元认知通过对特质推断的最佳加权来促进心理理论。

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042
Emily L Long, Caroline Catmur, Stephen M Fleming, Geoffrey Bird
{"title":"元认知通过对特质推断的最佳加权来促进心理理论。","authors":"Emily L Long, Caroline Catmur, Stephen M Fleming, Geoffrey Bird","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to represent and infer accurately others' mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), has been theorised to be associated with metacognitive ability. Here, we considered the role of metacognition in mental state inference through the lens of a recent theoretical approach to explaining ToM, the 'Mind-space' framework. The Mind-space framework posits that trait inference, representation of the qualities of the mind giving rise to the mental state, is important in forming accurate mental state inferences. We tested a potential role for metacognition in facilitating optimal weighting of trait inferences, as well as several theoretical predictions regarding factors associated with the accuracy of trait inference and confidence in those trait inferences. Participants completed a judgement-of-confidence task in the trait inference domain alongside the Interview Task, a recently-developed task for assessing the accuracy of trait and mental state inferences. A simple relationship in which increased metacognitive sensitivity is associated with increased accuracy of mental states inferences was not found. However, when predicting trial-level performance, confidence in trait inference was shown to modulate the effect of trait inference accuracy on mental state inference accuracy. This effect was greater in magnitude with lower metacognitive sensitivity, i.e., when confidence is more likely to be misplaced. Furthermore, participants' trait inference ability was associated with the accuracy of their understanding of the average mind. In addition, the accuracy of specific trait inferences was predicted by the participant's similarity to the target, but this similarity benefit was reduced in participants whose self-perception was inaccurate. Reported confidence in a given trait inference was also predicted by participant-target similarity, such that participants showed greater overconfidence in judgements made about similar targets. This overconfidence effect was larger when self-perception was more erroneous. Results support several theoretical claims made by the Mind-space theory, and further elucidate the processes underlying accurate mental state inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"256 ","pages":"106042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognition facilitates theory of mind through optimal weighting of trait inferences.\",\"authors\":\"Emily L Long, Caroline Catmur, Stephen M Fleming, Geoffrey Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to represent and infer accurately others' mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), has been theorised to be associated with metacognitive ability. Here, we considered the role of metacognition in mental state inference through the lens of a recent theoretical approach to explaining ToM, the 'Mind-space' framework. The Mind-space framework posits that trait inference, representation of the qualities of the mind giving rise to the mental state, is important in forming accurate mental state inferences. We tested a potential role for metacognition in facilitating optimal weighting of trait inferences, as well as several theoretical predictions regarding factors associated with the accuracy of trait inference and confidence in those trait inferences. Participants completed a judgement-of-confidence task in the trait inference domain alongside the Interview Task, a recently-developed task for assessing the accuracy of trait and mental state inferences. A simple relationship in which increased metacognitive sensitivity is associated with increased accuracy of mental states inferences was not found. However, when predicting trial-level performance, confidence in trait inference was shown to modulate the effect of trait inference accuracy on mental state inference accuracy. This effect was greater in magnitude with lower metacognitive sensitivity, i.e., when confidence is more likely to be misplaced. Furthermore, participants' trait inference ability was associated with the accuracy of their understanding of the average mind. In addition, the accuracy of specific trait inferences was predicted by the participant's similarity to the target, but this similarity benefit was reduced in participants whose self-perception was inaccurate. Reported confidence in a given trait inference was also predicted by participant-target similarity, such that participants showed greater overconfidence in judgements made about similar targets. This overconfidence effect was larger when self-perception was more erroneous. Results support several theoretical claims made by the Mind-space theory, and further elucidate the processes underlying accurate mental state inference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"106042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确描述和推断他人心理状态的能力,被称为心理理论(ToM),已被理论证明与元认知能力有关。在这里,我们通过最近的一种理论方法来解释ToM,即“心理空间”框架,来考虑元认知在心理状态推断中的作用。心理空间框架假定特质推断,即心理品质的表征,产生心理状态,对于形成准确的心理状态推断很重要。我们测试了元认知在促进特质推断的最佳加权方面的潜在作用,以及关于特质推断的准确性和对这些特质推断的信心相关因素的几个理论预测。参与者在完成特质推断领域的自信判断任务的同时,还完成了面试任务,这是一项最近开发的评估特质和心理状态推断准确性的任务。没有发现一个简单的关系,即增加的元认知敏感性与心理状态推断的准确性增加有关。然而,当预测试验水平的表现时,特质推断的信心被证明可以调节特质推断准确度对心理状态推断准确度的影响。这种影响在元认知敏感度较低的情况下更为显著,也就是说,当信心更有可能被放错位置时。此外,参与者的特质推断能力与他们对平均心智的理解的准确性有关。此外,特定特征推断的准确性由参与者与目标的相似性预测,但这种相似性利益在自我知觉不准确的参与者中降低。参与者与目标的相似性也可以预测参与者对特定特征推断的信心,因此参与者对相似目标的判断表现出更大的过度自信。当自我认知错误时,这种过度自信的影响更大。结果支持了心理空间理论提出的几个理论主张,并进一步阐明了准确心理状态推断的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metacognition facilitates theory of mind through optimal weighting of trait inferences.

The ability to represent and infer accurately others' mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), has been theorised to be associated with metacognitive ability. Here, we considered the role of metacognition in mental state inference through the lens of a recent theoretical approach to explaining ToM, the 'Mind-space' framework. The Mind-space framework posits that trait inference, representation of the qualities of the mind giving rise to the mental state, is important in forming accurate mental state inferences. We tested a potential role for metacognition in facilitating optimal weighting of trait inferences, as well as several theoretical predictions regarding factors associated with the accuracy of trait inference and confidence in those trait inferences. Participants completed a judgement-of-confidence task in the trait inference domain alongside the Interview Task, a recently-developed task for assessing the accuracy of trait and mental state inferences. A simple relationship in which increased metacognitive sensitivity is associated with increased accuracy of mental states inferences was not found. However, when predicting trial-level performance, confidence in trait inference was shown to modulate the effect of trait inference accuracy on mental state inference accuracy. This effect was greater in magnitude with lower metacognitive sensitivity, i.e., when confidence is more likely to be misplaced. Furthermore, participants' trait inference ability was associated with the accuracy of their understanding of the average mind. In addition, the accuracy of specific trait inferences was predicted by the participant's similarity to the target, but this similarity benefit was reduced in participants whose self-perception was inaccurate. Reported confidence in a given trait inference was also predicted by participant-target similarity, such that participants showed greater overconfidence in judgements made about similar targets. This overconfidence effect was larger when self-perception was more erroneous. Results support several theoretical claims made by the Mind-space theory, and further elucidate the processes underlying accurate mental state inference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信