualitative causal loop diagram was designed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative causal loop diagram showed three intertwined themes. The first theme explains why group dynamics are essential, and how jointly arranging the LC may optimize group dynamics. The second theme explains how insights are obtained through multidisciplinary knowledge exchange. The third theme explains how actions are executed when conditions are met. These LC group dynamics, learning and action influenced one another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To optimize LCs, it is highly recommended that stakeholders arrange them jointly, involve the appropriate partners, match with LC members' needs, and motivate members to execute action. LC facilitators are recommended to use the causal loop diagram to identify their bottlenecks and how to intervene in those to optimize the LC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01468-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习社区(LCs)越来越多地用于多学科公共卫生挑战,如当地健康体重方法。LCs旨在促进学习、协作和行动。先前的研究已经提供了对多学科LCs的潜在因素的见解,但对这些因素的感知因果关系知之甚少。因此,我们对如何利用低成本公司知之甚少。本研究旨在深入了解多学科LCs在初始阶段的感知动态,包括变量和变量之间的相互联系。方法:为了阐明LC动力学,两个独立LC的所有成员参加了一个关于前六个月的经历、感知学习和行动的定性访谈。访谈按主题进行分析。随后,设计了一个定性的因果循环图。结果:定性因果循环图显示了三个相互交织的主题。第一个主题解释了为什么群体动力学是必不可少的,以及如何共同安排LC可以优化群体动力学。第二个主题解释了如何通过多学科知识交流获得见解。第三个主题解释了在满足条件时如何执行操作。这些LC群体动态、学习和行动相互影响。结论:为了优化LC,强烈建议利益相关者共同安排LC,让合适的合作伙伴参与其中,匹配LC成员的需求,并激励成员执行行动。建议LC促进者使用因果循环图来确定他们的瓶颈,以及如何干预这些瓶颈以优化LC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the dynamics of learning communities about Dutch healthy weight approaches: a causal loop diagram.

Background: Learning communities (LCs) are increasingly used among multidisciplinary public health challenges, such as local healthy weight approaches. LCs aim to stimulate learning, collaboration and actions. Previous research has provided insights into the underlying elements of multidisciplinary LCs, but little is known about the perceived causalities of these elements. Therefore, limited is known about what can be done to leverage LCs. This study aims to gain insights into the perceived dynamics of multidisciplinary LCs during the starting phase, including variables, and interconnectedness between variables.

Methods: To elucidate LC dynamics, all members of two separate LCs participated in a qualitative interview about experiences, perceived learning, and actions during the first six months. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Subsequently, a qualitative causal loop diagram was designed.

Results: The qualitative causal loop diagram showed three intertwined themes. The first theme explains why group dynamics are essential, and how jointly arranging the LC may optimize group dynamics. The second theme explains how insights are obtained through multidisciplinary knowledge exchange. The third theme explains how actions are executed when conditions are met. These LC group dynamics, learning and action influenced one another.

Conclusions: To optimize LCs, it is highly recommended that stakeholders arrange them jointly, involve the appropriate partners, match with LC members' needs, and motivate members to execute action. LC facilitators are recommended to use the causal loop diagram to identify their bottlenecks and how to intervene in those to optimize the LC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信